The Right Opinion
The Republican Mole
In the Tea Party, there are wackos. No doubt about it. But they are the exception to the rule. On the other hand, in the case of the Democratic Party, they are the Democratic Party.
Black and Latino politicians like to focus on the large financial gap between their constituencies and white Americans. What they choose to ignore is the humongous gap in education. Although I regard the first four years of liberal arts instruction as an unholy waste of time and money, the way the system is set up, one has to slog through them before going on to become a physician, mathematician, architect, surgeon, lawyer, engineer or CPA. But when most members of the two largest minority groups in America don't even make it through high school, how on earth can they possibly wind up wealthy unless they are adept at hitting, shooting, running or passing, some type of ball?
It's not bigotry, as the race hustlers and assorted liberals would have it; it's reality.
Instead of comparing themselves to rich white people, they should compare themselves to the only minority group that editorial writers and various leftwing sob sisters elect to ignore; namely, Asians. In spite of coming to this country generally speaking a foreign language, they and their children apply themselves and, more often than not, wind up out-earning white Americans by out-learning them.
Roughly 50 years ago, Lyndon Johnson declared a War on Poverty. Several trillions of dollars and countless state and federal feel-good programs later, the poverty level is basically unchanged.
The situation in Africa, in spite of the well-publicized efforts of Matt Damon, George Clooney, Bono and the U.N., is even worse. Considering the cast of characters, a cynic might even say, predictably worse. According to a recent study, in the 1970s, 10% of Africans lived in poverty. Today, the number stands at 70%. God knows Angelina Jolie has done all she can, but she's only one person and she can't adopt an entire continent.
The fact is, the War on Poverty, whether in Kenya or Detroit, and just about every other war that the U.S. has waged since 1945 has been an unmitigated disaster.
Am I the only one who finds it odd that although liberals were constantly attacking George W. Bush because he didn't announce an exit strategy for Iraq, nobody ever demands an exit strategy when it comes to the unending wars on drugs and poverty?
On the other hand, there are a couple of wars that deserve to be waged. Both involve federal expenditures. Although they pale in comparison to the millions of dollars squandered on LightSquared, Solyndra and all those various "green energy" scams pulled off by Al Gore and Obama's major donors, they are morally reprehensible. For instance, when Eric Holder's Justice Department holds a conference, money is no object, so long as it's yours and not theirs. Cookies typically go for $10 each, a cup of coffee runs $8, lunch costs $65 and if anyone feels like a snack, it's another $32.
I haven't seen over-runs like these since the last time the Pentagon submitted a budget. It makes you wonder if Michelle Obama is running a catering service out of the White House.
The other financial scandal involves pensions that are paid to 15 former members of Congress who were convicted of felonies including tax evasion, drug possession and racketeering. The list includes 11 Democrats and four Republicans. One of the bums collects $96,575-a-year. All told, these 15 ne'er-do-wells pull down nearly a million dollars annually.
Wouldn't you think the pension rules would have been changed somewhere along the way, if only to provide Eric Holder with the wherewithal to order more cookies?
Finally, I have decided to make my play for the Pulitzer Prize, which has so far managed to elude me, by breaking the biggest news story of the year. It's time to reveal the fact that Barack Obama is a Republican plant. In 2008, the RNC realized that after eight years of George Bush, if John McCain was somehow elected, the party was doomed to go the way of the Whigs.
By throwing the election and helping to elect a former community agitator with close ties to unrepentant terrorists, Communists and a racist church, the Republican Party wagered that once he showed his true colors, the voters would come to their collective senses.
But even in their wildest dreams, the GOP never imagined that within two short years, they would pick up Ted Kennedy's Senate seat and elect a slew of governors and senators in Ohio, Virginia, New Jersey and Florida. When Bob Turner, a Catholic conservative, won the recent election in New York's predominantly Jewish 9th district, millions of champagne glasses were hoisted all over America toasting their favorite mole, Barack Obama.
It's ironic that in 2008, unsuspecting Democrats kept insisting that Obama was the Messiah. As things turned out, they were right. Who else, after all, could have raised the Republican Party from the dead?

57 Comments
Holmes Simons
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 9:27 AM
I raise my glass to the mole - on Obooger's nose.Moo doesn't need to cater. She would eat all the profits. Hey, what a great new Socialist program!She'd rather sit on her big cushion and collect her cut of the $4 Billion taxpayers gave to her friends to install sneeze guards for her MOVE initiative.
Army Officer
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 9:35 AM
"...assorted liberals would have it; it's reality."Ah... I think I found the problem. It's that pesky r-e-a-l-i-t-y again. We can't have that getting in the way of a nice, expensive, feel-good-but-make-the-problem-worse liberal solution, can we?As for African poverty, I think we may be dealing with an apples-to-oranges comparison. Certainly in the U.S. the definition of the word "poverty" is as elastic as Bill Clinton's definition of, well, anything. In the U.S., for example, we have the richest poor people on Earth. When the largest health risk to the poor is chronic obesity caused by too many calories and too much leisure time in front of the flat screen, your poor aren't really very poor at all.I wonder if the U.N. definition of African poverty has been similarly notched upward in the past 40 years. I'm not disputing that most of Africa is a dreadful place for the people who live there, mind you, and certainly the typical African is worse off now that the bulk of the continent is no longer under colonial rule, but it is VERY politically-incorrect to point out that obvious reality (Dang: I used the "R" word again).
JJStryder
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 10:14 AM
The wars that heve been waged since WWl all seem to follow the same pattern. Throw money and resources at the problem, ignore failed results, throw in more money and resources , ignore the human costs,....... begin again.....ad nauseum.....
PDK
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 10:44 AM
GM Burt.First on education, it has been part of my perception that blacks and hispanics dilibertely avoid a good quality education as part of their minoric zeitgeist.For blacks it is the entertainment world, government related, including welfare, or crime. Further where looser black leaders such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson disengenuously bewail the disparity of white and blacks in prison while never promoting the opportunities inherent and free, at the tax payers exspence, paid for predominately by the whites, in American education, the hispanics without looser leaders do their time in prison as a measure of their machizmo.It is the unspoken but well understood moto for both groups, we don`t do whitey, and an education is whitey. The girls are also beholden to the motto, though with them it is motherhood early and often that becomes their badge of honor.It is bad enough that the black leaders offer disengenuous leadership that corrals subtley but powerfully their flock into an anti whitey zeitgeist, but then to have the democrat party help with the continued corraling by rewarding both groups for their anti whitey zeitgeist with money wrongfully and immorally appropriated from hard working Americans and then given free to said flocks is an abomination and transgression of liberty, the American spirit and those that have earned their money. Worse still, this reward of free money helps hold blacks and hispanics to their cherished moto, it helps them stay in their corral, and in turn condems them to ignorance, welfare and crime.Some of the PP readers, and of course Burts columns may noy have notice, but what has become quite clear to me, I share with you, democrat and dirty rat are phonetically similar. This may be coincidence or it just might be meaningful coincidence. I believe it is meaningful coincidence for although a dirty rat is not a democrat, a democrat is surely a dirty rat. Thank you.
Dennis
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 10:46 AM
I kinda like to boast that immediately after the election, I said Obama would be maybe the best thing that has happened to this country since George Washington, because I expected his extreme positions and actions would wake us up. McCain would have done the same things, but too slowly for us to put our guard up, as has been done over the last 50 or more years. But I'll admit I was not sharp enough to realize he is a mole. Great insight, Burt. But, on second thought, are the Republican leaders sharp enough to have devised such a plan?
Fed Up
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 11:45 AM
Burt,Straight to the point and brutally honest as always!The truth hurts, doesn't it? But they don't want to hear the truth, they want you and me to subsidize and cuddle them because we are "rich white men." They seem to feel injured, entitled, as a result of history's past, and continue to pull up history as a means to garner sympathies and support. One doesn't have to be a genius to see where the problems lay for the minority populations you mention. One only has to watch TV, read the newspapers, listen to the radio, and look around to see who creates the majority, statistically, of the problems for themselves and for this country.Statistically, minorities have the higher prevalence of crimes, such as murder, theft, assault, domestic disturbances, armed robbery, and a host of other crimes. But many (liberals, Black politicians, et. al) will claim it is because of their station in life, that they do what they do and are the way they are.Often times you have to look within for the solutions to problems, but many seemingly look out towards others as being the problem, and their solution, to their woes and station in life. It is time to grow up and accept personal responsibility for your own lives, not continue to blame the white man and "system" for your problems.
Doktor Riktor Von Zhades
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 11:51 AM
"...nobody ever demands an exit strategy when it comes to the unending wars on drugs and poverty?"Quick little side thought; If the anti-tobacco nannies put as much effort (as they do in destroying the tobacco industry) into finding a way to effectively fight drugs, we'd probably not have that much of a problem....I do have a suggestion. It is not decriminalization of said licit substances, but instead of imprisonment, we not only take their drugs, but fine those (and not a small slap on the wrist fine, I'm thinking at least 5-10k) that are using said drugs? I know this would probably not be effective in some cases, (dealers and distributors)but for users, it does become a problem. Those that use and still hold a job, said fines could be either paid in full at the time of court hearing, or, if unable to pay at that time, will be attached to their wages. Of course the ACLU would scream it targets the poor and blah blah, and it's unconstitutional, but then again so is the confiscation of our own personal wealth in the form of income taxes. But I digress. For those that are not gainfully employed they can and WILL be forced to work at for the public good, cleaning streets, public toilets, soup kitchens etc, until fine is paid in full. Said payments will be charged at the minimum wage, until it is fully paid and discharged. Perhaps they can be fitted with one of those tracking bracelets? I don't know how this would fly in the face of most conservatives, but, it is something to mull over at the very least.
Richard Ryan
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 11:57 AM
In answer to Dennis`s question as to whether the Republican,so-called leaders, are sharp enough to devise such a plan; the answer is no as most of therm are about as sharp as a marble,which makes it very easy for them to roll over and play dead.God how I wish Chris Christie would get into the race!I think he would eat Obama`s lunch.Richard RyanLamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman
Ragweed
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 12:26 PM
PDK - Perhaps donating funds from the government largesse is a good thing, in a twisted but real sort of way. It's akin to protection money. Just think, by giving a monthly check to the flunkies who can actually work but don't, we are preventing a lot of looting and pillaging. If we take their checks away, we might have to declare martial law to attend to the defending and raping of our businesses and homes.Doktor Riktor Von Zhades - I have a better solution to drugs. First - if you are caught using it's automatically twenty years. Second - If you are caught selling it's life without parole. Third - If you traffic, or sell and cause a death it's death by public hanging. Wait a minuit......Let's combine the second and third with the penalty for the third. I bet it would work.
Burt Prelutsky
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM
Doktor & Ragweed: My approach to drugs is quite different from yours. At the risk of sounding like a fan of Ron Paul, I don't think it's anyone's business what people snort, smoke or inject. I would tax the stuff just the way we already do with tobacco and alcohol, but what I would do is not allow addiction to be used as a mitigating circumstance when the user commits a crime. Commit a crime while under the influence, you don't get to throw yourself on the mercy of the court, insisting that you're a victim. Your sorry ass is going to the clink, not a clinic.Burt
akaangrywhiteman
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 12:42 PM
@Doktor Riktor Von Zhades..."Said payments will be charged at the minimum wage, until it is fully paid and discharged."...More slaves for your plantation? How about we just take'em out and shoot'em. Get rid of all those nasty old court costs and later subsequent medical issues?At the very least? How apropos.
Ol'Joe
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 12:49 PM
I imagine to guarantee failure of any war is to let the government handle it. WWII was won, in spite of government, by the brilliance of American industry. The war on drugs and poverty have failed because government, without citizen help, is inept. It seems liberal government does not want drugs and poverty to end; both keep the masses stupid and voting for liberal fools who promise more. God help us, the Democrats will not!
Marcus
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 1:02 PM
I agree with Burt on his approach to the drug issue. Making it legal and taxing it does help remove the victim status. Also, treatment for addiction, even mild could be included on insurance policies, governmental and private.If we are serious about individual liberties then drug use falls under this umbrella. An adult should not be limited by law in his/her recreation choices based on others moral convictions or economic considerations. By economic considerations I mean big pharma running the US legislature when it comes to pot legalization. You wouldn't need those valiums or other legal goodies that insurance pays for if you can take a couple of puffs or have a brownie after that stressful day.We've created an underclass of citizens with these draconian laws that are ironically created by men who drink, smoke, and take pills.Fascinating, this country is. Fascinating in the way like watching a horrible car wreck in slow motion is fascinating...
Saint Peter
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 1:03 PM
Burt,With your Libertarian/zero-tolerance approach to drugs; you'd better be ready to build a lot of "clinks". A LOT of them. And staff them and maintain them. Were's all that money gonna come from?From the drug tax? Hmm... maybe.
Right Side of Ohio
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 1:11 PM
The Law of Racism:Racial Sensitivity is inversely proportional to the overall success of your culture