Craigclev in MT
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 10:01 AM

Rereading your previous posts is tedious and unilluminating but this one is pretty humorous. First off, your right to bear arms is already highly conditioned. You do not have the legal right to have automatic arms, explosive shells and grenades or even, as I pointed out before, a switchblade knife. You call me naïve and yet you are the one proposing gun ownership to hold off our own government. I can think nothing more naïve than the dangerous misconception that somehow owning a particular type of gun will keep you safe from arrest. Do you think you're going to hold off the US government with light arms. So did the people in Waco and the freemen here in Montana. It did not work out so well for them how you think it will work out for you? I'd be willing to bet that you do not even own a gun.

The vast majority of gun owners in the United States are sportsmen and the most legitimate form of gun ownership is for sporting and recreational use. Of course also home protection and for those who are not "well regulated"personal carry. The second amendment does not give Americans gone ownership rights to hold off or counter the US government and military. That is crazy talk and was not part of anyone's intent, founding fathers or not. That line of illogic is a recent invention of people who are definitely not patriots! The founding fathers gave us numerous mechanisms for changing our government. Armed insurrection was not one of those mechanisms they countenanced or provided for in the Constitution.

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

required, displayed
required, displayed
required, not displayed