In response to
The 'NeoComs'

mark, i like the term "neo-com"; however, you will notice the striking similarity to the word that you coined it from, ie "neo-coN". the similarity is not just in the word; but in the REALITY that both produce. that reality being slavery under tyranny; one more fascist, the other more communist; both absolutest and totalitarian... BOTH enemies of a free people. let us not forget that it was gw2 that launched the ill-named "patriot act", basically reducing the constitution to toilet paper, that it was abe lincoln who authorized the scorched earth 'slaughter,butcher, and starve the white women and children of the south" killing spree of general sherman, and that obama is fond of all of the policies of both lincoln and bush; and impeccably promostes BOTH tyrannical styles. the only meaningful difference between neo-con and neo-com is that the first wants all welfare payments to go to israel and its other friends, and the latter wants all welfare to go to "poor people" everywhere, including here in the usa. BOTH systems REQUIRE totalitarian control to enslave and rob the working class to support their global expansionism and welfare; whether corporate welfare or the more traditionally thought of, "bleeding heart" welfare. so in the final analysis, the difference between neo-com and neo-con is about the same as the difference between and "n" and an "m" that is the only thing that differentiates the words, and the distance between them as regards the american people, is about the same as the distance between the "n" and the "m" on your keyboard... take a look. as for REAL AUTHENTIC AMERICAN PATRIOTISM, well that is on the other side of the coin altogther. come on mark, you post great founder quotes every day; dont you read them ?? or do you only read them through the lens of a zionist/walstreet/central bank approved magnifying(distortion) glass ?? jeff