The Right Opinion
Obama as Demoralizer-in-Chief
So just when everyone had concluded the Chris Christie matter -- saying, "Great speech at the Reagan Library, but he's not gonna run for president" -- the New York Post comes along with a story that says the New Jersey governor is seriously considering a 2012 run.
Apparently the Reagan Library experience had a big impact on Christie, and others. He's now being urged to go for it by Nancy Reagan, Henry Kissinger, former president George W. Bush and former first lady Barbara Bush.
According to the Post story, even Christie's wife Mary Pat is warming to the idea.
I don't have anything to add to this in the way of a forecast. But it does give me a hook to weigh in on Christie's speech. It was uplifting and inspiring. As many have commented, it was a Reagan leadership speech on exceptionalism, or "earned American exceptionalism," as The Wall Street Journal editors put it. I agree.
There are a couple a points that I want to emphasize, though.
First, Christie gets the linkage between domestic economic growth, national security and foreign-policy influence. This was an absolute key Reagan principle.
Reagan's firing of the PATCO workers was heard around the world by the old Soviet Union. But it was Reagan's tax cuts, limited government, deregulation, disinflation (with Paul Volcker) and free-trade policies that grew the economy by nearly 5 percent annually during the recovery period of the 1980s, with nearly 20 million new jobs added. That ultimately knocked out the Soviet Union. (Throw in deregulated oil prices, too. They decimated Soviet coffers.)
Second, at the Reagan Library, Christie talked about the New Jersey model, where in a tough war against government unions and teachers, divided government worked to reform the state's pension and health benefits, cap property taxes and hold down arbitration awards for union salaries. (Christie didn't mention this, but he also stopped the millionaire's tax in New Jersey.)
And while the governor said there was compromise on a bipartisan basis, and while he emphasized leadership in compromise several times in his speech, he noted that he balanced two budgets with over $13 billion in deficits without raising taxes.
So there's compromise, and there's compromise.
In New Jersey, Christie has set an example for the U.S. Congress. What he seems to be saying is that compromises should occur in the spending areas, with particular emphasis on entitlements and a general curbing of the public sector. That's a strong, positive message.
Third, Christie is a growth guy. He gets that. Numerous times in the speech the governor spoke about pro-growth tax reform along with entitlement reform and free trade. He came down on the side of the entrepreneur, not the government planner. And he said he'd opt for free-market reform in education. These are important policy markers if he decides to run.
Additionally, in what may have been the speech's toughest passage, Christie blasted President Obama for dividing the nation along class-warfare lines: "Telling those who are scared and struggling that the only way their lives can get better is to diminish the success of others ... trying to cynically convince those who are suffering that the American economic pie is no longer a growing one ... insisting that we must tax and take and demonize those who have already achieved the American dream ... is a demoralizing message for America." (Italics are mine.)
That helped make the Christie speech truly superb.
American economic psychology today is depressed and dispirited. It is, in fact, demoralized. And President Obama's contribution as a divider is a key part of this demoralization. Not the only part. There are other culprits. But a key part.
In effect, Christie has labeled Obama the demoralizer in chief. He is the first to do so. It was an exceptional addition to an exceptional speech.
I am not choosing sides here in the GOP primary. I am not endorsing. I am merely trying to report what I think is a very important political statement, one that should be incorporated into the various GOP campaigns and the national debate.
Gov. Christie is holding President Obama responsible. No excuses. And that, by itself, is a big contribution.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

4 Comments
Brian Norton
Friday, September 30, 2011 at 1:37 PM
As a CEO, on of the most important things you can enunciate and instill into your company is a clear vision of where you you want the company to go. Of course it must match the underlying strengths and mission that currently drive the company, or there will be cognitive dissonance and an inability to compete and produce. This is the precise situation under Obama: Where he wants to take America is diametrically opposed to where most of Americans want to go, so of course we are demoralized as a nation! Gov. Christie, on the other hand, knows what spirit burns in the heart and soul of average Americans, and can speak it with eloquent plainness. We are a nation of compassionate over-achievers who have been hijacked by socialist nannies who want us to be ashamed of our history and accomplishments. We do not want an apologetic, demoralized,Nannie-in-Chief: We want a leader who can show us, as Reagan did, how to use our founding values to attain to the heights of American exceptionalism again. Our nation is great: We should demand great leaders. Words matter, and a man like Cristie who can translate his words into actions is a far better solution to our myriad problems than a man whose only solution is to turn on his teleprompter again
Galen McPherson
Friday, September 30, 2011 at 3:39 PM
Demoralizer-in-chief; nannie-in-chief!! Love the commentary. And how true. Obama has become to America what Eeyore was to Winnie-the-Pooh.His only hope is to rally all of those who RECEIVE benefits from "his" government into class warfare with those who provide those benefits.9-9-9 makes sense, and fair share should be aimed at the bottom half, not the top 5%. Get fair!!
Richard Ryan
Friday, September 30, 2011 at 5:07 PM
I hope Christie does decide to run.I believe he is what the country needs at this point.He will not be everything to the voters,nor should he be.However;He speaks in a voice we can all understand, and I would hope if he throws his hat in the ring,all conservatives and moderates too will unite behind him.He would be a fresh choice.Richard RyanLamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman
PDK
Friday, September 30, 2011 at 7:40 PM
Thank you Lawrence, good job.Your essay was both enlightening, about Christies credentials and ideology, and uplifting. It is genuinely good to know America has this quality of character waiting in the wings. Though I must say America cannot wait much longer, liberal/democrat ideology has America rapidly approaching the the precipice overhanging the abyss. Perhaps Christie is the one, perhaps he will run.Because Perry is dismally performing, because Romneycare eliminates Romney, because Michelle Backmann is VP material, because Cain has a good message but is an outsider, Perhaps Christie will run, as a Pastor might say, "let us pray". Thank you.