Options
Can Freedom Survive or Is the Fix in?
· Thursday, January 12, 2012
The Republicans have a habit of nominating moderates who have served the Party well, or as the Soviets called them apparatchiks, or as they are called in Chicago Ward Heelers, or as they are called everywhere else Hacks. That is how they ended up with Bob Dole and John McCain. They had run for the nomination before and lost. They were loyal soldiers who then went on to support the nominee. And now, it was their turn. That is not a very convincing campaign argument: "It's my turn."
Another foolproof system employed by the Progressive Republican leadership is to let their friends in the Corporations Once Known as the Mainstream Media set the agenda and choose their candidate. The debates these Corporations hold are aimed at causing division and starting intramural fights, and the Republicans fall for it every time. The Progressive Media loved John McCain. He was their "Maverick." They just couldn't get enough of his "reaching across the aisles" until he had won the nomination, then he was the enemy. It was the same thing with Dole. Now they tell us every day that Romney is the only one who has a chance to beat Obama. They just keep loving on Romney, can't get enough of Mitt. Just wait until he is the nominee and see how fast he becomes the Wall Street fat cat who plundered millions of dollars and laid waste to middle class lives.
With their 24/7 news cycle and group-think barrage of negative reinforcement the media seeks to disqualify those they fear and promote those who will maintain the status quo.
Sarah Palin was disqualified because she is damaged goods due to media attacks that were over-the-top in viciousness. The Progressives simply couldn't allow a woman to rise to prominence that had really built her own career and accomplished things without riding on her husband's coattails or worshiped at the idol of the pro-abortion sisterhood. That would have jeopardized their grip on the gender gap.
Gary Johnson was dis-invited to most of the Media sponsored and Progressive controlled debates. He was ignored during the few debates he was invited to attend. His poll numbers were based on polls that didn't include his name as a choice. The Republican leadership turned such a cold shoulder to this successful two-term Governor he has left the Party and is seeking the Libertarian nomination for President.
In the last election cycle John McCain was the darling maverick of the Progressives and he valiantly led to a stunning defeat by a novice with obvious ties to radicals.
Ron Paul is marginalized and ridiculed because of his whacky far-out ideas and policies such as obeying the Constitution. The Progressives can't allow anyone to seriously consider a return to government created by a bunch of old dead white guys! No way! No how! To them that is absurd, so at every mention of Dr. Paul's name there is a snicker, a joke or at least a raised eyebrow. On every network both cable and broadcast his name is constantly followed by the conventional wisdom, "He can't possibly get the nomination" or "He could never win a general election." Thus Dr. Paul is condemned to only have people who actually listen to his positions and know the Constitution as supporters, and the powers-that-be are betting they are a minority in America today.
The talking heads of the ruling chatocracy tell us over and over that Representative Paul is unelectable. They treat his legion of loyal supporters with derision and contempt. They use loaded words like whacky and kooky to describe his positions. In other words they treat Dr. Paul and his supporters with the same fear and loathing they heaped upon the Tea Party. In the Paul campaign they see a real threat to their Neo-Con / Progressive stranglehold on power. Every other candidate will perpetuate the reign of the military/industrial complex and its freedom smothering empire of foreign intervention and phony money. If any other candidate wins it may mean cosmetic change, but it will also mean business as usual. With any other candidate the looting and plundering continues.
Nothing reveals the truth more clearly than this obvious attempt to steer America away from the one candidate who seeks a return to the Constitution: a return to limited government, personal liberty and economic freedom. And the greatest disappointment of all is Fox News. The major networks and the other cable news outlets ceased being anything except mouthpieces for the Progressive Democratic Party years ago. But Fox held out the promise of a fair and balanced approach. Their news anchors and reporters tried to live up to their credo and report the news allowing their viewers to decide. But in this case they have gleefully joined in the attempt to dismiss Representative Paul as a serious contender.
From their much respected former anchor and current chief political analyst Brit Hume, their chief political correspondent "Campaign" Carl Cameron to their current anchor Bret Baier this team which offered a hope of unbiased news uses every opportunity to malign and marginalize Ron Paul and his supporters. In 2008 it was merely Cameron who used loaded terms and sneers to ridicule Dr. Paul. In this election cycle the entire network has piled on the anti-Paul band wagon. Watching the lead up to the first votes was evidence enough. Though Ron Paul scored in double digits in every poll we were told it meant nothing. When he was near the top of polls his name wasn't even mentioned. Now that voting has started when he places 3rd in Iowa and 2nd in New Hampshire it is treated as a curiosity, an anomaly as if all those voters had somehow pulled the wrong lever. Shame on you Fox News for leaving fair and balanced behind.
The establishment does everything in its power to stop the one choice that might mean an end to their precipitous rush to the precipice of power. They believe they neutered the Tea Party in 2011 when they turned the new majority in the House to the dark side sustaining the old leadership, passing the Patriot Act, and raising the debt limit. They feel secure treating Ron Paul and his legions of supporters as kooks advancing unworkable ideas and antiquated principles.
Every election is important. This one is for the soul of America. Will we continue down the road to become just another social welfare democracy? Will the greatest experiment in human freedom become a kleptocracy where the perpetually re-elected shovel out sweetheart deals to cronies as the cronies shovel back contributions to keep them in office? Is our government just a huge money laundering scam with a printing press using a Ponzi scheme to keep the marks happy? Are we fated to become the sacrificial lamb on the altar of avarice and greed? The establishment says yes. Their news media fellow travelers say yes. What will we the people say?
Will we rise up and demand a return to limited government, personal liberty, and economic freedom, or will we the people meekly accept our assigned role as we the sheeple? Will the descendants of the founders wake up and reclaim their heritage, or will we believe the Progressive line that constitutionally limited government is an unworkable idea and that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is an antiquated principle?
Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion for Southside Virginia Community College. He is the author of the History of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com © 2012 Robert R. Owensdrrobertowens@hotmail.com Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
American Spectator Editor in Chief R. Emmett Tyrrell: "The Patriot is an indispensable resource for sound conservative opinion." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- William Murchison: Do You Care? I Don't
- Dennis Prager: Rational People Fear Big Government, Not Big Business
- David Limbaugh: Obama's Morbid Vanity
- Mona Charen: Is Your 5-Year-Old Transgender?
- Cal Thomas: The Citizen and the Government
- Thomas Sowell: Big Lies in Politics
- Arnold Ahlert: Illegal Aliens Get Billions in Tax Refunds
- Jeff Jacoby: Two Is Enough
- Rich Galen: The Real Issue Is Pakistan
- Michael Barone: Obama Pursues Higher Tax Rates, Growth Be Damned
- Burt Prelutsky: Random Thoughts About Romney and Race
- Edwin J. Feulner: A Budget Plan That Adds Up
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























Oathkeeper Scott
HOO-ahh, Dr. Owens! Compelling and clear.
Posted January 12, 2012 at 12:25:04 PM
wjmccrindle
Dr Ron Paul doesn't understand the dangers that Islam poses to the United States and the World. That thinking, that he doen't understand the danger, is dangerous, as Islam is about our destruction, and it can't be ignored. That is why Fox News will not stand behind him. Dr Paul has so much to offer in the domestic monetary policy and areas of governance, but when he talks foreign policy he is a lost cause. I hope he continues in the debate and can talk some Constituitional Sanity to the eventual nominee, but his ignorance of our place in the world is dangerous.
Posted January 12, 2012 at 12:55:43 PM
RSS Ronald Reagan
Did you see where Sen. DeMint of South Carolina recently took up for Rep. Paul and praised the economic issues he is raising in this election cycle?
Even though Paul is not my first choice for the nomination, I agree that there's unfair "piling on" towards Paul that I don't see being dished out to other candidates. I was very please to see someone of DeMint's stature essentially saying, "Back off! Can we please end the circular firing squad?"
Posted January 12, 2012 at 1:43:40 PM
Victor
Ron Paul is the only one that understand the situation my friend. Islam doesn't fundamentally hate Christians or Jews. It's when force is used to push theological concepts like Zionism that pisses them off. What doesn't Iran kill the hundreds of thousands of Jews already in Iran? They're treated- just like everyone else. Whatever hatred is towards America it's precisely BECAUSE of our foreign policy- and it erodes domestic liberty in terrible legislation like the NDAA. Senator Orrin Hatch voted for the NDAA- we ought to get rid of every politician that supports erosion of the basic right to public trials
Posted January 12, 2012 at 5:09:13 PM
A.R. Nash
The danger from radical Islam is unquantifiable. Since we've neutered their leadership and cut off most of their funding, the only major threat is posed by an Iranian nuclear bomb. But bombs must be tested before being used. That involves a process that takes time and replacement of the exploded bomb. That provides the world time to respond.
But the danger that is quantifiable is the endlessly increasing massive federal debt that is connected through time by a noose around the neck of the future citizens of the United States. The greater and heavier it becomes, the more forcefully it will strangle the future. Ron Paul is the only one speaking about that direct and growing threat to our economic survival. All the rest accept ever growing military spending that is out of all proportion to the threats that we face. Osama Bin Laden won without even realizing it because he caused our chicken little leaders to borrow us into bankruptcy, which was what Al Queda's goal was all along. We've done and are doing to ourselves the same thing that the Greeks have done to themselves. Such dire financial straights have no identifiable solution. From a financial stability standpoint, the world economy hasn't seen anything yet. Europe's debt could collapse the whole world financial system, which wouldn't be unthinkable since it's just a gigantic house of cards.
Posted January 13, 2012 at 4:37:13 AM
Big Red
The danger from radical Islam ('real' Islam, despite what the MSM would have the sheeple believe) is entirely quantifiable. The threat is a zero-sum equation with a binary outcome: Submit to Islam (outright conversion or subjugation through dhimmitude) or die.
One of the core tenets of Islam is a fundamental hatred of non-Muslims, but the incomprehensible ignorance of the politically-correct crowd has squelched any discussion of what 'real' Islam is all about. Islam most certainly hates, at a fundamental level, Christians, Jews, Hindus, etc. and it would not matter if we removed EVERY one of our soldiers from every foreign country, fundamentalists would STILL hate any and all of us whom fail to adhere to the rule of Islam. They do NOT hate us because of our foreign policy (our support of Israel, notwithstanding), they hate us because we are not Muslims, period.
Those, like Dr. Paul, who bury their heads in the sand and refuse to acknowledge the existential threat that fundamentalist Islam poses to the rest of the world are only serving to empower our enemies. In fact, the sooner that we (at the very least, our leaders) recognize that the fundamentalists of Islam ARE our enemies, the better off we all will be.
Anyone that claims that Islam is a religion of peace, or that there are 'moderate' Muslims, is either misinformed (thanks to the rampant political correctness that plagues this country) or willfully ignorant of the true nature of Islam.
-Proud to be an Infidel
Posted January 15, 2012 at 6:58:16 AM
wjmccrindle
@Big Red
Right on the money. Folks like Victor display their delusion straight from their indoctrination of the ministry of propoganda. Those who see the true nature of Islam know that this political system and all adherents cannot be trusted in any capacity to not do us harm. They seek either our demise or servitude. Victor claims the jews in Iran are treated just like everyone else, and that is a proven fallacy. If you are not a follower of the embodiment of evil, then you are no more than a slave and must worship in secret, or pay a tribute to islam. What cluelessness is displayed by Paul supporters.
Posted January 18, 2012 at 12:27:44 PM
Tara
Alright, I have a hypothetical question: If Dr. Paul were to select an intelligent, sensible, strong Foreign Policy advisor to come along with his campaign, with the idea that said advisor would carry that position in his Presidential Cabinet, and to whose wisdom he (Paul) would defer, would that remove the viable obstacle to your assessment of his qualifications to lead the country?
I ask because that seems to be the ONLY true sticking point for almost every conservative, anti-Paul commentator I've seen. Everything else that gets labeled "kooky" is small potatoes; e.g. drug legalization, etc. (Small potatoes because that sort of stuff should be determined at a state level, IMNSHO, and I believe Dr. Paul would like to see states' rights returned to them, yes?)
Thanks.
Posted January 18, 2012 at 8:16:39 PM