Grassroots Commentary
The God Particle: I Don't Think So
Arrogance is a funny thing. Not Ha Ha funny, but funny none-the-less. I was watching one of America's leading physicists the other day, a man made famous by his co-authorship of String Theory and made popular by his ability to make people without a scientific education believe they understand what he's talking about. He repeatedly made the statement that today physicists understand 99.9% of how the Universe works and that the .01% that was missing is the never before seen but previously postulated Higgs Boson particle popularly known as the god particle.
The reason he was on a popular news show was because other scientists in Switzerland had announced that they had found the ever elusive god particle by producing a mini-Big Bang in the world's largest cyclotron by smashing atoms together. The Big Bang is what atheist scientists have to call creation because all their evidence proves that the universe, just started. They have come to believe that at one moment there was nothing and then a split nano-second later there was everything. Since they find it impossible to believe that God merely said, "Let there be" and it was they instead have mentally manufactured the Big Bang Theory, which along with the Theory of Evolution is taught to every school child as if it were established fact.
The Big Bang Theory goes like this: once upon a time there was nothing except the tiniest of points that contained the essence of everything. They even say there was no time because time itself was nonexistent before the Big Bang. Then spontaneously this tiniest of points exploded and in a flash it expanded into gases and stars and planets and galaxies. Using rooms full of chalk boards these highly educated scientists prove that all of everything came from something: a teeny tiny point of compressed something.
They piously tell us all their observations prove this is so. All their chalk filled blackboards prove this is so. All their experiments prove this is so. And now after they have discovered 99.9% of the truth the production of the missing god particle absolutely proves it is so. Just give them a little more time and they will be able to tell us exactly how the universe created itself.
How nice.
Luckily there are these eloquent popularizers who are able to act as a verbal interface allowing the scientifically and mathematically challenged masses peek behind the curtain. It's a good thing because it is our tax money that pays for all their orbiting telescopes, cyclotrons, and blackboards. And since the majority of us are Christians who believe God created the world it's convenient to have someone to explain to us why all the money we spend proves we are actually deluded provincials with a quaint faith in an unseen Father who created and upholds everything with His word, wrote a book to tell us about it, and then sent His only Son to die at our hands for our redemption.
Now that is money well spent. Pay billions and billions to have scientific shamans to tell us that what we believe are fables and what they believe is fact. Maybe we should spend our billions on magic beans instead, and then we could climb up to heaven and find out what really happened. Or maybe we should build a tower that reaches into heaven so our priest-king-scientist could give God a physical, and then tell us all about why He isn't there.
Our super smart highly educated and well financed scientists tell us they don't operate on faith; instead they operate on logic and objective evidence. Yet when you examine their chain of thought and peer into their evidence it is a fabric of conjectures based upon one leap of faith after another. They have convinced themselves the air castles they have constructed are more than science fiction, but why should we believe them? They do sound sincere and they do act as if they know what they are talking about, but so does the flim-flam man who tries to sell us the Brooklyn Bridge or the politician who tells us they can manage the debt and give everyone everything.
For one thing their very confidence that they have the universe 100% or even 99.9% figured out ought to tell us these wizards aren't ever going to really give us a heart, or courage, and certainly not a brain. They may give us a medal or a degree and then explain how they are just what they promised when they aren't but they can't deliver on the real thing. When Toto finally pulls the curtain back will we then realize we have spent billions upon billions to supposedly prove fantasies labeled as truth when we have had the truth all along: God created the universe, and we are here because of Him, in Him, and for Him. That may be too simplistic for the wizards to believe but their flights of fancy ought to be too fantastic for us to swallow.
For instance all these grand theories of everything never tell us where the incredibly compressed point comes from. They never tell us how long the point was in a state of perfect equilibrium just hanging there in the nothing. They never tell us what would have caused the point to explode. Yet they try to tell us they have it all figured out. Go figure.
I find it comical that believing in an all-knowing all-powerful God who created everything and everyone is too hard for people to believe but when a highly educated, highly financed, and media savvy spokes model tells us that everything created itself millions of people nod their heads and stand in line to give them more money for more experiments and blackboards so that we can expand our knowledge to, what, 110%?
This all reminds me of two things.
One:
There have been other times when societies and their wizards thought they knew everything.
A man named Ptolemy once proved that the whole universe revolves around the earth. Eventually a complicated model was constructed by dedicated mathematicians and philosophers to demonstrate and prove how it worked. Galileo among others was arrested, tried, and convicted for saying the Earth revolves around the Sun. Once the alchemists knew there was a philosopher's stone that would turn iron into gold. At one point the leading lights of science knew the world was flat while Columbus knew he could sail from Europe to Asia in a straight line. In the 1890s scientists assured us we knew everything about everything. Now the Big Bang explains it all and the god particle is the key to understanding how nothing became everything.
Two:
All these theories of everything that eliminate God remind me of the story about a scientist who when asked where his computer came from didn't know so he said, "There was a pile of parts laying in a junk yard for billions of years and one day they were struck by lightning and out popped this computer." This scientist had a blackboard full of equations that proved he was right. He had spent billions of tax dollars conducting of experiments that proved he was right. And he sounded very convincing when he explained it all. His theory was accepted and taught in all the schools, so now our children can come home and tell us where computers come from.
And the cow jumped over the moon.
It also reminds me of the story about a scientist who said to God, "You're not so much. I've figured out how to create life in my laboratory."
"You have?" said God.
"Yes I have and I'm willing to have a competition to prove I can create life just like you," said the scientist as he wrote two rooms full of equations to show God how much he knew.
"Okay," said God as He stooped down, picked up some dirt and started fashioning a man.
The scientist picked up some dirt and started pouring it from one test tube to another when God smiled and said, "Hey! Get your own dirt."
Even if we can prove how something happened does that tell us why? Since every chain of events has to have a beginning our wizards have had to come face-to-face with "In the beginning." However, without faith they can't see the forest for the tree. So instead of giving God the glory for his creation they try to construct creation without a creator, which reminds me of the atheist who knows there is no heaven and prays there is no hell.
I love to listen to the wizards. I read their books and watch their shows. However, I march to the beat of a different drummer, "And if it seems evil to you to serve the Lord, choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord."
Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion. He is the Historian of the Future @http://drrobertowens.com © 2012 Robert R. Owens drrobertowens@hotmail.com Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens
16 Comments
Capt. Call in New Mexico
Thursday, August 23, 2012 at 3:54 PM
WOW! What a wonderful testimony! Thank you, Dr. Owens. Belief in creation is, in reality, fundamental to understanding our Constitution. The evolutionary lie has no answers to life's questions, and leaves no ultimate standard by which to determine truth. Without God, truth is declared by whomever has the most money, and thus the most political power. This is subject to change, and then truth also becomes subject to change. But Yahweh, who cannot change, is outside of time and space, and out of His mercy has given us a canon, a rule by which we can know Him. Thanks again!
Abu Nudnik in Toronto
Thursday, August 23, 2012 at 11:01 PM
And God said let there be light. And there was light.
This is entirely consistent with the Big Bang Theory which you have described and understood very poorly. There were not tiny points of light that spontaneously exploded. There was, it's postulated, a black hole that sucked a nearly infinite amount of matter and energy into an infinitesimal space. Something had to give. The result was the Singularity i.e.: the Big Bang. The physics confirms this through critical measurements of the speeds at which various parts of the universe have moved from a single point. This theory explains, it's true, 99.9% of all physics in our universe... but only from the moment of the Singularity and not before. No one can explain what the matter and energy was, the gasses because they were entirely lost in the Big Bang. One hole closed, another opened. But it sounds very much like something "void and without form."
This is in no way incompatible with the existence of God. Indeed, the great rabbi and thinker, Moses Maimonides wrote in the 12th century "...and the universe, which as we all know began from a single spark..." This writing is in tune with the Jewish idea of the Tzimtzum, the withdrawal of God to His inmost ineffable core, a place untouchable, unknowable, imponderable, only to leave in His absence, the Universe. Almost a negative image of the Big Bang.
That spark, that light, was God's Word and our world in one. This is because, unlike the animal which only knows the actual world and man, who knows both the actual and potential, for God the two are one and the same.
I don't know anything about the Higgs Boson particle but if your understanding of it is as poor as your understanding of the Big Bang, I guess I'd better look it up because I won't get an understanding of it from you.
No insult intended Doctor but if you intend to write about something, I think you have a responsibility to know something about it and not report erroneously.
demsarerats in Oregon
Saturday, September 1, 2012 at 3:14 PM
Abu, so right, science does not conflict with the existence of God, and to the contrary, predicts the existence of God in my view. As usual, the anti-evolution cranks complain that science can not explain everything about everything while using computers and other technology produced by science; I am still waiting for them to throw away their computers and start blogging via supernatural mechanisms.
superman in San Francisco
Saturday, August 25, 2012 at 12:10 AM
Evolution is proven fact. Look it up. That's why they have to teach it in schools, and that's why viruses change. The pope even said so you fool. Now the big bang has also been proven at the LHC with seeing the god particle. Science has proven creationists wrong since Galileo improved the telescope to show the earth was not the center of the universe or galaxy.
wjm in Colorado
Saturday, August 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM
Nice try in san fag cisco. there are so many holes in the evolution THEORY, that even Darwin espoused uncertainty. Yes, idiot, the earth is not flat, but science has many theories, and all theories are not written in stone, but warrant further study. I guess in san fag cisco you just make up your own facts out of total fiction.
rab in jo, mo
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 11:00 AM
Evolution within a species is true, cross-specie evolution is far from fact.
The only part that Darwin got right is that species adapt to their environment. Where the "scientists" have erred is in their theory of cross-specie transition. Just because the basic building block of DNA is similar between species, does not mean that an amphibian becomes a mammal. If so, there would be extant in nature many examples of transitional cross-species - but there are none. Dog DNA is dog DNA, cat DNA is cat DNA, etc. As it is written in Genesis - "each according to it's own kind."
Papal decrees have been proven wrong throughout history, which is why God exhorts us not to put our trust in the wisdom of man. "The wisdom of man is but foolishness to the Lord". Just look at what happened to the "scientists" that tried to build a tower to reach God.
Jesus said "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life". Know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.
demsarerats in Oregon
Saturday, September 1, 2012 at 3:22 PM
Rab, that is complete nonsense, how could “evolution within a species” be true without leading to the evolution of new species.
superman in San Francisco
Saturday, August 25, 2012 at 12:13 AM
Evolution is a proven fact. What does it take for you to look in an encyclopedia (since you won't look in a science book) and see for yourself. The pope even admitted it. Now the LHC has proven the big bang too. Science is our only chance to prevent (or postpone) our rapidly approaching extinction. You people are speeding it up.
wjm in Colorado
Saturday, August 25, 2012 at 12:56 PM
Extinction? maybe for your sodomites.........
rab in jo, mo
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Evolution is "Proven fact"?!
What's your evidence? Piltdown Man? Polar ice?? Carbon dating??? These are all either made up or proven to be flawed.
I don't reject science, I'm an engineer for crying out loud. Show me your proof or shut up. It's called Evolutionary Theory for a reason. There is actually more evidence in nature that supports intelligent design than evolutionary theory.
Gregory in Yakima Wa.
Saturday, August 25, 2012 at 10:37 AM
There are a lot of things that are "funny" if by funny you mean peculiar. It seems that most people who comment here are 100% for God. You seem so proud that you do. Liberals believe in God too, but they don't believe in your politics.
You don't have to reject science just because you believe in God. If you're a Christian you believe you're saved by faith. If you're saved by faith you don't need to discredit science. The big bang, god particle...so what?
You can believe the Bible is the inspired word of God but if you believe it is science you're being irrational. The Bible is a collection of folk tales and cultural artifacts. As a source of facts the Bible is of little use at all. Evolution does not threaten your belief if you believe God is responsible for all things.
wjm in Colorado
Saturday, August 25, 2012 at 12:58 PM
Thanks again for another installment of clueless diatribe from the sodomite in WA. Funny is the sad state of the insane liberal mind. Keep em coming queer boy.......
QJG in Queens, NY
Saturday, August 25, 2012 at 11:43 AM
Pope Benedict XVI said evolution was used as a tool by our Creator. That's what I've believed for many, many years, figuring it out all by myself. Evolution vs. the Creator has always been to my mind, pointless because there is not a need to pit one against the other -- they coincided. Why? Because you can't get everything, including the majestic order of it all, from nothing. The Big Bang was most likely the Creator's "burp" and done on purpose according to His divine plan. Only He will decide when it all ends, if He ever does.
Dave in Wyo-braska
Sunday, August 26, 2012 at 12:54 PM
No one has yet to answer this one for me, and I'm still daring anyone to try: If evolution, as you say, is a proven FACT, where is the evidence in the fossil record. One creature evolving into another would leave a trace SOMEWHERE. Micro-evolution has been demonstrated in the fossil record (also called adaptation). There is no proof of macro-evolution. If a crawling creature were to "evolve" into a flying creature, would it suddenly happen overnight? Would a lizard give birth to a feathered bird? If a lizard were to "evolve" wings through successive generations, there would be evidence in the fossil record showing useless appendages that were "evolving" into wings. Simple logic.
This book of "folk tales and cultural artifacts" actually has the answer to this question (so I guess that makes it rhetorical), but I still ask the question: Why are some people so hell-bent on trying to explain the origins of the Universe WITHOUT the presence of a Creator? Why do some people spend their entire lives, their entire fortunes trying to disprove the existence of God? What is so terribly BAD about believing in an all-powerful, all-present God?
Perhaps (as this book of "folk tales and cultural artifacts" states, very clearly) it is because a belief in a Creator would "punch a hole" in your theory that you are a big, bad, super-smart scientist who knows all and sees all? Could it also be because, as this same book says, "Men loved darkness, rather than light" because it "shines a light" on your dark, perverted ways?
If you ignore God, everything is OK. If you acknowledge God, you KNOW there are certain things that are WRONG.
As far as the origins of the universe are concerned, I'd say it is a moot point. The human race as a whole, for all our "scientific" advancements, is still just as evil as the days of Noah. We still haven't learned how to get along with one another; so please tell me why ANY of this shit matters?
P. Long in Texas
Sunday, August 26, 2012 at 5:50 PM
Bravo, Dave in Wyo-braska!! Good on you. The fruit fly is an absolute favorite for showing the proof of evolution because it has such a short life span and changes (or adaptations) appear readily. It just evolves and evolves and........all it ever is at the end of all the evolving is.......a fly. Micro vs Macro.
enemaofthestatistquo in GA
Sunday, August 26, 2012 at 9:23 PM
A dead fly...