Thursday Column
The Fundamental Transformation of Newsweek and America
Common Threads of Delusion and Demise
"During the course of administration, and in order to disturb it, the artillery of the press has been leveled against us, charged with whatsoever its licentiousness could devise or dare. These abuses of an institution so important to freedom and science are deeply to be regretted..." --Thomas Jefferson

Freedom of the press is codified in the First Amendment of our Bill of Rights ("Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of ... the press") because our Founders rightly understood that a free and impartial press was a vital component of Essential Liberty.
However free, the press has rarely risen to the challenge of impartiality, not even during earliest days of our Republic. Thomas Jefferson observed as president, that the nation's newspapers "serve as chimnies to carry off noxious vapors and smoke." With the advent of the 24-hour "news" cycle, the press has never been more partisan than it is today.
Hence in 1996, when we launched The Patriot Post, one of our primary objectives was to break the mainstream media's chokehold on public opinion. Since our inception, The Patriot has devoted much-needed attention to the threat that a partial press poses to liberty, even receiving the Accuracy in Media Award for Grassroots Journalism for our efforts.
The Leftmedia's threat to liberty has been perilous in recent years, while we've been at war with a formidable adversary -- Jihadistan and its terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan and other theaters around the world.
By way of confirmation that our foreign Jihadi enemy understand the power of the American Leftmedia as an instrument of propaganda, as do domestic Leftist politicos, consider this authenticated communiqué between Osama bin Laden's chief lieutenant, Sheikh Ayman al-Zawahiri, to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi at the height of Operation Iraqi Freedom: "I say to you: that we are in a battle, and that more than half of this battle is taking place in the battlefield of the media."
In the midst of that critical period for OIF, one of the most egregious Leftmedia print propagandists, Newsweek, under the leadership of its (now former) editor Jon Meacham, ran defeat and surrender cover stories with headlines like "We're losing...", in which Meacham claimed the expertise to chart a retreat from Iraq before total defeat.
The unmitigated arrogance of such positions notwithstanding, surely Meacham understood that such cover stories serve only to embolden our enemy, which results in the deaths of America's uniformed Patriots on the warfront. Some call giving "aid and comfort" to the enemy, "treason." At best, it brands Meacham with the same stripes as Hanoi Jane Fonda.
Meacham, whose "golden boy" career was christened by a benefactor heiress of The New York Times, became editor of Newsweek in late 2006, 10 years into his stint with the magazine. He then promptly set about to transform the magazine into an elitist tabloid for those who want to read, in his words, "what I'm interested in."
MeachamOf that transformation, columnist Jeff Goldberg punned, "[T]he redesigned Newsweek. (Now with even more Meacham!)"
While dragging Newsweek deeper into the Leftist abyss, Meacham insisted, "We're not a partisan magazine. ... I am not a reflexive lefty. Far from it." At the same time, he editorialized, "Obama is essentially a centrist."
One trademark characteristic of most "reflexive lefty" elitists in media and politics is that their capacity for introspection is short circuited by pathological narcissism. Thus, they self-righteously believe they embody the "spirit of the people," and perceive themselves to be centrist, just much smarter than the masses whose devotion they desire.
Narcissists with Obama-like charisma can create a cult following among their devotees, which is sustainable until enough of them open their eyes and realize that the emperor has no clothes.
When asked recently, "Think of one of your least favorite people in Washington and describe what makes that person so unappealing," Meacham responded, "Total lack of self-awareness." At least he can see it in others.
Of his plan to fundamentally transform Newsweek, Meacham said, "It's hugely counterintuitive. The staff doesn't even understand it."
Apparently, it was so "counterintuitive" that Meacham's readers didn't understand it either.
According to Business Insider, "Newsweek's negligible operating loss of $3 million in 2007 (its first year under the Meacham plan) turned into a bloodbath: the business lost $32 million in 2008 and $39.5 million in 2009. Even after reducing headcount by 33 percent, and slashing the number of issues printed and distributed to readers each week, from 2.6 million to 1.5 million, the 2010 operating loss is still forecast at $20 million."
Consequently, Newsweek was sold this week to another Lefty, billionaire Sidney Harman (hubby to Leftcoast Rep. Jane Harman), who agreed to assume the glut of debt accumulated since Meacham took the helm. The winning bid? One dollar. No kidding. Given all the debt Harman took on, another bidder, Fred Drasner (former CEO of US News and World Report) quipped, "I think he paid a very full price."
I took note of the sale not because of Meacham's abysmal performance at Newsweek (most of the antique print media outlets are in financial trouble) but because 25 years ago I arranged payment of Jon's tuition at a very fine private high school that his family could not afford. At the time, he was a polite, adroit teenager, a Young Republican cheerleader for Ronald Reagan with a promising future.
While I had hoped that my investment in his education would produce a good return for our national heritage of Liberty and its extension to our posterity, I also realize that some seeds fall upon fertile ground and some upon the rocks. Instead of a stalwart constitutionalist, Jon, under the stewardship of various Leftmedia employers, lost his bearing and veered Left. (I recently wrote Jon and asked for a refund of that tuition, but got no response. Perhaps it was because of the salutation, "Dear Jon.")
Further, I was struck with the similarities between Jon's delusional vision to transform Newsweek as a microcosm of Obama's failed vision for the "fundamental transformation of America." Both visions reveal unbridled arrogance and an underlying contempt for those who are just not smart enough to see it their way, and both set a course for demise.
In a recent essay on Obama, Meacham wrote that if not for "a series of counterintuitive bets," he would not be president. Unfortunately for the nation, Obama's bets are meeting with the same disastrous fate as Meacham's bets at Newsweek. Fortunately for the remaining employees of Newsweek, Harman bailed them out, while Red China is bailing out (Read: "taking ownership of") America.
Thomas Jefferson concluded, "[T]he press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood," asserting that partisanship undermines the vital role of a free and impartial press in defense of liberty against tyranny. In the case of Newsweek, Meacham and company betrayed that trust, and his readers, like a growing number of Obama's supporters, unsubscribed.
46 Comments
Tim McCarthy
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 1:30 PM
I loved you comment regarding the transformational vision of both Meacham and Obama, that they both "reveal unbridled arrogance and an underlying contempt for those who are just not smart enough to see it their way ..." Much as Jon Meacham was ousted amid disgrace, debt, and dilapidated morale (I'm sure everyone at Newsweek is feeling just peachy), the same will be Obama's fate - amid disgrace, debt, and a dilapidated national morale. Like Jimmy Carter before him, we will need a real leader to articulate a "new" vision for America - the vision of our forefathers, and bring us out of this "malaise" that plagues us. BTW, didn't the Japanese "own" us during Carter's term in office? All is not lost! Be of good cheer!
Tom Mayo
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM
Thanks for doing what you do..........faithfully, day after day, you are one of the things that I read regularly in my quest for righteous information!!!!
Matthew Copley
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 2:07 PM
I have subscribed to The Patriot Post for sometime and usually enjoy the dose of liberty, but this article is IGNORANT. Your position of supporting the war in Afghanistan and Iraq is appalling, especially for someone that subscribes to the wisdom of the founding fathers. What happened to the quote that there is "no good war and no bad peace." Do your homework and you will learn that the founding fathers would have unanimously opposed these unconstitutional wars. Let's replace the worst two Presidents in our history (Obama AND Bush) with a REAL liberty President. Support Ron Paul in 2012.
Editor's Reply:
Lem
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 2:26 PM
Is there any way we can get Obumma out of office before he ruins this country? Maybe a Republican coup d' etat ? Lord, for the days of President Reagan !!! MAYBE THE MILITARY COULD...........But, let's not go there. Can we impeach him, or can you impeach someone for being STUPID ?
Greg
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 2:36 PM
I created an entry in Wikipedia several years ago and used the definition I first found in the Patriot Post with a citation pointing back to the page. It received some interest, was edited and updated for a time but has since been deleted. It appears the liberal press bias has infiltrated the self titled free encyclopedia.
Mark Hopkins
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 2:44 PM
Mr. Alexander.The problem is you paid his tuition to McCallie. Baylor it appears in hindsight would have been a much better investment.First Ted Turner and now Meacham. Is it something in the water at the base of Missionary Ridge?
Editor's Reply:
Brian
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 3:06 PM
Matthew,I think you may have missed the point of the article. Be that as it may, the person you quote regarding war and peace was no other than our own Benjamin Franklin. It was written in a letter to Sir Joseph Banks in July 1783, in which he hoped for more leisure days and bemoaned the waste of labors and fortunes on war that could have been devoted to improvements to infrastructure and society. Yes, war is a horrible thing, and wastes much treasure and lives. I ask you this, though: at what price Peace? Will you give up all your property for peace? All your liberty? Your life? All for peace?Those against whom we struggle with today, against whom we throw our lives and treasure, will only give you peace when you have completely subjugated yourself and your community to their Sharia law.Oh, you have to become Muslim, too.Is that a reasonable price? I suggest that none of our Founding Fathers would have so submitted.
T Davis
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 3:08 PM
Bravo, Mr. Sunderland! Indeed, Mark, the dissipation and demise of print publication is upon us, but due more to the rise of the machines, so to speak, than to the displeasure of discerning readers. The arguments continue in the ether and they are no more grounded in sense, logic and reason than they ever were. Perhaps the greatest failing of the founders of this republic was to place their faith in the education and wisdom of the average citizen, without making explicit provision for it. Back then, as now and for all the intervening years, the average citizen has had to devote the bulk of his/her time to survival by one means or another. Few have the luxury of sitting about the club and leisurely discussing the fine points of one philosophy or another or engaging in polite conversation about the relative merits of a large or limited federal government. We must get our information the old fashioned way. Second-hand after it has been digested and regurgitated for us to slurp up; after is has been pre-masticated by those with the time and education to understand the issues. We must rely on the output of others which leaves us at the mercy of the impartiality (or lack thereof) of the town crier, or newspaper reporter or talking head television newscaster who has enough skill, charisma or charm to appeal to our baser instincts and so grab our attention. The founders would have served us better if they had set standards and made provisions in the Constitution for national education. They should have codified knowledge as a right along press, religion and speech. Were we all taught the skills of discerning bovine feces from boot black I feel that we as a nation, a people, a society, would be in far better shape than we are now or have ever been. Yes, owning your own gun is important, every sane and responsible citizen should. But knowledge truly is the greatest defense against tyranny and oppression.
Eight by Eight
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 4:02 PM
Who paid Meacham's tuition bill to The University of the South, which he helped to rename as "Sewanee: The University of the South" while he was a regent? Alumni have never forgiven him for that error of "institutional advancement".
Jack Richey CPO, USN (ret)
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 4:14 PM
Thanks for your wonderful essay on Newsweek. I'm not sure how many of your readers are aware of the fact that that magazine has been reprehensible since at least the Goldwater-Johnson faceoff of 1964. An issue that summer displayed a cartoon by Herblock (no surprise). Herblock showed the Republican elephant straddling a chasm. Pulling the elephant's trunk on one side were conservatives. Pulling the tail on the other side were 'moderates.' The implication was obvious: conservatives were the opposite of moderates, hence immoderate, hence extremist. A more honest cartoon would have shown conservatives on one side, and liberals on the other. Just another glaring example of dishonesty run rampant in the leftist mainstream media. Please keep up the great work you're doing in the fight for liberty. GOD BLESS.
Roy Robb
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 4:24 PM
Sometime in the late seventies, I read a book purchased from the Conservative Book Club. I cannotremember the title, and no longer own the book. The foreword was an editorial about how great it was that the president was finally leaving town, etc., etc. My immediate reaction was that the editorial was about President Nixon. Much to my surprise it was about President George Washington.
Patricia DuFour
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM
I love to read your essays. Thank you so much for all of your hard work.
Brian Crook
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 7:23 PM
Newsweek: Since I've been living alone for quite a while, my mealtime company has been the daily newspaper and more importantly, the weekly magazines. So far, I've permanently dropped The New Yorker (sometimes great criticism, but too much Marxist commentary) and The Economist (outstanding coverage, but with a socialist mindset).I've accepted the renewal offers that may or may not cover the cost of postage, obviously offered to keep up circulation and hence ad revenues. With Newsweek lately, I've noticed, to paraphrase Gertrude Stein, there's no magazine there - only some leftish fluff and some off-beat "arts" plugs. Expires in December, don't plan to renew at any price. Similar fates await the other two.
Gregg Keyes
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 7:27 PM
So, if we truly believe that the Constitution protects our religious liberty ,and that it does NOT create a separation of church and state as advanced by the democrats, liberals and progressives such that we now ban most any dispaly or expression of Christianity, when will the real lawyers speak up?When will a Constitutional authority who is also well versed in semantics, break down the sentence structure of the Constitution and take the case to court. Why do we sit back and whine about the destruction of our way of life but do nothing of substance about it. Why do we allow the atheist, the immoral and our enemies define what is and what isn't.?gregg
Brian Crook
Thursday, August 5, 2010 at 7:29 PM
"Fundamental Transformation"This may turn out to be a powerful lesson in "Be careful what you wish for".It seems we are headed for a bloodbath for the business-as-usual beltway politics. In addition to a Tea Party takeover, we may see adoption of the proposed 28th amendment, and even, pray God, repeal of the 16th and 17th.All of this rightly can be laid at Obama's door. So he will have achieved his promise of "Fundamental Transformation"!