Randy Sunderland
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 12:49 PM

As a second generation country newspaper editor, I respectfully disagree with your interpretation of the First Amendment, that it protects a free and impartial press. What it does protect is a press that is free from government control, and is unrestricted in its ability to report on the activities of government to its citizens.The press has always been partial in their coverage (consider how many papers are named Democrat, Republican, or Independent). The founding fathers often turned to their favorite paper to publish essays and letters (under anonymous pen names) to test public opinion.What our founding fathers hoped for was an educated public, willing to be widely read and able to thoughtfully engage in the public debate. The issue is not that we have partial media, rather that we have people unwilling to read from differing viewpoints and to form their own opinions based on numerous and varying sources.