Hamilton in IL
Tuesday, December 18, 2012 at 11:33 PM

Craigclev,

The second amendment doesn't need to be explicit about the type of arms. I explained to you why that is. Maybe you could re-read what I wrote and try again. And please drop the "sportsmen" reference. OMG, you sound so naive. The right to keep and bear arms had nothing at all to do with maintaining rights to be sportsmen.

If the Founders didn't mean for the People to be able to counter our own military, then being under-armed next to the military wouldn't have made sense, and it also wouldn't have made sense for the Constitution to place limitations on the size of our military. Just because a country's military is "their" military, doesn't make the military a group of uncorruptable angels, always loyal to the People. World history has proven that.

Liberals will take a mile if given an inch. It's fools like you who are willing to give them that inch, and thus start us down the road to gun confiscation and serfdom. My calling you a brain-boy is the very least I can do considering the fact that it is your actions, and the similar actions of other compromising useful idiots, who will cave to the Liberals, and lose us our rights and our liberty. Go ahead and give up your guns but I take offense at your liberal attitude and voting actions that can obligate me to lose my gun rights.

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

required, displayed
required, displayed
required, not displayed