The Right Opinion
Republicans Must Vote Against Raising Debt Ceiling or Face Political Annihilation
The Republicans surged to majority status in the U.S. House of Representatives in November 2010 thanks in large part to the support of many independent voters who shifted their allegiance to the GOP. But the party's candidates risk losing that support, and also losing the voter intensity and enthusiasm they would otherwise likely enjoy in November 2012, if congressional Republicans sign on to any legislative scheme that raises the federal debt ceiling. It's just that simple.
Polls indicate that most of those who identify themselves as either Republican or independent voters say definitively that they don't want the debt ceiling raised, regardless of what alleged remedy might be used to justify such action. Yes, they have heard the dire warnings in recent days of potential economic disaster, unpaid Social Security benefits and even elimination of their own personal credit cards if the debt ceiling isn't raised. They don't care because they don't trust these doomsday statements.
Specifically, they recall the TARP program. That's the congressional action that not only "saved" banks and automakers, but led just a few years later to record profits for those institutions. That's money that never reached the public.
Too many people still can't get a loan. Others are hounded by credit card companies if they are a day late in paying their bills. And Americans are still paying hefty prices for cars and trucks that must be fueled by increasingly expensive gasoline.
These voters simply don't believe the assurances of President Obama, particularly in light of his stimulus program that promised the nation an 8 percent unemployment rate that hasn't materialized.
The GOP leadership in the House has slowly come to realize that any deal they agree to that doesn't include major budget cuts -- which by necessity would include cuts to entitlement programs -- will result in a stunning rebuke from conservative and independent voters. After all, those voters put the Republicans in charge in large part to avoid slick compromise deals and halfhearted efforts to rein in spending.
But the GOP leadership in the Senate seems even now not get it. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's proposal to give Obama the authority to raise the ceiling is a nonstarter with most conservative Republicans. It smacks of game-playing and shirking the duty of making tough choices.
Senators who try to play the deal-making heroes on this one will destroy not only their own credibility, but that of the entire Republican Party. Instead, they must remind Americans that the nation would not be facing this crisis were it not for the Obama administration's unbridled spending.
I completely understand what is at stake here. If the United States fails to raise its debt ceiling by Aug. 2, we face a serious devaluation of the dollar across the globe, a dire threat to the nation's overall financial status and possibly even an inability to pay entitlement benefits for seniors, and for Medicaid and welfare recipients. Of course, all this is theoretical.
The reality is that a majority of Americans are prepared for a few days of pain to prove to the world that we can and will find a way to control our reckless spending. Polling conducted earlier this year indicates that a majority of Republicans and independents would support a government shutdown akin to those of late 1995 and early 1996.
Why? Because they've adopted as their own the concept put forth in the early days of the Obama presidency by then-White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel -- namely, that one can take advantage of a crisis and put it to maximum use in achieving bigger and broader aims.
But Emanuel's crisis-exploitation formula was to swiftly spend boatloads of money. The Republicans' counter-solution should be to take advantage of the government's fiscal crisis by allowing the nation to suffer for a few days while Congress and the president sober up from the past two years of spending and make the tough cuts in spending that must be made.
There is another hidden reason why most Americans are willing to endure the pain of bumping up against our nation's debt ceiling. They see their own financial circumstances as being so bad that they don't see a downside to drastic action to stem federal spending -- especially if standing firm, at least for a while, will make those who profited from prior costly bailouts and stimulus efforts now have to share in the financial pain being felt by so many Americans.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

23 Comments
Peggie
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 10:41 AM
Your headline says it all. We put theRepublican Representatives in there torepresents us and if they don’t, we willlook around for new untainted blood toreplace them next election. As you say, it’s just that simple!
Harry Russell
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM
The same old scare tactics from the Democrats. Last month they were saying Grandma was being throne over the cliff. Now she may not get her SS check on August 3.It has been stated plainly that the US has sufficient funds to pay the military, SS, interest payments. We don't have money to squander on Obama's trillion dollar schemes. I am ashamed of our government for the antics they go through and its about time it stopped.
Marcus
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 11:33 AM
stop all imported goods tomorrow. all those government checks that go to social security, welfare, disability, government employees, etc. have a large portion spent on goods at wal-mart and the like that come from overseas. minus walmart's profit, the rest goes overseas and to corporations who shelter that money.plus there's the money that we privately employed folks spend on imported goods. all of this money is in turn "loaned" to us by these importers like China who control all the production and profits in their country.oh, and let's not forget oil importers.follow the money.stop the imports.
Abu Nudnik
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 12:36 PM
Debt management is possible. A temporary rise in the ceiling for permanent and deep spending cuts resulting in a lowering of the debt ceiling to half its present height within 10 years is not something the voter would consider shameful.
Restless Native
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 12:43 PM
Whether or not it's going to hurt is irrelevant. Raising the debt ceiling is unacceptable. It's far beyond the time for government to shrink in size, reach and staff. I absolutely oppose any increase, regardless of "what they say." This would be the best thing America can do given a long range outlook of collapse and destitution if the raise the limit again. Kick out the FED... Back to the Gold Standard. Fire any elected official that doesn't support the will of the people.
John.Smith.
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 2:29 PM
I expect the republacrats to fold like a cheap camera.The haven't realized the times they are a changein.They seem to think that their line of b/s will continue to be tolerated.As for being harrassed by loan holders I for one can attest to that.My wife and I have a small loan with a bank.A while back we started receiving calls about paying our loana day or two before it was do. [we've never missed a payment] And there is a 10 day grace period after the due date.I was in the kitchen one day when we had gotten our forth or fifth call I grabbed the phone out of my wifes hand and told the gentleman at the other end of the line.If they ever called about our loan we would cease paying the loan on time.And take full 10 day grace period.Or pay it and the late penalty well after the loans due date.That was almost two years ago.We haven't heard from them since.
MNIce
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 3:20 PM
Marcus, how will banning imports do anything about the Federal government spending 46% more than it takes in, or running up deficits exceeding 10% of the earnings of everybody in the nation? It is not the personal spending decisions that is the cause of the problem, it's the spending by the politicians "on our behalf". Banning imports will only reduce the variety of goods in the marketplace and make everything more expensive.No, we must address our own productivity problems. Our Federal and state governments are grossly over-sized and they meddle in our businesses far too much. Excessive taxation and unnecessary and over-powered regulations drive up the cost of making goods here far beyond the competitive range. Part of the problem for the heavy industries is that federal rules stack the deck in favor of labor unions, and the unions are too greedy and short-sighted to let their customers ("management") stay in business with competitive labor costs.
David Horn
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 3:26 PM
This entire debate rests on the assumption that the U.S. government will default if the debt limit is not increased. As a prior commenter pointed out, there is more than enough revenue to service the existing debt, which is all that is necessary to avoid default. As long as there is no default, not raising the debt limit only means that the government can only spend the revenue it brings in.However, I don't trust the government, and ESPECIALLY not this administration, to make the necessary adjustments to avoid default, if it comes to that. Instead, I fully expect Obama to intentionally default by continuing to funding his voting base's pet projects until there is no money left for debt servicing, and then blaming Republicans for not agreeing to his further destruction of the economy and the American way of life. Since major media outlets more closely resemble Pravda than legitimate news sources, I give such a scheme a better than even chance of success.
MNIce
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 3:32 PM
A short-term increase in the debt ceiling is acceptable if and only if it is part of a plan to permanently cut federal spending below the current revenue levels. The increased borrowing must be used only as part of an orderly reduction and elimination of unconstitutional federal spending programs.Otherwise, we'll have to force Mr. Obama to do a cold turkey shutdown of his spending addiction. He should have started doing that back in May, when we first officially passed the debt limit, but no, like any addict, he is irresponsible in his habit.I'm sure if any of us could take his place as President for a day, we'd call up Congress and demand a bill canceling appropriations for specific agencies. Check out USdebtclock.org - we have enough revenue to cover debt payments, defense, most of Social Security and Medicare, and the federal pension fund. We can't do all of that and "income security" also, so the rest of the unconstitutional welfare programs have to go to the "states respectively, or to the people" where they belong in the first place.
Al Hall
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 5:10 PM
The question has been asked by many: If President Awesome's intent was to destroy the American economy, what, of everything he and the Weinercrats have done, would he do differently? Hmmm? So now, I have to ask: "What if the supposed dire consequences of a government default are exactly what he wants?"
M Rick Timms, MD
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 5:36 PM
But wait!! Obama said we don't need to worry about all this ecomomic stuff - we should leave it up to the "Professional politicians"!The arrogance of this guy is amazing.All money bills originate in the house - so lets see a bill that prioritizes 1) Interest payments2) SS and Medicare 3) miltary. Everything else gets a 10% cut across the board, as needed to stay below the ceiling.If they raise the ceiling -- they Will spend more.Remember, they are the Professional Politicians.We must dismantle the spending power of the Federal government, by stopping their ability to confiscate the fruits of our labor -- American labor -- from all of us that are working ( and willing to work )for a paycheck. It is not the Governments money!
Howard Last
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 8:09 PM
I seem to remember somebody by the name of Bush saying "read my lips no new taxes". Someone should remind McConnell that Bush was out on his a## because of it when he raised taxes.
Bill
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 9:45 PM
This is the best commentary I've read in a while. Outside of educated idiots, everyone understands that when you are in a hole... you stop digging.
David S. McQueen
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 9:53 PM
Good comments, all, but remember that Obama does not care a whit for the USA or for its fiscal health. Obama only cares that he can further a socialist agenda and that fiscally kneecaping the USA will enhance that agenda.
enemaofthestatistquo
Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 10:00 PM
the Debt Ceiling is to be reached on August 2. If the checks do not arrive on August 3 then it was a willful, purposeful, & deliberate Malfeasance, dereliction, & High Crime & Misdemeanor impeachable offense of the Obama administration- because those checks, to arrive on the 3rd must have been processed and mailed or sent EFT before that date.