RedLeg in M'Boro, TN
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM

Be it: National Socialist German Workers' Party (National Social Deutshe Arbeit Party [NSDAP]), or USSR {CCCP on the Olympic Clothes}, or Cuba's Socialism, or Maoist Doctrine or Roman Elitism or Egyptian Totalitarism, or Greeks going from tyrant (liberator) to tyrant (evil ruller), central government countrol is wrong. It is the 50 independent states. State meaning self rule. With a republic that protects and cooperates.


56hornet in Lubbock
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM

To stop a conflict in interest, any one drawing government assistance of any kind, should be taken off the voting rolls until the hand out stops.


Jim in Alabama
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:49 PM

It really is that simple...This country began with the vote as a privilege of property owners, period...True or False?


Brian in Newport News
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 9:03 AM

Not that I can see from my reading of the Constitution. As you know, the President is elected by the Electoral College. Senators used to be selected by the States, but has since been corrupted by 17th Amendment. Representatives are selected "by the People of the several States," (Article 1, Section 2). I don't know if the definition of "People" included only landowners, but I don't believe that it ever was.


MNIce in Minnesota
Monday, October 1, 2012 at 11:39 PM

The scope of the electorate was left up to each state; the only stipulation was the clause following the one Brian cited, that is, "the electors in each state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature." In Virginia, at least, one had to be a land owner to vote.


Todd Fowler in Colorado Springs, CO
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 10:46 AM

So...Mr. Jim in Alabama tell me...Due to the fact that I DON'T own property, due to the current economic conditions, since I am unemployed and have been for the past 22 MONTHS die to the economy, should I not be allowed to cast a vote? Should I not be allowed to own a firearm? Should I also not be allowed the freedom of speech in replying to your un-measured response? Should I be denied my right to religious freedom? JUST ASKING!!!!!! So that we might get a more solid footing on where you stand....as an elitist or as a true conservative that is actually concerned for his fellow man or just himself. JUST ASKING!!! So WHEN you do lose your right to vote because of some arbitrary condition...let me know and I will come assist you in defending your rights.


Mike in Bremerton, WA
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 2:47 PM

At the time of the fouding of our nation, the requirement to "own property" was fairly lax, and most voters qualified. (And, at the time, there was no gigantic government teat for people to suck off of.)

I would think it fair that to receive welfare (handouts, unearned), one would forfit the right to cast a ballot to elect those who could offer to buy their votes by passing laws to increase the size of that government teat. Retirees living on earned pensions, social security recipients, etc. would still be entitled to the franchise. But somehow, this idea that someone can be a welfare recipient, live off of food stamps, in government housing, have no skin in the game - and then vote for politicians who promise to make the entitlement hammock even more comfortable is offensive to those who work!


MNIce in Minnesota
Monday, October 1, 2012 at 11:50 PM

Freedom of speech and religion and the right to carry arms are guaranteed, "unlimited" rights. Smuggling those into the debate is a form of the straw man fallacy. Voting, on the other hand, is a limited right. One must be at least 18 and not a citizen of a state or of a territory of the United States. Most states add the further restriction that one must not be a convicted felon unless one's rights have been restored. The states can add a restriction on welfare recipients, so long as it is clear that the restrictions are not "racially targeted' (15th Amendment) or gender related (19th Amendment).


HorseTeethSam in Michigan
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:22 PM

Great idea, but one that will never happen - with Holder chasing down anything that remotely smells of voter list cleanup, only conservatives risk being removed from voter rolls.


Cerberus in Los Angeles
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM

I agree WHOLEHEARTEDLY!!! Unfortunately, your solution would eliminate Social Security Recipients, all those on Medicare and Medicaid, those on disability, all those receiving educational tuition grants and/or student loans from the government, mortgage deductions, SBA loans, charitable contribution deductions (unless approved by Uncle Sam), etc, etc, etc. We have reached a point in this country where 99 per cent of the American populace receives some kind of governmental largesse...


Mark in Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:41 PM

I don't consider SS and Medicare/caid, "largesse" or an "entitlement." We pay into it our entire working life. (If it were run correctly - and not borrowed against - it would not cost tax payers any extra.)

I also don't consider a student loan, mortgage deduction, or any other tax deduction in the same light. He's talking about programs where you receive $$, which is not specifically funded by the person receiving the handout. (Welfare, foodstamps, etc.)


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:11 PM

Mark, no, medicaid is a welfare entitlement, it has nothing to do with social security or medicare and all funding comes out of state and federal general revenue.


MNIce in Minnesota
Tuesday, October 2, 2012 at 12:01 AM

A federal student loan is government subsidized borrowing. An income tax deduction is NOT a government handout! It is an attempt to define expenses that should be counted against taxable "profit or gain." This gets distorted when Congress plays games with deductions and credits for social engineering purposes - social engineering is not one of the legitimate purposes of taxation described in Article I Section 8 Paragraph 1 of the US Constitution, the strange readings of the "General Welfare of the United States" clause notwithstanding.

As for Social Security and Medicare, if you were allowed to invest the money paid for those taxes in even a below-market average mutual fund, you would have several times more money to retire on than you get from the government. In other words, the government program is a terrible investment, the more so if die at a relatively early age (your survivors get little or nothing of the "unused funds"). If Social Security and Medicare were run correctly, they'd be like the Chilean system of personal ownership of retirement funds. Chile, incidentally, surpasses the United States on the index of economic freedom, and its retirees are generally in better shape financially than US citizens dependent on Social Security.


Kent Venable in Mangum, Ok.
Monday, October 1, 2012 at 2:08 PM

Social Security is NOT a gimmie. In my case, it was bought and paid for by 30+ years of hard work. You need to learn this.


David Thompson in Bellville, TX
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:24 PM

Unlikely, Mr. Hornet. Have you driven on US Highway 84 around Lubbock lately? You'd be taken off the voter rolls.


MNIce in Minnesota
Tuesday, October 2, 2012 at 12:07 AM

Sigh... another straw man argument. US 84 was built and is maintained with fuel taxes paid by the drivers. It is not a redistribution handout, it is a public infrastructure. It has nothing to do with the conflict of interest of a welfare recipient who has only to vote for a thief politician to take money away from a worker as per the argument for this restriction.


Brian in Seattle
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 8:48 PM

I LOVE that idea. Of course, that particular opportunity is long gone. The founders never envisioned that we would devolve into a society of moochers and looters (thanks Ayn Rand!) and never placed words that address this issue into our much battered constitution. I think I hear Madison spinning in his grave...


Jerry in Tustin
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:26 PM

Regarding the comment about the voters in the murky middle reminds of a great quote: They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin


Ted Green in Houston
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:32 PM

The President may be buying his votes with our money (remember President Bush and the Medicare Drug Plan?) but, to me, the most disturbing thing about his numbers is that, if you talk to most people, they aren't disturbed by his behavior because they just aren't paying attention. Voters have gotten incredibly lazy. It's work to pay attention and a lot of people don't want to work at this. If they did, even with a candidate running a campaign that would have made Tom Dewey proud, Romney would still be comfortably ahead.


David Thompson in Bellville, TX
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:29 PM

Voters are lazy. Do you think that's new, Ted? The poll tax was the last way we tried to make them earn the privilege, however ineffectively, and it's been gone 50+ years.


Jimmy in Heath, Ohio
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 4:15 AM

I agree that is the crazy part. I work with people and they are ok with it. I try to explain what obummer is doing and they just reply he needs more time to turn us around. The misinformation campaign is working on the sheeple.


Gordon Holmes in Ocala, FL
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:35 PM

The economic disaster of socialism is the lack of understanding by people who teke from the government that everything must be paid for by someone. Thye fail to recognize the subtle effects of taking such as the things not produced that would spur the economy more than the taking of money feom the government. the government does not have any money or economic power withwhich to create jobs and consequently economic growth. every dollar given in entitlements has to come from somebody's pocket and thus those funds cannot be used to create jobs and spur economic growth. It is simple economics that if you use a resource for one thing something else gets left out and that is the fallacy behind re-distribution.


UGA67 in Herndon, VA
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 2:28 PM

"That Which Is Seen and That Which Is Not Seen" -- Frederic Bastiat


Old Grouch in Colorado Springs, CO
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:36 PM

"From each,... to each" may be the 'Marxist' motto, but I cannot find where Karl wrote it. It is not in the Communist Manifesto. It may have originated with a Swedish socialist 20 years prior to the Manifesto.

Given that the "rich" already pay the bulk of the taxes, hitting them even harder won't raise much revenue. BHO admitted this when he told Charles Gibson "It's not about revenue, it's about fairness." Or punishing the successful. The really rich won't pay more, they have armies of lawyers and accountants to see to that. They are also mostly BHO supporters.

Small business and the not quite so rich? KYAG


HorseTeethSam in Michigan
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:24 PM

The problem is not how much the rich pay, the problem is that they exist at all. The left's job won't be done until everyone is equally poor and nobody is working.


David Thompson in Bellville, TX
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:33 PM

Sam, even in totalitarian socialist regimes, the totalitarians are quite rich still. Fidel Castro lives better than royalty or tycoons.


Ol'Joe in North Carolina
Sunday, September 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM

True, David. Better he enjoy his socialist utopia now while on earth, because his next million or so years will be pure hell.


RADDAD in Atlanta
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:09 PM

Fredricks Engels - 1847
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm Did not fine the exact quote. Section 18 is the Democrat blueprint.


David Thompson in Bellville, TX
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:35 PM

KYAG. How eloquent, OG.


David Thompson in Bellville, TX
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM

From Wikipedia, "Critique of the Gotha Program:"

The Critique [written May, 1875] is also notable for elucidating the principle of "To each according to his contribution" as the basis for a "lower phase" of communist society directly following the transition from capitalism, and "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" as the basis for a future "higher phase" of communist society. In describing the lower phase, he states that "the individual receives from society exactly what he gives to it" and advocates remuneration in the form of labour vouchers as opposed to money. The Critique of the Gotha Program, published after his death, was one of Marx's last major writings.


Colorado Patriot in Colorado Springs
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 7:05 AM

No, as Alexander wrote, it WAS Karl Marx, and in from his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program.


Lowell in Johns Island, SC
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:39 PM

We - the people - are outside of Washington, and WE will change it!


zulu in Tennessee
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:10 PM

I agree that Romney needs to go for the gusto. So far, it's just been tit for tat. There's some real stuff out there that can be used. I don't know who is handling his campaign, but they are not doing a great job. I am going to vote for him regardless and I know others who are, but there are many who aren't informed and they haven't decided yet.


Norman Williams in Uniontown
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:42 PM

if he don't start being an attacker,instead of a receiver he will not win.Give it all back to them or lose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Jiggs in Millen, GA
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:42 PM

Yup, that's teh way it is. If it's free, they want it. However, one thing these freebie lovers haven't considered is that once Obama is in again, the freebies will gradually dry up, and they will be worse off then they are now. Most of that group of Americans don't understand is that tehre is a price on everything whether it is out in the open or not. In all ways we pay, and in some cases dearly for our stupidity. If Obama wins, and God forbid he does, soon after he is in the White House again, the wringing of hands will start anew along with the whining and wailing about "Why didn't I vote the other way?" By then it will be too late. If you are willing to pay the price for your folly, then you deserve it.


Longhorn in Florida
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:43 PM

The increasing poll numbers for Obama is no surprise, Democrats have always bought votes, a cell phone, smokes, free rides to the polling location with a ballot already marked. whatever it takes. Also not surprising is that I considerr the largest part of the Democrat base, is woefully ignorant and uninformed or stupid, take your pick. Democrats also do fuzzy math and polls are just polls, B.S. in and B.S. out, Their man is a disaster they know it and quite possibly the fuzzy poll numbers are supposed to demoralize the Republican voters. Well you won't demoralize this guy. I know how disgraceful this President is, I have a read a library of books on him, and the people who vote for the man of perdition deserve him, except if effects everyone. Last question. Why is this guy still standing if not for a complicit Congress and SCOTUS?


David Thompson in Bellville, TX
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:42 PM

Longhorn (Teasip?), if we have to endure a second Obama term, we may well see major confrontations in the Congress and the Courts. If we don't, the Republic will suffer greatly. He wasn't whistling Dixie when he told the Russians he'd have "more flexibility," as incredibly stupid as that boast was.


cree in Wyoming
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM

To your question, my answer would be cowardice to principles because of their lack of considering them. And probably too the want of denial after the reality of electing our first black president, the fear of impeaching him and the consequences would not be tolerable. Instead we tolerate cowardice and those consequences. We should have taken King's character criteria advice because Obama's character is of the worst our country has offered.


Ronald Isham in Boquete, Chiriqui, Panama
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:44 PM

Mark, you're preaching to the choir. You know probably much better than I that your readership is primarily those such as myself who are like-minded and in basic agreement with your political philosophy, statements and rather heroic efforts. Alas, and thus, you are not reaching those in what you accurately describe as the "murky middle". Personally I often forward your messages to those whom I believe to be receptive but perhaps not totally accepting. Those who have not as yet cemented their choice for president can, I believe, best be swayed by appealing to their emotions — a method that Obama, despite his alleged aloofness, has mastered. Hence the Romney-Ryan ticket must do a couple of things: 1) convince voters that Romney is not Bush, even criticize the policies (especially domestic spending) of the former president and explain the differences; 2) Obama will remain Obama — what you've seen is what you'll get — increased government intervention, increased debt, increased taxes, less employment, uncertain future and an overall weaker America. Voters are fearful for their future, the future of their children and the future of America. Cynical as it may seem Romney-Ryan must play to that anxiety and provide how the Republicans can alter that road to perdition that is promised by another 4 years of Obama.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM

Ronald, exactly right, appeals to reason will accomplish little, reasonable voters are already ours,only emotion can work. The winning idea is fear and anger. For example; the Zimmerman case, the New Black Panthers, witchdoctor Wright, crimes committed by illegal aliens, exploding welfare and foodstamp rolls, terrorist attacks, and so on.

The Drats understand this and are making people fear and despise Romney, they are using a solid negative campaign very successfully and that is why Romney’s polls are tanking. Romney’s ads are garbage, one or two of the Pac ads are good. Romney was the perfect candidate for Obonga to run against, his wealth and corporate raider history make him a perfect target, and he doesn’t fight back.


Mandy Fox in Glens Fall, NY
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:45 PM

Alexander's opinion below is very on point though I disagree with his take on the polling by the MSM which is proving to be downright deceitful and intent on discouraging people from voting - If Obama is ahead and going to win why bother to vote for Mitt? But, most people are asking how Obama can be ahead when over 50% of people are against Obamacare? Are we to believe that these people are going to vote for Obama? Or when over 70% of Catholics believe that what the Obama administration and the left is doing to the Catholic Church is nothing more than modern day persecution – forcing the Church to go against the very tenant of its teaching of life to forcibly accept the left’s culture of death, all under the phony guise of women’s issues? Are we to believe that the Catholics, and the Christians who see the persecution of the Catholic Church, are going to vote for Obama? What about our military personnel? The majority of them are against how the Obama administration is disarming them, literally and figuratively, throughout the world. Are we to believe that the majority of them are going to vote for Obama? So who is going to vote for Obama? Hard line leftists; blacks, whether politically conservative or not, because their skin color matches Obama’s; Hispanics, whether legal or not; welfare recipients; the dead; the elderly? The elderly are getting hit from both sides with arguments but there are some even within this group that knows Obama is going to hang them out to dry so they won’t vote for him. How about women and women's issues? Since women, and particularly single female headed househoulds are being hit hardest during this economy, are we to believe that women are going to view their vaginas as more important than a chance to have a good job, a roof over their heads, and a better future for their children? Sure, some women will see the state as their husband and opt for the pseudo-security of welfare benefits but I'm sure a lot would prefer something better for their children than that life. So my question is will all the groups who are voting for Obama be enough for him to win the election? I really think the majority of Americans will crawl over hot coals to vote against Obama no matter how much the media and leftist's polling organizations try to dissuade us not to waste our time.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:46 PM

Mandy, no, Romney polls are tanking because Obonga is running a much better ad campaign, it is not just the moestream media lying to you. As I mentioned above, Romney was the perfect candidate for Obonga to run against, and he is exploiting that effectively. No doubt the polls are skewed, but not enough to explain the rapid movement.


V.M. Pendleton in Oklahoma
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:49 PM

Brilliant. But how do we get this message to the ignorant masses?


loaded and wating to refresh the tree of liberty in Colorado
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:46 PM

you can not enlighten the ignorant, because they are ignorant. you have 2 choices when dealing with those sucking on the govt teet. Rip the teet out of their mouths and let them fend for their selves (which will happen when obama wins) or shoot them in the head.. which will happen when obama wins.. no problems.


One VA Patriot in Arlington, VA
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM

First, your position does our cause no benefit by referring to those who do not essentially agree with the patriot argument as "ignorant." You'll find more bees swarming to your nectar if you don't coax them with an elctronic bug-zapper.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:50 PM

One, so right, “ignorant” is far too mild a term to use for those who hate our country.


Loren E Anderson in Zanesville, OH 43701
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 12:57 PM

The phrase, you can't change Washington from the inside".... Very true...when one is not at home, it can't be done.... Have the man stay in his office and try. loren


Dave Cochran in Louisiana
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM

These articles are great.. well researchedand backed up with facts. The only issue I have is simply this... I know all of this already! Have known for years now..along with EVERYONE else who received this via email. How do nail the feet to the floor of those on the gov't teet long enough to get this info to them and encourage them to at least look at what we see????


Ken W in Hastings FL
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM

Well yes Alexander is preaching to the choir so to say, but this is some of the best dissemination of data available, and I applaud Alexander and his team for being there and doing it.


Ron Ellis in Dayton, Ohio
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:04 PM

I think there are still a significant number of people with functioning brains that realize the socialistic promises of security are fantasy and will participate in a change in leadership in this election.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:53 PM

Ron, yes, maybe 10% of the electorate understand the economics of it, the rest will vote on emotion.


grant in Carlsbad, CA
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:06 PM

“Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay.” But that is what a flat tax rate would do does. Ten percent of $100,000 is ten times more than ten percent of $10,000. The only reason we have a complex tax system is give politicians power and control, and create government jobs.


SammysDad in Virginia
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM

Let the polls and the Obama water boys continue t say he's way out in front. The apathetic, ignorant, and stupid people will believe it and remain home. I know no Republican that would not vote just because a poll shows Romney behind. It only makes us more determine then ever to vote. Hail to those dummies, please stay home and drink your beer on November 6th.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:55 PM

SD, no, with mail in and early voting Drats can easily get out their vote.


UGA67 in Herndon, VA
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 2:19 PM

''The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.'' -- Joseph Stalin


desert in az
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM

regarding the polls! Figures don't lie, but liars figure!


Tom Hartnett in Ronkonkoma, NY
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:12 PM

Romney should become our next President but he does not demonstrate the necessary "fire in the belly" to convince people to vote for him. Obama will be reelected with a subsequent violent unrest in this country to bring it back to the democratic republic the Founders had created, i.e. Obama will be removed from office by a violent act, by either domestic or foreign groups.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 6:02 PM

Tom, Romney thought that he could waltz in on the bad economy and is as clueless as McCain when it comes to running against Obonga. We are nowhere near violent unrest, it will take much more than a bad economy to get there.


David in Boston
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:13 PM

I disagree with the idea that BHO is a consummate politician. Nothing could be farther from the truth. He is a straw man invented and covered by a partisan media. He is the poster child for affirmative action blended with the Peter Principle. Not only has his water been carried by everyone else BUT himself, he has been afforded every entitlement and forgiving media tactic possible as he has been promoted past his depth to perform. If the Electoral College has not been corrupted, I predict a landslide in November that will eclipse Reagan's. Time will tell.


The Texas Cooke in Lockhart, Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:14 PM

When the people rise up this time, it will NOT be in revolt....it will be to stop the revolt.....the revolt to over-throw the U. S. Constitution....and Barry doesn't have a clue who he is messing with.


Ron B in Houston, Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:15 PM

The liberal media should broadcast from the Whitehouse as they are so in the tank for BO. However, the liberal media are trying to get voters for Romney discouraged and not vote. I feel that Romeny is going to win in a landslide, if not, this country is finished as a Constitutional Republic. These polls are so bogus for Obama that it is funny. Romney is up bigtime. Why would Obama buy a house in Hawaii for 2013 unless he knows he is going to lose.


HorseTeethSam in Michigan
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:33 PM

When Obama wins in November, I expect the 22nd amendment will go away by April. Although I will (and always have) vote conservative, I honestly don't believe we'll win. Our nation is terminally sick: the Marxist machine is too deeply embedded into our culture, our morals and our religion to be removed without killing the patient. We (as a country) should have been paying attention back in the 60s and 70s when these individuals were kids smoking dope and having free love in the streets. Now, they are integrated into our system and are the movers and shapers of our future. We have surrendered our nation voluntarily.


Mark in Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:49 PM

Unfortunately – I agree with your assessment…


Robert Grant, in SE AZ
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 8:43 PM

Uh Huh! I agree with your agreement. Tragic, but there it is in clear view in history.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 6:10 PM

Horse, in my view the tipping point was in 1920 with the 19th Amendment and we went over the cliff in 1965 with unlimited third world immigration legislation. The “60s and 70s when these individuals were kids smoking dope and having free love in the streets” are a symptom, not a cause.


Abu Nudnik in Toronto
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 11:53 PM

You're too pessimistic. Keep your spirits up. The 22nd requires a 2/3 majority in congress and 3/4 of the states must ratify. We need to think rationally.


demsarerats in Oregon
Saturday, September 29, 2012 at 2:30 AM

Abu, the 22nd Amendment is not the problem, we know that it is unlikely to be repealed anytime soon. It is the other issues mentioned on this thread, which you ignore, that are the problem.


Ken W in Hastings FL
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM

If and only if the majority of Americans get off their lazy behinds and go vote, we will be able to hold the elected accountable.

As for Obama's polls, the reputable polls have this election about dead even. Obama being the incumbent has a 50/50 chance by default. We cannot change that, but we can ignore all the hyperbole and get everyone to vote right up to the last minute.


Jere Wineman in Columbus, Mississippi
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM

I read, I listen to the multitude of ads, news persons, and now about what Romney should do to win. Why doesn't he just say"Forget what I paid in Taxes, forget about the rich paying more taxes. Let's just get more jobs with workers paying taxes, that aren't being paid now , and we will have our economy headed back in the right direction". Everyone should pay taxes on all money...earned or government supplied.... Time to listen to our founding fathers who evidently had a much better knowledge of how to run a country , Jere Wineman


Richard N. Jones in Blanchard, OK
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:40 PM

The largest common denominator in the economy is the price of DIESEL fuel. Everything ships by diesel, truck, train, plane or ship. All freight


Melvin W. Clayton in Independence, Kansas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:43 PM

I am 92 and remember the FDR years very well. The great national danger today is that the people are not informed or are poorly informed. We need an informed electorate and it doesn't exist in my opinion. Our schools teach little or nothing about our history or werkings of the government, and the mainstream media is in bed with socialism. I don't see an end to it.


Richard N. Jones in Blanchard, OK
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:45 PM

The largest common denominater in or economy is DIESEL fuel.

WE use it to fuel trucks, planes, trains, and ships. It adds to the cost of everything we eat, wear or use. Mitt needs to use!


Mark in Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:52 PM

Huh???????


RADDAD in Atlanta
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:50 PM

when selling real estate - location, location, location when selling solutions - jobs, jobs, jobs - due to an increased platform of optimism, lowered corporate (LLS and sub S) taxes, less govt intervention, assure the elderly that medicare is solid for them !! Assure the younger workers that social security will be modified and will work for them !!! The entitled need to work to receive. Govt paid abortions END !!! Muslimism is NOT a preferred religion. A hate crime is NOT speaking the TRUTH. And a lying govt will NOT be tolerated. A video caused the death of an ambassador and marines - this is what the Obama Administration fed us as the reson, when they knew that it was a terrorrist attack, and even had prior warnings. Osama is dead, so AlQieda is defeated. WHAT A CROCK !!!!!!] Get this Bum and his croonies OUT, or this country may never recover !!!


N. Schulze in Florida
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:50 PM

Finally, someone has hit the nail on the head. Add to it that the Obama machine is pouring on micro-targeting social technology that makes 2008 look like kindergarten - once again leaving the right in the technological dust.


Melvin W. Clayton in Independence, Kansas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 1:53 PM

I just read a letter of June 12, 1816 that Thomas Jefferson wrote to Samuel Kercheval - OH HOW FAR WE HAVE VEERED OFF COURSE!!!!!!!!!


One VA Patriot in Arlington, VA
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM

Mr. Clayton,

Could you provide the citation for your comment? I would enjoy reading Mr. Jefferson's letter.


Carole Mitchell in Colorado
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:00 PM

This is the most profound and complete summation of the position of our country and how Obama orchestrated it, and how he is moving toward his goal! Thank you for putting it in print. If only every American could read and understand the "Truth". Wish this could be one of Romney's speeches!


ksswede in Kansas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:02 PM

I don't think it will matter that much who is elected as President. Congress is the group that should be focused upon. We are in debt so deem and the public is so dependent on government entitlements that I am afraid that our country is destined to doom.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 6:23 PM

Kss, yes, I am even more convinced of that now.


Marilyn in Missouri
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM

"Ronald Reagan devoted his campaign to restoring the grassroots optimism necessary for reversing the crisis of confidence miring our economy in the mud". And that is exactly what Ron Paul would have been able to do in addition to having far better economic, social and foreign affairs policies than Romney or Obama. Ron Paul would have defeated Obama hands down. He would have unified Republicans rather than disenfranchising constitutional conservatives as Romney has done, and he would have picked up the disenfranchised Democrats as well. You know - the ones who still want God in their platform and don't like the killing of babies.


ken in new york
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 5:59 PM

Marilyn, I concur. with regard to Obama and Romney; they are two sides of the same coin. There will be no real change. As patriots most are so caught up in the left/right, liberal/conservative,democrat/republican paradigm, they can't see the forest through the trees. with regard to party loyalty consider the following:

"the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it. It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-rounded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another; foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passion. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another." -George Washington's farewell address September 19, 1796


john in Kalamazoo, Michigan
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:12 PM

we have come to the defining moment in our nations history, our rights are God given and bought with the blood of sacrifice that No one can take away not only is that blood calling out but all those who have gone before us to achieve that dream purchased with such a great price. we will go to the polls, we will go to the streets we will shout out that message clear and loud, No More, We want out Nation back!!!!! it is not the elites to give away or steal, we will speak... You are Fired.!!!! God Bless America. Proud and Free. we will endure.


Big Sky Jim in Huntley,MT
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:16 PM

I am truly dismayed at the fact that a second term is a remote possiblilty. That is an indictment on the country as a whole. My greater worry is the electorate that put such evil idiots in office such as Pelosi, Reid, the campainger in chief and so forth. Elections should be an evolution that is honorable-character MATTERS. That is not the case today.


David Thompson in Bellville, TX
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:20 PM

Obama is a "more menacing foe" than Carter was ONLY because he's been willing to bankrupt the government (and possibly the nation), by borrowing $5 trillion to buy his re-election. He is otherwise totally incompetent, as was Carter.


Angry American in Colorado
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:38 PM

I for one, dont believe in polls, dont trust anyone running or in public office. I take care of myself.. trust me.. obama will win, he will then declair all guns illegal.. idiots will turn in their weapons, fuel and food prices will skyrocket, unemployment will sky rocket.. bands of thugs will roam the streets taking food and fuel and killing at will. The police will do nothing, the military will do nothing.. if you are not armed and prepared to defend yourself and liberty.. you are history. then you will hear people saying why did I vote for this guy... oh I was so stupid.. and the media will stand by showing how great our dictator-in-chief is.. the great obama.. king of america..


Kelly Jarboe in Blue Springs, MO
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM

There is a lot of truth to your article but the thing that gets me is the sheer ignorance of the Population that choose to buy into it. Comon sence dictates that there is no way to tear down the Wealthy to raise up the less fortunate ones in society, the promise of the Central Government is basically the same as the Lies that were used to force he Native American People into acepting the Handouts by the Government for the Right to take their land and allow them an Island in which to live, if you want to see how well that worked out take a close look at the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, then ask yourself is that the way you want your family to live. I think not. Reject the Obama deal and look to yourselves for a way out his way is total destruction.


UGA67 in Herndon, VA
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 2:10 PM

You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.

... Abraham Lincoln


Robert in Morris
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 2:52 PM

What you say true, however there is not much that be done about it. Too many things have to go right for Romney, Obama will win like it or not.


Corbin Douthitt in Hurst
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:01 PM

I can only hope that Romney will show the President for what he is and what he does and let the President lie about who he is to the people. But-- likely his handlers will not let him do so. They are the Old Guard Republicans- and do not really believe that he will win. They are afraid of Conservatives- because the are really Democrats at heart. the Democrats are Socialists. Romney is a wimp. More so than McCain was. the Democrats will run over him with lies innuendo and the MSM will run ahead of him screaming for him. Romney cannot win if he allows the Democrats t o drive the issues and the media to continue to soft sell the President with NO questions about his pre-election promises and economic failures. They refuse to point out his policies that restrict the economy and whine about needing more time. They still blame Bush. If Obie is re-elected, who will they blame the problems on next year? Bush? Really? I predict a civil war if Obama is re-elected. Especially if there is ANY whiff of voter fraud. The Democrats ALWAYS whine about voter fraud, to deflect THEIR fraudulent practices. It wasn't a Republican that stole the ballot boxes in South Texas that helped elect Lyndon Johnson.. It has never been a Republican that stole races in Chicago.. it has ALWAYS been Democrats that cannot tell the truth and must lie , cheat and steal to win.


D. Buck in New Paris, IN
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:06 PM

"The [unemployment] figure . . . ignores the millions of Americans who've given up looking for work and are thus no longer counted in the workforce, and millions more who are underemployed." Okay, but while we're talking about the Great Depression, let's compare apples to apples. Back then a large percentage of women were not habitually employed. Now, most women are. So the fact that many of them may have left the workforce doesn't mean that families are worse off than they were in 1932. To give an example, my grandparents were hit hard by the Crash of '29. He lost his job at the Buick plant, and defaulted on his mortgage. But she had already given up her lucrative teaching job when she got pregnant with their first son in 1926. So her lack of earned income wouldn't have landed her on the unemployment lists back then. In 1988, my wife declined to renew her teaching contract when she became pregnant with her first son; but she was nonetheless advised to apply for unemployment on the grounds that the school she taught at had a policy against re-hiring her anyway, had she attempted to renew her contract as a pregnant woman. The loss of my grandfather's job had a devastating effect on his family. They left the city and moved to a farm where their pay was the use of a dilapidated hired-hand house, all the milk they could drink, and one hog a year. The family continued to live in poverty until the youngest child was old enough that my grandmother could go back to her lucrative taxpayer-financed career as a schoolteacher. On the other hand, my family has done quite well in the 24 years since my wife left the workforce, and she has no plans to go back. Instead, she has saved our local tax base over half a million dollars by educating our 9 children herself (it will be upwards of a million dollars by the time she is done in 2028).


Doug Priester in Maumelle, Arkansas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:16 PM

The Romney camp is doing an awful job on advertising, attacking, and tossing out one-liner solutions to problems. The marketing and PR for the Republican party should all be fired. They have a winning combination with the Romney Ryan ticket and are letting it slip thru their fingers.


Jim in Dallas, TX
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM

Hello Bullet Box! Stock up!!!


Drugbert in Georgia
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:20 PM

To quote a Republican President.."There you go again"...it's seems to me the "murky " is in the minds of the righteous right, blaming Clinton and now FDR for the mess we are in now. What about the mess Reagan left us in...huge debt, de-regulation that filled the coffers of the carpetbaggers in oil, gas, and communication, an environment under siege....you are right in that the Republicans were really Democrats (Southern) who stoled the GOP from under the nose of the noble aristocratic GOP...we need to stop the finger pointing, quit accusing EVERY democrat of being a bleeding socialist liberal and learn that governing requires comprimise to achieve the common goals of America. Bring back American Altruism...the real patriotism!


Paul in Lucerne Valley
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:28 PM

If this obama stooge likes socialism so much then he should relocate to Russia then, he should fit right in with people that are just like him. The little boy called obama has done nothing for this nation except get us into more debit, he Is going to single handily destroy this country just as he wants then he will turn it over to the UN and they will finish what he started. He wants to remake this nation in his own image well it took the Founding Fathers how long to come up with the current Constitution, it took like 11 years to do that. This poor little boy that is in the oval office wants to create one in less than three years. What he would wind up doing is getting rid of all of our freedoms and return this country to a slave nation much like Russia is today.


Bob in MO
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:30 PM

To the bare cupboard and a stack of overdue bills, the jobless will reach for "benefit" while glancing briefly at "liberty.". Romney must tell exactly how we will be better off with Obama gone. "How" will he create jobs (Keystone, shale drilling, enticing manufacturers to manufacturer here, etc) being specific in solutions. He repeatedly tells us how bad it is. PLEASE specify how he will make the economy better. In today's culture hunger may trump freedom.


Jesse in Graham
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:35 PM

More and more these mailers bring up the points Ron Paul mentioned. Too bad you guys didn't support him all along.


DockyWocky in WV
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:49 PM

The most corrupt administration in history, Goebbels ghost guiding his MSM, legions of freeloading morons chanting his praises, and vote fraud like nobody has ever seen. This turkey should by rights be sunbathing in GITMO like his Moslem Brotherhood brothers.


James Pogue in OK
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:53 PM

HOPE is a strange bedfellow with reality. Actually, it is like mixing water and oil. Until people start living in the real world, oil and water will continue to be put in the same pot. Politician's love mixing the two, and telling the vpter that it works.


Bob in Lawrence, Kansas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 3:54 PM

When Obama spews his misinformation and lies, the interviewer and audience should simply laugh at him, then ask: "Mr. Obama, do you really think the American people are so gullible as to accept your misinformation and lies at face value." I suspect the Narcissist-in-Chief would become publicly unhinged after that happened a few times.


Sandra Lee Smith in Prescott, AZ
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM

Patrick Henry had a GOOD handle on human nature! So did John Adams and many others of our Founding Fathers, and they did their level best to protect us from our own weaker natures; too bad so many WON'T listen to and heed their wisdom on our behalves!


don owen in fountain valley ca
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:01 PM

Obama has achieved the very highest level of BS and lies known to modern man


Concerned in Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:15 PM

As we 'dumb down' our educational systems, and allow socialists to prevail as professors/teachers, we at the same allow the killing of American history, patriotism and the love of family. If these major elements are missing, and our society eliminates God from everything, then socialism will succeed. The self-centered, greed of the 'entitled' classes is easily minipulated by the TV. Just watch one day and you will witness the corruption and see the 'indecent programming' that network TV provides. Turnkey children are being 'programmed' by this and there are no standards to prevent this from happening. When the president turns his back on our military, intentionally pronouncing military terms incorrectly, his influence is unmeasureable. He intentionally adds to the killing of patriotism and respect for the military. His corruption path is evident and he is mocking the public who still loves this country. Lying is a way of life for this creature and his intentions are evident. Decent Americans had better get out and vote or this tyrant will totally succeed in destroying our beloved nation. My son, and all of the others, will have died in vain.


Longhorn in Florida
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:16 PM

56Hornet in Lubbock. Does this include SS, Military Retired Pension and Disability from Service Connected health issues. i am just a transplanted Texan living in Florida, if it does, guess I don't vote. I don't consider these handouts. I have been and still paying into this so-called government assistance since I was about 15 years old when I got my first job, 26 1/2 years military service and now still paying taxes on all of these with the exception of the disability. Just wanted to clear up a couple things. Tip O' the Hat to ya in Lubbock.


Charlie in Arkansas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:21 PM

This president only thinks he is in charge. There is one MUCH higher than him who holds my future, and any others who can be called HIS. I will exercise my right as an American and vote for the man who I believe can help our country back to strength and prosperity. I truly hope Obama is not reelected, but again, I must emphasize - We DO NOT change God's plan, nor do we always understand the way he works His plan. That is what trust and faith are all about.


Longhorn in Florida
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:21 PM

Jesse in Graham. I listened to Ron Paul and alot of things made sense and then he jumps off the cliff. Maybe drinking untreated water out of Lake Jackson.


WOB in Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:24 PM

While, no doubt, some of what you've written does weigh into why Obama is polling so well despite his dismal performance, I've come to the conclusion that far too many voters are simply clueless. I've watched in amazement lately as video after video, from a variety of sources, has shown how potential voters/past voters have ZERO clue about Obama or Romney ... ZERO clue about the economy ... ZERO clue about world events. They don't read a paper ... don't watch the news ... are not informed in the least bit. It's like they're watching the world through a drinking straw ...


UGA67 in Herndon, VA
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 2:01 PM

My son taught Western Civilization & American History for a number of years last decade while working on his PhD at a major North Eastern university. His annual complaint: "Dad, what are these kids doing in HS? They don't know anything about American or world history; they're blank slates." Bye the way, he remarked that all but two of the History department professors were avowed Communists.


Gator in Florida
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM

Charlie in Arkansas, you may be onto something here. God will have the final word. In my lifetime God has gotten my attention a few times having taken things away from me, only to give me something better. Pray with conviction.I do know when people mock God, things don't turn out too well. Obama may think he is the Messiah, but he has a surprise coming.


Drew McCabe in Pittsburgh, Pa
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:18 PM

I've been reading these columns for more than 6 years, this one is, and I type this with utter disdain, as close to the truth as anything I've heard, watched or read in a very long, long time. My hope and prayer, Gov. Romney reads this before it's too late and God's Good Grace shines over him these next forty days so he can defeat socialism and loss of liberty.


Robert Grant, in SE AZ
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM

May happen, Drew. May. Not very hopeful, but will continue to add prayer to the idea.


demsarerats in Oregon
Saturday, September 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM

Drew, the article is true, and Romney won’t read it.


Tom Mumford in Manchester, Connecticut
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:24 PM

Though the 22nd Amendment to our constitution may limit Obama to two terms, why does anyone think that that won't be changed during his term, were he to get re-elected? Homosexuals getting married was, until recently, was never considered as a realistic change to our law. Yet...


greg d in colorado
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:24 PM

Im not voting for Romney,Im voting against Bama. Im hoping he will prove to be the better man. Its a crap shoot. Romney lets see how good you are !!! Prove it .


greg d in colorado
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:31 PM

Charlie, Prayers are indeed what is needed. God wants to hear our prayers for help, personally or for this nation, Obama isnt in charge God is .Faith may be tested by this election for sure.


Ken Adams in Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 5:56 PM

Heed the words of Thomas Jefferson.

Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition. - Thomas Jefferson

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. - Thomas Jefferson

When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson

To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical. - Thomas Jefferson

For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security. - Thomas Jefferson

I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. - Thomas Jefferson

It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid war; but if it shall actually take place, no matter by whom brought on, we must defend ourselves. If our house be on fire, without inquiring whether it was fired from within or without, we must try to extinguish it. - Thomas Jefferson

No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms. - Thomas Jefferson

The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. - Thomas Jefferson

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. - Thomas Jefferson

The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed. - Thomas Jefferson


RangerDoc in Savannah, GA
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 6:07 PM

The looters are winning as Ayn Rand predicted. They have the leftist media wind at their backs. More Americans now are takers than makers and our Republic will implode. I predict depression, but with a primarily urban population, ill-equipped to pursue the activities that our ancestors of prior depressions fell back upon: growing and canning their own food, entertaining themselves at home and just plain working very hard. Massive hunger, social violence and ultimately martial law will ensue. The fact that an astounding 47-48% of voting Americans this week are still Obama supports convinces me of this. The American experience is over. Turn out the lights and brace for the next thing to follow. It will be uglier than the Civil War and the Great Depression combined. May God Bless us all


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 6:49 PM

Ranger, you are so right, that is the bottom line here.


Jill in Iowa
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 6:18 PM

It is long passed time that Romney take the gloves off and start 'pounding' obama. If Romney does not start, here and now, to go after obama and hold him accountable for all the squandered tax payer dollars, for all the waste, for the weakening and demeaning of America in the eyes of the world, for all the 'end runs' around congress, for gutting welfare reform, etc. Romney cannot expect to win in November.

Time to toughen up and speak the truth! obama is quite the slick orator...Romney must be a tough customer in these upcoming debates, which are already stacked against him. 3 liberal moderators and the first debate being held on a college campus. The audience will be stuffed with obama supporters/students who will applaud, hoot and holler at every utterance from obama's mouth and who will boo and hiss at anything that Romney might state.


Bill Rice in Methuen, MA
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 6:18 PM

Obama is not invested in making America great, but in creating a welfare mentality that looks to the state for sustenance. America didn't become a great nation by developing people looking for a handout. Rather, it has been formulated by individuals seeking to produce a better life thru making contributions for the good of others. Obama is looking to make America a socialist nation. Socialism has never worked--and it never will. People don't go to socialist nations for the opportunity to better themselves. Let's give Obama the opportunity to be a community organizer again and vote in Romney!


Daniel Lanoue in Harlingen, Texas
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 7:39 PM

We will soon learn just how pathetically uniformed the average voter has become. Were it not for the liberal mainstream media bias, the result of this coming Presidential election would be an overwhelming defeat of Obama. Count the number of viewers of Fox News and you will have a very accurate count of the knowledgeable voters in this country. Not enough to save our country from the worst demagogue in the history of our nation. For those citizens who receive their disinformation solely from the network news channels, most will remain ignorant and many will be totally deceived. You can't win an argument with a stupid person.


Don Smith in Wisconsin
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 7:54 PM

The Romney ticket is missing the point with the "Are you better off" campaign. He needs to attack Obama at his roots....Abortion, socialism, and abandoning our allies overseas.


Pauline Swanson in Geneseo, IL
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 8:36 PM

I have, before me, this quote: (from Norman Thomas - 1884 to 1968, six-time Socialist Party Presidential candidate) "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of Liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without knowing how it happened...." When 'fear' gets the upper hand, those who fear need to READ & UNDERSTAND that quotation!


James Wright in Wheeling, WV
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM

I wish I could be more optomistic about Romney, but he is like McCain re-visited. The demorats have no qualms about getting down and dirty, yet Romney refuses to go that route. I think Ryan needs to introduce Romney to the basics of street fighting, get him fired up, make him man up so he can take obama on and see how good it feels to thump a commie.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 9:57 PM

James, so right, for example this ad: http://www.examiner.com/article/this-guy-shouldn-t-have-been-america-obama-s-willie-horton


Robert E8 USN Ret in SE AZ
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 8:57 PM

Obama is following the FDR diagram almost exactly. He has the same envelope that FDR had. Plus the benefit of instant information puke. Romney strikes most folks I know as Obama lite. Maybe not, but he is not doing much to dispel that notion. As of this moment, it may not be a "shoo in", but Obama is going to win for the same reasons FDR did. As Mark Alexander has so clearly pointed out. The consequence of that win, for the Republic? I do not have oracle ability, but I suspect it is going to be ugly. Very ugly.


demsarerats in Oregon
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM

Robert, so right, the question is how long it takes to get ugly.


John C. in Los Angeles, CA
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 9:00 PM

I am afraid that too many people in our country have become complacent and dependent on big brother. If the ballot box fails in November, our only recourse will be the bullet box. At 67, I stand ready to once again defend the constitution that I swore an oath to defend when I went to war in 1965. That oath is still in effect and will be until the day I die.


UGA67 in Herndon, VA
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 1:47 PM

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition! Same age, same oath.


Jim in Odessa, Tx
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 9:51 PM

Probably the only way to change the culture in the USA (and in the world) is to change the way we COLLECT taxes. The national retail sales tax can replace the IRS, the income tax, the payroll tax, and many other taxes. Jobs would come rushing back into this country and it would become the main tax haven for worldwide investment. Go to fairtax.org There are about 80 co-sponsors of the Fair Tax legislation now in the House and Senate. Personally, I only am contributing to candidates who pledge to co-sponsor that legislation....HR#25 and S#13....


Glen F in Camarillo, Ca
Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 11:18 PM

I've said it before and I'll say it again; every Conservative that talks about the job numbers needs to use the U6 number, which is the total number of unemployed including those not looking for work. It's needs to be drilled into the heads of every potential voter between now and Nov.


WorthNoting in Washington
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 12:15 AM

Romney? Really? :-O

Tweedledum and Tweedledee.

No real difference that I can see.

Blame the poor - jobs sent offshore.

So take their vote - scape that goat.

Obama or Romney? Golly gee.

No real difference that I can see.

Flip-flop. Sayin' first one thing and then another.

Servants of corporate global interests like all the others.

Political illusions. A pretense of choice.

We the People got no voice.


Ester Paisley in Utah
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 12:44 AM

It is simple! The poles don't reflect the qualities of the candidates ---- They are reflective of the qualities of the people polled as a whole!!!


David Bray in Independence, MO
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 12:58 AM

BHO came into office with only one goal in mind - Destroy everything American. It stems from his intense level of anti-colonialism. And he will lie, cheat or steal to accomplish his goal. Thanks to our educational system and disreputable media we have a dumbed down electorate that believe what they hear and ignore what they see.

BHO is challenging the electorate: "What are you going to believe - Me or your lying eyes?"


Brenda in Rexburg
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 7:50 AM

Barack Obama has a powerful ally that will help elect him and that is the main stream media. They are the enemy within. They present the news in such a biased way and unfortunately, that is the only news the majority of the voting public gets. It is even at the local level. I have never feared an election like I do this one.


Nelson Whipple in Charlotte, NC
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 7:59 AM

Redistribution is not the correct description.. It is the destruction of wealth through the degrading of success.


cree in Wyoming
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 10:17 AM

For over a decade I've come to be skeptical of polls. In recent elections the number of them has grown. Maybe someone knows, but how do they fund their operations, or in other words, following the money, I fear will not be reassuring.

Mark's mention of the left media, most of us know is corrupt and poll manipulation seems to be an extension of the media. The pollsters past accuracy records give our only basis for integrity.

Considering the populace fears from the economic distress, if a large portion of the electorate is counting on govt. security, if really true, Obama's real "hope and change" is the govt. dole to entrap, enslave the fools who will ensure their power.

How the left thinks this continued slide into obvious societal catastrophe is compassionate is beyond reason. Its insanity being played out in reality and history gives it no credibility. Obama has offered nothing to indicate but more of the same rather than direction to reverse the nation's health by every category of measure.


Keith Carr in Corpus Christi TX
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 12:03 PM

This nation is history. Too many have been hoodwinked into believing the lies of the communists and the globalist powers that be. Actively plotting my permanent escape from the USA. HEADLINE NEWS: The government cannot and will not save us from ourselves.


UGA67 in Herndon, VA
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 1:32 PM

Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay, 19th Century English Historian, on American democracy, in a letter to Henry S. Randall dated May 23, 1857: “It is quite plain that your government will never be able to restrain a distressed and discontented majority. For with you the majority is the government, and has the rich, which are a minority, absolutely at its mercy. The day will come , when in the State of New York a multitude of people, none of whom have had more than half a breakfast, or expected to have more than half a dinner, will chose a legislature. Is it possible to doubt what sort of legislature will be chosen? On one side is a statesman preaching patience, respect for vested rights, .strict observance of public faith. On the other is a demagogue ranting about the tyranny of capitalists and usurers, asking why anybody should be permitted to drink champagne and to ride in a carriage. Which of the two candidates is likely to be preferred by a working man? “I seriously apprehend that you will, in some such season of adversity as I have described, do things which will prevent prosperity from returning: that you will act as a people would in a year of scarcity, devour all the seed corn and thus make the next year, a year not of scarcity but of absolute famine. There will be, I fear, spoliation. The spoliation will increase the distress. The distress will produce fresh spoliation. There is nothing to say to you. Your Constitution is all sail and no anchor.” “As I said before, when a society has entered on this downward progress, either civilization or liberty must perish. Either some Caesar or Napolean will seize the reins of government with a strong hand: or your Republic will be as fearfully plundered and laid waste in the twentieth century as the Roman Empire was by barbarians who came from without, and that your Huns and Vandals will have been engendered within your country by your own institutions.”

Appeared in the So. Lit. Mess., XXX (Mar. 1860), 223-228, and reprinted in the New York Times and the London Times. Also see Charles A. Betts, ''Macaulay's criticism of democracy and Garfield's reply,'' Open Court, XXXII (May 1918), 273-279. Also H. H. Clark ''The vogue of Macaulay in America,'' Trans. Wisc. Acad. of Sciences, XXXIV (1942), 237-292.

WE HAVE ARRIVED AT MACAULEY'S PREDICTION !


Esteban Cafe in The World 9ok, Singapore)
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 2:00 PM

Baloney. The reason the "independents" are skewing towards Msr Obama is because the pollsters are steering them to such in their polls. Over sampling of Democrats in your swing states misrepresent "independents." I have more faith in the American people--they're being told "All is well" when they live with lower earnings and see those who don't pay taxes enriched; they clearly know who is paying.

I predict a landslide win for Msr Romney. He is to Obama what Reagan was to Carter.


Tim Jones in Nashville
Friday, September 28, 2012 at 4:29 PM

Arm yourself with the facts and information, then make a prudent decision.


Richard and Cathy Mills in Willard,Mo
Saturday, September 29, 2012 at 12:48 AM

I,Cathy Mills worked for Hooked on Phonics 22yrs ago.It was during the Gulf War.I found out that half of the U.S. cannot read,write,or do arithmetic.How in the world can a nation survive when its people are uneducated and neither party seems to care.Reading,writing and arithmetic MUST be restored in our schools if we are to survive as a strong nation. Also lets bring God and the 10 commandments back.If we don't we will bring HIS judgement upon our nation as He did with the children of Israel.


Rich Wisneski in Enfield,CT
Sunday, September 30, 2012 at 10:09 AM

It's the press,new's people they won't say anything bad about our president since his buddy own's them they never will No Freedom Of The Press In The U.S.!


Robert in Alabama
Sunday, September 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM

Where is the America for those of us who despise this corrupt Socialist big government mentality ? America belongs to it's citizens so when "We, the people"no longer have a real representative honest government it's time to drive the Socialist out of our country! Voting and talking have failed because government runs and controls both the media and the voting. The entire system is a fraud on the sleeping sheeple. Out of 300 million people these 2 are our ONLY choices!


Dave Mather in Troy, MI
Sunday, September 30, 2012 at 5:12 PM

Start checking the facts and quit ignoring them. You should know by your neighbors who have lost ther job, have been told they may lose their job shortly, have had to move or lose their house, lost their home due to foreclosure, etc... This nonsense has been terrible for Americans and the economy. I am tired of seeing my property values going down. Obama needs to go and you are responsible for making that happen. You need to vote and vote him out of office unless you like paying for his families extravagant vacations! His idea of going green means you do it so he won't have to. That's like his philosophy for everything! It must be someone else's fault. But if he gets re-elected, then it is your fault!!!


Brad Hager in Florida Keys
Monday, October 1, 2012 at 9:28 AM

It makes me throw up in my mouth to be surrounded by good Cubans that have escaped the socialist/communist regime, and have personal stories that should scare the poo out of young people, yet these same young people (including the grandchildren of Cuban refugees) embrace the socialist ideals and heroes that should be our enemies.


Thomas Hull in Conn.
Thursday, October 4, 2012 at 3:08 PM

The inverse relationship between Obama's rising job approval ratings and the failing economic status reminds me of the business world where a CEO gets a huge bonus all the while his company is dying on his watch. The cancer is spreading uncontrolled...........


Wayne Elliott in El Dorado
Thursday, October 4, 2012 at 4:24 PM

Sounds like he read Amity Schlaes, "The Forgotten Man", which precisely underlines his essay. And Republicans always fall for the same trap.


Bonnie Fleming in Yakima, WA
Saturday, October 6, 2012 at 8:49 PM

We were conquered in 1947 by THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT.....which shut down any inquiry into what the government is doing...so they have had free rein to destroy america. Do you really believe Obama could have been HONESTLY elected? He may 'run' for office but the outcome is predetermined.

Wake up and smell the skunk cabbage.

Do your homework.

Bonnie Fleming


Rusty in Michigan
Monday, October 15, 2012 at 10:38 PM

I'm unabashedly a conservative, but all that is seen happening is not all that is happening. David Horowitz does not like him, but two of Gabriel Kolko's books are very telling. The first is on the railroad industry in America. I do not recall the title. The second is "Triumph of Conservatism." Now the title is wrong, but the facts are not. If one is defined as not making income one may not be taxed. FDR and his class created ways to avoid taxes. These are tax exempt foundations and municipal bonds. Fair tax sounds good unless you realize some need not declare all they earn. The rest of us do not have these avenues.

Lenin targeted the middle class not the upper class. Read Sutton's "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution."


Post a comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

required, displayed
required, displayed
required, not displayed