The Right Opinion
Deadlier Than Irene
WASHINGTON -- Some have described Hurricane Irene as "the most over-hyped event in history." Americans in the Northeast who were flooded out of their homes and businesses and those without electricity, fuel or water don't agree. But a U.S. official I spoke with this week told me, "The next storm coming from down south is already deadlier than Irene, and nobody is paying attention."
My source wants to remain anonymous because he is not authorized to talk about these matters with the media. He doesn't work for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency or the National Weather Service -- and he isn't talking about Hurricane Katia, now approaching the U.S. mainland from the Atlantic Ocean. He works for the Drug Enforcement Administration, and he says, "Our government has helped to create the 'perfect deadly storm.'" Sadly, his forecast is likelier to be right than anything from our weather guessers.
According to The Associated Press, Hurricane Irene claimed more than 40 lives and caused an estimated $7 billion in damage. That's just a fraction of the number of American lives already lost this year to overdoses on illicit substances and in drug-related violence. Estimates of the financial costs associated with illegal drugs -- criminal activity, lost productivity, medical treatment, rehabilitation and incarceration for those convicted -- are more than $215 billion per year. According to my source, "that's nothing compared to what's coming. It's about to get a whole lot worse." The facts bear out his dire prediction.
In the 1980s, Nancy Reagan was famous for telling kids, "Just say no to drugs." Today's first lady is on an anti-fast food campaign. In the 1990s, the Clinton administration increased funding for the DEA and started Plan Colombia to deal with the tons of cocaine coming into the U.S. The Obama administration has reduced funding for both. As president, George W. Bush enforced a zero-tolerance policy for federal workers using illicit drugs. Now the White House and Justice Department refuse to enforce federal narcotics laws against those with a "prescription" for medical marijuana or for "user amounts" of drugs in the possession of criminals. And now Americans' insatiable appetite for mind-altering chemicals, psychotropic substances and hallucinogenic vegetation is threatening the stability of entire nations.
Illicit drug trafficking and human trafficking across our southern border have reached unprecedented levels. Violent criminal gangs directly connected to Mexican drug and extortion cartels kill and maim nearly 1,000 Mexican citizens every month -- a level of violence well beyond that experienced in Iraq or Afghanistan. The carnage is wrecking any hope for normal life or economic activity in Mexican society and prompting a new flood of desperate "refugees" across our border.
Last week, members of the vicious Los Zetas cartel firebombed a casino in Monterrey, Mexico's second-largest city. The attack incinerated 52 people inside the building. Mexican counter-narcotics officials say the attack was intended to "scare the casino's owners into making payments for protection." This week, more than 130 schools in Acapulco did not open because teachers have been threatened with "execution" by drug gangs if they show up at school without paying the cartelistas 50 percent of their salaries for protection.
But it's not just Mexico. Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador and Costa Rica in Central America are now under siege, as well. All of these countries are enduring a dramatic spike in violent crime -- particularly unsolved homicides and kidnappings -- and, of course, government corruption. In Honduras, the Sinaloa cartel perpetrates gruesome "extortion murders" to impress upon reluctant farmers and businessmen the "necessity of paying their protection tax."
Chuck Holton, my friend and fearless cameraman who has accompanied me on multiple trips to cover our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, has just returned from Guatemala, the scene of grisly violence against farmers who refuse to plant the "specialty crops" demanded by gun-wielding drug dealers. Holton said: "The Guatemalan government is struggling to mount a response against the infiltration of hyper-violent Mexican cartels that have moved into the northern reaches of the country, where they cultivate marijuana for export to the U.S. Often the drugs are shipped in Agency for International Development grain sacks in a truly surreal form of recycling."
The Obama administration, so proud of its "contingency planning" for Hurricane Irene, appears blind to the growing "drug storm" already overwhelming our southern neighbors. The U.S. Justice Department, paralyzed by allegations of complicity in allowing thousands of firearms to be "gunwalked" into Mexico, is busy trying to deflect blame for an "operation" gone terribly wrong. We can only hope that the O-Team looks south to the darkness on the horizon.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

8 Comments
JTG
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 11:05 AM
They won't. Can't cut off BHO's supply.
PDK
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM
Col., as always great job.I have been for building a wall on our southern border since 1999. It was Pat Buchanons idea from back in 1992. It may seem cruel, but it is not. I believe, all things considered, it will in the long run improve matters on both sides of said wall. Not only will a wall stop the illegal immagration and their policy of taking more than they give, not only will it stop the process of diluting our natural political stability by proping up the socialist democrats, but it will take a large chunk of the illicit drug trade away. Most of the liberal mindset, the immatured, exspress desires for an end to the war on drugs, and a lazia fare approach instead. I would remind people what happened to China when GB forced opium on them, they almost lost their country.When talking a wall, I am talking a statement wall, one that would dwarf the great wall of China. Equiped with all the modern gizmos to sense out tunnel building. One so large our millitary could conduct operations upon, drive humvies, pillboxes, lookout towers and stations ecceterra.America cannot expect our current President, Obama, to do anything for America, as he was raised to be the anti American Messiah. His breeding was to destroy America, mostly through socialism, but also with an Islamic helper.Our SHS, Janet Napalitano, who, as govenor, did nothing for Arizonas illegal immagration problem, but complain that it was Washingtons job, is now Washington herself, but is once again passing the buck with bull and baloney such as our borders have never been so secure as now. She is irresponsible, she is a coward, and just as with Jimmy, who had the same traits, America pays the price, will we ever learn. What was that adage about sending a boy to do a mans job?Unfortunately we Americans choose our leaders via democracy a totally enfranchised democracy. Total democracy is just better than no democracy, it is a drug given to placate the citizenry. Democracys evil side shows when the majority of voters vote for immature, insane leadership, and the country is destroyed from within.I keep my body clean of parasites and cancer cells, this allows for optimum performance by my body. Perhaps we as a culture should keep our democracy clean of the same parasites and cancer cells that prevent optimum performance by our country. Perhaps this is the "Holy Grail" ticket that will return our America back to being America once again. Thank you.
Jon
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 2:31 PM
PDK:You talk as is the U.S is a democracy.A democracy is where 50.1 % of the population controls the other 49.9 %, literally rule by what the mob wants today.The U.S. is a Constitutional Republic, a nation of laws. Laws can be changed but not at the whim of the mob. There is a process which must be used to change laws, not just a majority vote that may be different tomorrow. The country was always referred to as The Republic until the First World War when progressive and liberals started talking about democracy. Thomas Jefferson feared that the U.S. might become a democracy, and from the looks of things his fears were well founded.
PDK
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 2:50 PM
Jon, thanks but I am aware that we are a Constitutional Republic and not a democracy, that is why I said we CHOOSE OUR LEADERS THROUGH A TOTALLY ENFRANCHISED DEMOCRACY.I do not talk as if the USA is not a Constitutional Republic, I talk as though the means through which we pick our leaders, A TOTALLY ENFRANCHISED DEMOCRACY, is killing our country.You sir, are stealing my point to make yourself look superior, do your own work. The smell of liberal is disgusting and today I do not need it from someone who is supposed to be a fellow conservative. Thanks, but today no thanks.
Jon
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 4:02 PM
PDK,I was not trying to steal your point, rather, I was expanding a point you brought up in your post. As for conservative, I am a member of the Constitution Party- not very liberal. Best regards,Jon
John Sutherland
Saturday, September 3, 2011 at 12:59 PM
If our "Messiah", the all knowing, all seeing President is so wise, why is he so blind to the border and drug problem we have with our southern neighbors? Yes, it is sadly true that too many Americans support the illegal drug problem with their addictions, but stronger support of securing our borders from the drug trafficing and entry to the U.S. of illegals would certainly be a step in the right direction. Will this happen? Probably not under this administration. Anybody want to guess why?John L. Sutherland, COL, U.S. Army, (Ret)
Merry Colin
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 5:49 PM
And how much has the completely ineffective war on drugs cost? PROHIBITION DOES NOT WORK as proven over and over again! Spend half of that money on securing our borders and we might see a real change, including a drop in trafficking.Wilson gave us income tax. FDR gave us SS. Johnson gave us The Great Society welfare programs. Nixon gave us the war on drugs. Bush gave us the Patriot Act. Obama gave us "healthcare". Only good thing about Carter is that once he left, most of his impact was gone. Before you jump on my case, yes, every one has left some legacy but none as great as those listed above.
sean harvell
Tuesday, September 6, 2011 at 12:49 PM
oh yea, kinda like that guns/drugs/guns campaign with the contra's, huh