Grassroots Commentary
The Unmasking of a Counterfeit President: Part II
Hawaii, like every state, can only issue a truly certified birth document by following the rules that had been in place since the invention of photographic reproduction of birth records. Since micro-photography was invented about 150 years ago, it has probably been in use a very long time.
That process resulted in "a true & correct copy" of the original record. The heads of the departments of records signed their signatures on the copies and stamped them with their state government embossing stamp. Looking at that copy you knew exactly what the original looked like, but in negative.
The copy was certified to be a "True Copy" of the original. But now no true copies are issued, -only abstracts composed of extracted information.
The so-called certification is now merely a digital reproduction of all the text (and form structure) that the original contains minus the presence of the paper it was typed on.
That digitized form, on a transparent field without any background, is over-layed on the image of security paper as its new background. When printed it constitutes an abstract version of the original, -not an abstract copy, because abstracts can't be called copies. Copies are copies, while abstracts are abstracts. That is why the Hawaiian registrar's signature stamp "certifies" that a birth certificate "is a true copy or an abstract." Not a true or abstract copy.
The stamp's statement is a travesty against true certification because you can't certify an "or" statement as being "the" certified truth since there's no way to know which it is, -a true copy or an abstract? What exactly is being verified & certified? Certification statements can never be vague nor ambiguous. They must be exact and accurate.
They can't claim that it might be a true copy since they no longer have a need nor reason to issue true copies. If they did, then they would be following some arbitrary non-standardized protocol by which they might issue either one for no particular reason.
What's wrong with issuing digital abstracts as certified copies? Birth Certificate fraud. Digital data can be exported, and altered imperceptibly. With a fake birth certificate you can obtain a U.S. passport and pass yourself off as an American citizen.
The amount of fraud in Puerto Rico in recent times was so bad they had to invalidate all the birth certificates in the territory and issue new ones that couldn't be counterfeited with a desktop computer and laser printer.
It must have been quite easy to make fake ones because they had a similar or even worse system of issuing abstracts which were open to photo-shop digital manipulation of text.
So the so-called "Verification of Birth" letter is not in any way a verification of the White House pdf because the pdf is not a copy of an original hospital birth record, nor a scan of a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth, -it's just an image of something that looks just like one, but then counterfeit money also looks just like the real thing, as does an image of real money viewed on a computer monitor. Instead, what's verified is that the information matches what is in the (digital) files.
Hawaiian officials released a statement in 2008 that said in effect that Obama's record was handled no differently than any other record, which means they never checked the paper records, just what appears in their data-base.
Oct 31, 2008 Statement by Dr. Chiyome Fukino:
Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai'i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures. No state official, including the Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawai'i.
That very carefully worded statement, written by a lawyer to protect them from making a false statement in an official capacity, tells us, (those able to read between the lines), that what they have seen and verified is only that which is "on record", meaning information, since records are not "on record", statements and data/information are held "on record", -they have a record of it (the supposedly original information) which is retained " in accordance with state policies and procedures."
The information "on record" is recorded and maintained according to their policies and procedures in the form of a digital data-base accessed via computer terminals.
So instead of them trekking to their warehoused archive of 50 year old ledgers and searching for Obama's original papers, or searching through their vaulted micro-film records, all they did was sit at their own desks and call up Obama's file image, and then attest that they had seen "the original birth certificate." They avoided any explanation of what that meant.
What they saw on their monitors was no doubt just what they were supposed to see after it had been sanitized of any entry that would have been embarrassing or proof of ineligibility.
With the data-base abstract image altered to protect Obama's legitimacy, the Obama acolytes in the Hawaiian Health Dept. could claim with a straight face that they have personally seen the information "on record" and it "indicated" that Obama was "a natural born citizen" -even though no court has ever ruled specifically on what that term means, -although it elucidated the principle of natural citizenship in the case of Inglis v. Trustees of the Sailors' Snug Harbor, 28 US 99 (1830), yet they are ready and willing and eager to offer their expert constitutional law insight. How perfectly neutral of them, -how strictly objective and factual and scholarly and authoritative. We don't need to determine the truth of the matter for ourselves. They have spared us from the effort by doing our thinking for us.
12 Comments
Anton D Rehling in Olympia, WA
Thursday, August 9, 2012 at 5:10 PM
yeah lets see his student transcripts from his college days.
rab in jo, mo
Friday, August 10, 2012 at 9:08 AM
BO's background gets more than a pass from the MSM, they are complicit in perpetrating this fraud, vilifying anyone who dares challenge their messiah.
How difficult is it to trace the true origin of BO's 042 (Connecticut) SSN? Didn't his Grandmother work at the Honolulu Courthouse? Think maybe she had access to records that could be manipulated? With her radical leanings and known associates, would she be willing to falsify documents to benefit her grandson? But no, we won't investigate all that, because we just don't want to know...
Folks, it's darn well time to get the pitchforks and torches out and demand answers.
Adrien Nash in Crescent City, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 5:00 AM
Obama's grandmother worked in a Honolulu Bank. She eventually became its manager. She is presumed to have had the opportunity of handling some financial matters connected to the deceased gentlemen from Connecticut who had moved to Hawaii and later died there. His social security number could have been appropriated on behalf of Obama Jr. by his grandmother since he eventually began using it. That's a theory that might explain his using the number that he uses.
Dane in Chile
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 at 6:15 PM
The question that evades most is this: why would a person need to use a falsified or stolen SSAN? The anwer is simple: because he could not get one in the normal fashion. Now, why would that be?
Paul in California
Friday, August 10, 2012 at 11:56 AM
Minor vs. Happersett the US Supreme Court held that - "it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
The Supreme Court has given us meaning of Natural Born Citizen and this is the same meaning that was used during the vetting process for John McCain - Senate Resolution 511 "Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States."
The MSM, Congress and Executive Branch are laughing at us.
rab in jo, mo
Friday, August 10, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Laughing at us why? Because there is a Kenyan town that claims to be BO's birthplace? Or is it that there is an actual Kenyan birth record of one Barack Hussein Obama? Or is it because we refuse to accept the claim that BO's mother magically flew back to Hawaii just days before giving birth at a time when women in late-term weren't allowed to fly? The court case you cite uses the term "citizens" - notice the plural form of the word. BO's father was clearly not a US citizen. Neither was his stepfather - so when Soetoro adopted young Barry, did Barry then assume his stepfather's Indonesian citizenship? How did a US citizen travel to Pakistan in the early 80s? Did BO or did he not apply for admission to Occidental College as a foreign student. (If not a foreigner, then he is guilty of fraud.) Please explain how someone supposedly born and raised in Hawaii would have a Connecticut SSN?
Holmes Simons in Tampa
Friday, August 10, 2012 at 4:54 PM
Sheriff Arpaio has proven without doubt that Hawaii is full of criminal politicians who have been issuing fake birth certificates to non-US citizens for years. If Goober claimed he was Japanese instead of a black son of an African goat herder, he would be history now. He is nagging African-American, that's exactly what he is. He is a low rent nagger without a woodshed.
Clark in Columbus, Ohio
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM
I think Ed Henry or another interested newsman or newswoman should ask the current resident, other than his extended family, of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in DC, what is the Choomgang, as represented by a number of pix published on the web.
These pix prove that scarce though they may be, his associates in this organization can be identified, unlike all the colleges and organizations Obama claims to have been associated with whereby incredibly few "colleagues" can even remember if he was even there.
It seems to me he was a proud member of said fraternal (non-sanctioned by the Greek system) organization, and therefore, in contrast, are Mitt Romney and now Rep. Paul Ryan considered deficient or otherwise less competent as presidential candidates than Obama & Co since neither were inducted in a cloud of smoke into this most elite of Society, the Choomgang?
These are important distinctions that must be defended and challenged as to which candidate is best suited to lead our United States out of the Obamanation championed by King Obama and his cadre of adherents.
What say you, America?
Adrien Nash in Crescent City, CA
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 at 9:34 PM
If Obama wins reelection, it will be because he and his ilk are very successful liars, and because the Romney superpac didn't return fire on an equally low level. A level that contrasts the younger years of Ryan and Romney with that of Obama. Imagine how damning the ads could be if they went full tilt in that direction. Will they mention his association with communists and American terrorist? If even his pastor of twenty-years is off limits, -then what relevant facts aren't off limits? Obama's background is rife with ridiculously questionable elements, with his fake birth certificate at the top of the list. But the "establishment" won't allow the facts to be shared on any of their platforms. We are governed and informed by cowards, socialists, and traitors to American constitutional law, and there's nothing we can do about it except vote the bums out.
Abu Nudnik in Toronto
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 at 10:39 PM
What a waste of time. A red herring. Concentrate on the issues. Obama was sworn in as president a long time ago. His father wasn't ever a US citizen. He isn't qualified yet he'll still run and he still needs to be beaten. This issue is a losing issue. Please spend your energies more wisely to elect Romney/Ryan in November.
Liam Murphy in Goodlettsville, TN
Friday, August 17, 2012 at 7:17 PM
The fake birth certificate is, quite simply, a losing issue. It has been effectively used as a diversionary tactic by skilled liars in the administration and the dissemblers in the media. If you haven't seen the film 2016: OBAMA'S AMERICA, go see it tonight. Take your friends and talk it up. It is intellectually brilliant as it side-steps losing hot-button issues such as the spurious birth certificate, while masterfully laying out the damning facts about Barack Obama's checkered, unvetted past and the extreme anti-colonialist philosophy reflected in his appointments and policies. Obama's cultural, religious, philosophical, and ideological influences from Kenya, Indonesia, Hawaii and Chicago -- the influences that shaped our Imposter-in Chief --are laid out in all their damning array and complexity. The producer of this timely and remarkable film is also the producer of Academy-Award winning SCHINDLER'S LIST, arguably the most important film against prejudice ever created. What must be shouted from the housetops is that Barack Hussein Obama is culturally not American and does not have America's domestic or global interests at heart, regardless of where he was born. Even the most liberal and ideologically-driven Democrats (John F, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, both Clintons, Teddy Kennedy, Kerry, etc.) were -- even though they all wanted to massively re-distribute wealth within our nation -- culturally American. Barack Hussein Obama is NOT cut from that bolt of "progressive" American cloth. Obama's dream -- from his anti-colonialist, polygamist, alcoholic and self-destructive father BHO, Sr. -- is to dismantle the political prominence and preeminent economic status of the United States globally. It's chilling to see the extent to which Obama's ideological agenda, clearly and unambiguously stated in his memoir DREAMS FROM MY FATHER, has been accomplished with his infliction of unprecedented, massive, destructive, crippling, and unsustainable debt -- and with the dozens of czars and other political appointments that completely by-passed Congress. The help of the complicit mainstream media and the enabling academy is an unquestioned and troubling factor. The vast damage already done will not be quickly remedied. But the great harm and unconstitutional damage can be acknowledged, and an awakened electorate can be resolved that he must be removed!
Sara Smith in Lake Charles LA
Sunday, August 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM
Re "Counterfeit Pres. Pt. ll: We've had these facts for months, so why do they sit in the confines of conservatives' laptops, going 'round & 'round, with no one acting on this? Gov. Romney has highly pd. P.R. campaign staff, but not using it. There should be no room for an imposter in a race for this or any other office. To continue to circulate this among "believers," is akin to preaching to the choir. Get this out to the masses via T.V. ads!