Time for Obama and Holder to Go
Barack Hussein Obama -- otherwise known by Godly Americans as a constitutional violator and full-time narcissist who puts his feet on the desk in OUR oval office -- has overstayed his welcome. We loaned the desk to him on January 20, 2009 for only four years to be treated with respect and reverence. Over these past three plus years, it has become obvious that he is a respecter of nothing but his own reflection.
His numerous breeches of constitutional law and his go-to-hell America attitude have enraged and alienated the decent folk who were willing to give an arrogant impostor a chance to serve America in her time of need. Servant he chose not to be -- in spite of his oath to the contrary, he has elected instead to appoint himself the Caliph of Washington.
This self-appointed Sultan/Caliph has arrogated to himself and his mistress all the amenities we would have been willing to dole out had he been half a man and not a penchant for misuse of all the services at the disposal of a legitimate Chief Executive.
Mr. Obama has overstayed his welcome, overstepped the bounds of decency and I for one have no hesitation in telling him to get out. He has bulldozed his way into a dictatorship, a Fascist activity that deserves the most severe penalty a dutiful Congress can impose -- impeachment -- and a one-way ticket to any other country that will accept him.
We the People simply have no more stomach for a lying artist with the morals of an alley cat, intent on doing this country great and possibly irreparable harm. His latest unconstitutional gambit is really the last straw; he cannot be allowed to serve out his full term, and walk off into the Hawaiian sunset with a pension.
Despite John Boehner's tearful protest, "We don't have enough votes to impeach him," at least one member of Congress must do that which is necessary; drop Articles of Impeachment in the hopper. Then dig up every bit of malfeasance, criminal activity, breaches of Oath of Office and violations of the Congressional Ethics manual on every Democratic Congressperson who would likely oppose impeachment.
Neither Obama nor Eric Holder has earned any respect while in office. Both have misused their authority, conspired to undo all that has been accomplished to eliminate the racial divide that most Americans, Black and White were beginning to accept as a new norm in terms of respect and cooperation. Both Obama and Holder are in direct violation of their Oath of Office by failing to respect and enforce The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (Pub.L. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419, enacted September 21, 1996, 1 U.S.C. § 7 and 28 U.S.C. § 1738C).
Both Obama and Holder in a blatant display of racism, failed to incarcerate or otherwise discipline two confessed members of the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation during the 2010 election.
Mr. Obama has single-handedly set back the moral standards of The United States by his unilateral misguided, elevation of homosexuality to a place of pseudo-respectability totally out of character, time and place and absolutely contrary to those moral and ethical standards set by or forbears beginning in 1607.
Obama has said that he is a Christian, yet his acts belie that professed membership in the faith of our founding fathers and mothers. His actions and slavish obeisance to leaders of the Muslim world here and abroad suggest that he has remained a member of the world of Islam since an early age. His open and frank denial of his white mother, Ann Dunham, places him squarely in the realm of black racists.
Mr. Obama's claims to the United States Constitutional scholarship are unproved, unrealistic and unacceptable. He shows a decided lack of Constitutional knowledge and a continued practice of nonconformity to that revered law. One obviously incorrect and purposeful misapplication of constitutional law occurred on April 23, 2010 when SB 1070 was signed into law. Immediately thereafter, Obama and Holder, before thoroughly reading and studying the law, declared that Arizona had no authority to involve itself in immigration law. Both stated that immigration was within the sole province of the federal government.
We the People delegated to the federal government, the control of immigration. In the case of our southern border in particular, the federal government failed abysmally to keep illegal aliens from crossing into Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California. These aliens posed an unsustainable hardship on the health and human services of those states and others into which illegal aliens had migrated.
The management of foreign immigration has long been a function of the federal government. For just as long, since the Immigration Act of 1924 which was based upon a formula involving National Origins. It was abolished by The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Hart-Celler Act, INS, Act of 1965, Pub.L. 89-236). As usual, the new act had a political agenda: "In order to convince the American populace -- the majority of whom were opposed to the act -- of the legislation's merits, its liberal proponents assured that passage would not influence America's culture significantly. President Johnson called the bill 'not revolutionary', Secretary of State Dean Rusk estimated only a few thousand Indian immigrants over the next five years, and other politicians, including Edward Kennedy, hastened to reassure the populace that the demographic mix would not be affected; these assertions would later prove wildly inaccurate."
The manipulation of immigration numbers by country of origin and culture has been for some two hundred years a political football. There have been numerous abuses by corrupt politicians. The improper and intentional interpretation and application of Constitutional Law by self-serving Presidents and their Attorneys General can and have been a frightful disservice to literally thousands of deserving and qualified individuals longing to immigrate to the United States. Corruption has been rampant within the system as anyone can imagine.