Monday Brief
Brief
The Foundation
"In Europe, charters of liberty have been granted by power. America has set the example ... of charters of power granted by liberty. This revolution in the practice of the world, may, with an honest praise, be pronounced the most triumphant epoch of its history, and the most consoling presage of its happiness." --James Madison
Opinion in Brief
The Constitution of the Left"Finding herself with a bit of time on her hands, Justice Ginsburg swung by Cairo last month to help out the lads from the Muslim Brotherhood building the new Egypt: 'I would not look to the United States Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,' she advised them. Instead, she recommended the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the European Convention on Human Rights. That's why the fate of the republic will come down to a 5-4 vote. Because four-ninths of the constitutional court think the American constitutional order is as déclassé as a 2006 BlackBerry. ... [I]f the establishment wants to invent a new 'right' -- i.e., yet another intrusion by government -- it goes ahead and does so. If it happens to conflict with this year's constitution, they rewrite it. The United States is the only Western nation in which our rulers invoke the Constitution for the purpose of overriding it -- or, at any rate, torturing its language beyond repair. Thus, in [the] debate on whether Obamacare is merely the latest harmless evolution of the interstate-commerce clause, the most learned and highly remunerated jurists in the land chewed over the matter of whether a person, simply by virtue of being born, was participating in a 'market.' Had George III shown up at the Constitutional Convention to advance that argument with a straight face, the framers would have tossed aside the quill feathers and reached for their muskets." --columnist Mark Steyn
Share your thoughts on the importance of the Constitution.
Essential Liberty
"Liberal commentators were shocked this past week when in three days of oral argument in the lawsuits challenging Obamacare, five Supreme Court justices -- a majority -- asked questions strongly suggesting they think the legislation is unconstitutional. ... [T]he justices are not the only federal officials who take an oath to uphold the Constitution. So do the president and vice president, Cabinet members and other appointees, and every member of Congress. ... That means that every federal official has an obligation to act in line with the Constitution as he or she understands it. And that doesn't necessarily mean obeying Supreme Court decisions. ... Clearly the two parties are divided on the constitutionality of the Obamacare mandate. Polls have shown large majorities of voters think the provision is unconstitutional, though one can wonder whether many have given the matter much thought. But they're certainly giving it more thought after this week and will likely give it more when the decision comes down. Voters can reasonably ask candidates for Congress their views on this and other constitutional issues and call on them to vote against measures they consider beyond Congress' constitutional powers." --political analyst Michael Barone

Government
"'I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers to be feared,' Thomas Jefferson once wrote. 'To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.' ... Remember the clash on Capitol Hill last year over raising the debt ceiling? It may have seemed like a huge battle at the time, but it was merely a holding action -- a rear-guard maneuver to buy a little time. Because which direction has federal spending gone since then? Up, of course, soaring toward new record levels and endangering our economic future. ... [M]any lawmakers seem content to make meaningless trims, not serious cuts. They act as if we can allow Social Security and Medicare spending to continue growing -- and growing -- on autopilot. They seriously think we can slash defense spending, yet continue fielding a world-class military. ... No, you and I aren't paying enough, that's the problem -- or so we're told. As if past tax hikes haven't proved, time and again, that government will quickly consume any additional funds, and then some. ... 'We must make our choice between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude,' Jefferson writes. 'If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy.' Lawmakers should heed the words of our third president -- and have the courage to steer us off the path of financial misery." --Heritage Foundation president Ed Fuelner
The Gipper
"This is the real task before us: to reassert our commitment as a nation to a law higher than our own, to renew our spiritual strength. Only by building a wall of such spiritual resolve can we, as a free people, hope to protect our own heritage and make it someday the birthright of all men." --Ronald Reagan
Re: The Left
"Once again [last] week, the president was out on the campaign trail bashing and oil and gas companies. And he continued to spread major falsehoods about this industry, which I guess is the polite way to put it. Obama is obsessed with oil and gas. He is a prisoner of the left-wing environmental groups. And really, he's extending his leftist class-warfare attack from rich people to successful oil and gas producers. What seems to have Obama especially steamed is the fact that the conventional-energy companies are profitable. Especially the five largest. So he wants to tax them. He then wants to redistribute their income to his favorite green-energy firms. Sound familiar? I don't know which is more important to the president -- the fact that he hates fossil fuel or the fact that he hates success. ... But President Obama is too busy spewing falsehoods to support his ideological agenda than to take account of the facts. And while he's at it, one of the greatest, pro-growth revolutions ever is taking place right under his nose. It's the oil and gas shale miracle, which if left unfettered will turn America and Canada into an energy-independent New Middle East inside of 10 years. ... Obama should quit the demagoguery, stop bashing oil and gas, stop taxing success and let our ingenious, creative, free-enterprise private economy spur America to a new generation of prosperity." --economist Larry Kudlow
Political Futures
"Obama is telling the Russians not to worry, that once past 'my last election' and no longer subject to any electoral accountability, he'll show 'more flexibility' on missile defense. It's yet another accommodation to advance his cherished Russia 'reset' policy. Why? Hasn't reset been failure enough? Let's do the accounting. In addition to canceling the Polish/Czech missile defense system, Obama gave the Russians accession to the World Trade Organization, a START treaty that they need and we don't ... and a scandalously blind eye to their violations of human rights and dismantling of democracy. Obama even gave Putin a congratulatory call for winning his phony election. In return? Russia consistently watered down or obstructed sanctions on Iran, completed Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr, provides to this day Bashar al-Assad with huge arms shipments used to massacre his own people..., conducted a virulently anti-American presidential campaign on behalf of Putin, pressured Eastern Europe and threatened Georgia. On which of 'all these issues' -- Syria, Iran, Eastern Europe, Georgia, human rights -- is Obama ready to offer Putin yet more flexibility as soon as he gets past his last election? Where else will he show U.S. adversaries more flexibility?" --columnist Charles Krauthammer
Insight
"It is a dangerous concept that men of the armed forces must owe their primary allegiance to these temporary occupants of The White House, instead of to the country and the Constitution to which they have sworn to defend." --General Douglas MacArthur (1880 - 1964)
Faith & Family
"Abortion is a feminist sacrament. The movie 'October Baby' just debuted on 390 screens and registered in eighth place [last] weekend, with an estimated $1.7 million gross. ... Naturally, the critics just couldn't judge this movie by artistic standards. It had to be savaged because it is so politically incorrect. New York Times film critic Jeannette Catsoulis bared her ideological fangs at this improbable movie: 'Not even a dewy heroine and a youth-friendly vibe can disguise the essential ugliness at its core: like the bloodied placards brandished by demonstrators outside women's health clinics, the film communicates in the language of guilt and fear.' Ouch. A celebration of life is 'essential ugliness.' ... Notice how the Times couldn't focus on the movie without imagining the horror of conservative state legislators reducing a 'woman's dominion' over the termination of unborn children, no matter how advanced the pregnancy. ... But if you do consider abortion a crime -- against God -- isn't that the kind of compassionate message Hollywood preaches regularly? Such is the militancy of this issue in Hollywood." --columnist L. Brent Bozell
Culture
"The former Charleston, S.C., black chief of police, Reuben Greenberg, said the problem facing black America is not racial profiling. He said, 'The greatest problem in the black community is the tolerance for high levels of criminality.' Former Los Angeles black police Chief Bernard Parks, defending racial profiling, said: 'It's not the fault of the police when they stop minority males or put them in jail. It's the fault of the minority males for committing the crime. In my mind, it is not a great revelation that if officers are looking for criminal activity, they're going to look at the kind of people who are listed on crime reports.' Are former police Chiefs Greenberg and Parks racist? According to the Uniform Crime Report for 2009, among people 18 or younger, blacks were charged with 58 percent of murder and non-negligent manslaughter, 67 percent of robberies, 42 percent of aggravated assaults and 43 percent of auto thefts. As for murder, more than 90 percent of the time, their victims were black. These statistics, showing a strong interconnection among race, youth and crime, are a far better explanation for racial profiling and suspicion than simple racism." --economist Walter E. Williams

Reader Comments
"I just wanted to say thank you Mark Alexander for such a well-written essay, Race-Bait Political Hustlers. I think you are absolutely right. I knew the minute Al Sharpton showed up this entire incident would be completely blown out of proportion with race rhetoric. He does know how to ignite a fire. I think there are a lot of similarities between him and our current POTUS. I will sure be glad when people quit falling for the act that both of these men put on so well." --J Tatum
"Trayvon Martin's shooting will not affect Obama's campaign. The issues are the economy, federal budget, and ObamaCare. By November this story will be forgotten and something else will be the media's focus. This story knocked Sandra Fluke off the talk shows and the front page." --Chris
"If our country is to be salvaged from the wreckage reeked upon it by Obama, this atrocity of a health care law will be struck down. If the conservative justices stay true to their beliefs, that the U.S. Constitution is the law of the land, ObamaCare will be nullified." --Jill
"Whether or not the Supreme Court 'kills' ObamaCare, Republicans had better get off their rumps and get very serious about constructing a viable and fiscally responsible health care program or we will still have BHO for another four years!" --Dick
"We will eventually have some form of socialized medicine, ObamaCare or not. The general public -- which includes the lamestream media -- likes 'free stuff' and they have no clue that 'free stuff' is not free. And when it is made 'free' its quality and availability will suffer -- and so will we." --Grant
The Last Word
"[I]t sure would be intellectually honest if more people started framing their arguments in the terms, 'I don't like freedom on this issue and here is why...' You pretty much never see that. I mean, gun control is an anti-freedom stance, but they never argue it that way. I think maybe that's why they don't understand how unpopular their stance is. The same thing with the health care debate. The mandate is an anti-freedom stance, but they try to say they're for more freedom by ending worries about health care, which is BS. One thing is freedom and one thing isn't; it's not debatable. Putting a gun to someone's head and saying,'You must buy health insurance!' isn't freedom and no one should pretend it is. It's okay to take an anti-freedom stance, you just should frame it [in] terms of why you think your ideas are better than liberty. And that will probably also help you understand why so many people don't like your views, as the left always seems to get caught off guard by that." --humorist Frank J. Fleming
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!
Nate Jackson for The Patriot Post Editorial Team
136 Comments
wjm
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM
Four/Ninths of the Supreme Court have such a huge confilict of interest with their view of and distain for the Constitution, they really should be impeached. A few of them will be replaced in the coming 4 years, and looking at the likes of Sotomayor and Kagan, Chairman Obamao and the Senate must be returned to the sane thinking of Constitutional Constructionists.
Don
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:14 AM
The United States Constitution is the best governmental document ever written. It has been the guidepost for this democratic Republic for over 200 years, and although under continuous assault by progressives since 1912, it is still a strong statement of the limits placed on our governments limits on invasion of our rights. It is now under the strongest assault to date. Are YOU going to stand by and do nothing to preserve your freedoms, or will you join those of us who are determined to take back our country and prevent a dictator from taking over? Congress?
DockyWocky
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:20 AM
The Constitution represents order.The left-wing despises order and loves chaos, where they can play things as needed with their situational ethics.The New Civil War isn't too far off and it is going to be Us versus Them, and the issue will be the COnstitution, or the lack of one.
Gayle McDaniel
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:22 AM
With knowledge, comes power. With the liberals' knowledge that most of our citizens nowadays have not been taught the importance of the Constitution in the establishment of our liberties (thanks to liberally run government indoctrination centers), they have goose-stepped all over our liberties as they take them away one by one. I am hoping that this egregious grab for power over us by greedy, power hungry liberals has at least awakened an innate sense in us that something is not right, and we once again arm ourselves with knowledge of what this great document, the Constitution, means to us in keeping our liberties, and our freedom from subservience to a central, all powerful government in Washington. If this happens, perhaps we can have some of our freedom restored to us. We can't allow any more to be taken from us or it will be too late.
George Bodenner
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM
As a retired naval officer with 32 years active service I am sworn to defend and protect the constitution of the United States and am willing to do so because I believe it is the most important document in the world now and hopefully for the future.What will it take to effectively "defend" our constitution from these nitwits who are attacking it?
Mark
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM
If we fail to restore constitutional rule of law in this country, and soon, the Republic is done. We are currently cruising down the highway to hell (rule of man)at breakneck speed. We need to find an exit fast!
Becky Lynch
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:25 AM
One thing the re-writers of our founding document seem to overlook is that honesty drives its function.
Elaine
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:26 AM
That some of the U.S. Supreme Court justices can even entertain the idea that the federal government has the authority to mandate individuals purchase insurance indicates how far this nation has lost all notions of liberty as well as pure common sense.
Jill
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:27 AM
When it comes to any government's documents; Our U.S. Constitution is the best there is - It is the very foundation of our country. Those who hold only disdain for it are the very ones who wish to enslave us to the government, like the liberals/leftists for instance.
Fernando R Arocha
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:27 AM
I am getting a bit tired of how those on the right portray our Constitution. You favor and endorse the Anti-Federalist side of things, the side which was NOT ratified as our Constitution, and then act as if others are against what was ratified. A prime concept of the ratified document was for a strong, central, authority, superseding states and individuals, in part as a check against factions.Now I am all for a real debate on how big that government needs to be, but you lose me, Publius, Hamilton a federalist, whose arguemnets won. Perhaps that flies with the un-informed. By all means, pursue your factional arguments, I agree on some of those, but please back off from presenting those as THE truth, because what you do there is to go against the document that I was sworn to protect with my life, that my two sons serve now to defend.
Bill S
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:31 AM
Doesn't it seem to you that since Ginsburg made these statements regarding our Constitution that she should be disbarred? Free speech if of the essence in our constitution, but a Supreme Court Justice making statements such as these, seems to me to be almost treasonous. She is supposed to uphold the constitution , not trash it as most all leftist liberals are doing today.
Russell Hollins
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:31 AM
We are still, mostly, a free nation. We must keep it that way. God's hand is written all over our Constitution. Even his scripture is on a lot of walls in Washington, DC. We MUST keep it that way.Most of the people in our government don't believein God the Creator or the Bible is as His Holly Word. We must be careful who we put in as our government leaders, RIGHT?
Steve
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Original intent is/was a legal principle which kept everyone honest. Imagine writing a will, then having it administered by people who change the meaning of all the words within the will (i.e children are defined as anyone who makes a claim against the estate, etc). Magically, it has become a "living document" made to say anything those in control may want it to say. This is why people used to hang judges and politicians....and other crooks, liars, cheats, and thieves. Republicans are just as guilty as democrats...so quit trying to stir up one side against the other...the contest is now to determine liberty or slavery...vote accordingly.
Robert A. Holloway
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM
If I and several millions of others had not revered our Constitution we would not have gone to war asvolunteers, and our language would have had other persuasions.
Shmuel Halevi
Monday, April 2, 2012 at 11:39 AM
It appears to me that since "the left" is shredding the Constitution, it is high time to shred "the left".