In response to
'Gun Free' Zones Are Often Anything But
Cynthia in San Francisco
Thursday, August 2, 2012 at 6:57 AM
Cynthia in San Francisco
Thursday, August 2, 2012 at 6:57 AM
The Patriot Post's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
Does that mean that if a terrorist planted a bomb, and it exploded, the private business would be responsible because it had a "no weapons" policy?
Or, what if a theater had a "weapons welcome" policy, and an armed gunman starting shooting, and twenty armed patrons started shooting first at him, but then at each other becuase of the smoke and confusion? Would the theater be responsible for the carnage due to its "weapons welcome" policy?