The Right Opinion
The Republican Mole
In the Tea Party, there are wackos. No doubt about it. But they are the exception to the rule. On the other hand, in the case of the Democratic Party, they are the Democratic Party.
Black and Latino politicians like to focus on the large financial gap between their constituencies and white Americans. What they choose to ignore is the humongous gap in education. Although I regard the first four years of liberal arts instruction as an unholy waste of time and money, the way the system is set up, one has to slog through them before going on to become a physician, mathematician, architect, surgeon, lawyer, engineer or CPA. But when most members of the two largest minority groups in America don't even make it through high school, how on earth can they possibly wind up wealthy unless they are adept at hitting, shooting, running or passing, some type of ball?
It's not bigotry, as the race hustlers and assorted liberals would have it; it's reality.
Instead of comparing themselves to rich white people, they should compare themselves to the only minority group that editorial writers and various leftwing sob sisters elect to ignore; namely, Asians. In spite of coming to this country generally speaking a foreign language, they and their children apply themselves and, more often than not, wind up out-earning white Americans by out-learning them.
Roughly 50 years ago, Lyndon Johnson declared a War on Poverty. Several trillions of dollars and countless state and federal feel-good programs later, the poverty level is basically unchanged.
The situation in Africa, in spite of the well-publicized efforts of Matt Damon, George Clooney, Bono and the U.N., is even worse. Considering the cast of characters, a cynic might even say, predictably worse. According to a recent study, in the 1970s, 10% of Africans lived in poverty. Today, the number stands at 70%. God knows Angelina Jolie has done all she can, but she's only one person and she can't adopt an entire continent.
The fact is, the War on Poverty, whether in Kenya or Detroit, and just about every other war that the U.S. has waged since 1945 has been an unmitigated disaster.
Am I the only one who finds it odd that although liberals were constantly attacking George W. Bush because he didn't announce an exit strategy for Iraq, nobody ever demands an exit strategy when it comes to the unending wars on drugs and poverty?
On the other hand, there are a couple of wars that deserve to be waged. Both involve federal expenditures. Although they pale in comparison to the millions of dollars squandered on LightSquared, Solyndra and all those various "green energy" scams pulled off by Al Gore and Obama's major donors, they are morally reprehensible. For instance, when Eric Holder's Justice Department holds a conference, money is no object, so long as it's yours and not theirs. Cookies typically go for $10 each, a cup of coffee runs $8, lunch costs $65 and if anyone feels like a snack, it's another $32.
I haven't seen over-runs like these since the last time the Pentagon submitted a budget. It makes you wonder if Michelle Obama is running a catering service out of the White House.
The other financial scandal involves pensions that are paid to 15 former members of Congress who were convicted of felonies including tax evasion, drug possession and racketeering. The list includes 11 Democrats and four Republicans. One of the bums collects $96,575-a-year. All told, these 15 ne'er-do-wells pull down nearly a million dollars annually.
Wouldn't you think the pension rules would have been changed somewhere along the way, if only to provide Eric Holder with the wherewithal to order more cookies?
Finally, I have decided to make my play for the Pulitzer Prize, which has so far managed to elude me, by breaking the biggest news story of the year. It's time to reveal the fact that Barack Obama is a Republican plant. In 2008, the RNC realized that after eight years of George Bush, if John McCain was somehow elected, the party was doomed to go the way of the Whigs.
By throwing the election and helping to elect a former community agitator with close ties to unrepentant terrorists, Communists and a racist church, the Republican Party wagered that once he showed his true colors, the voters would come to their collective senses.
But even in their wildest dreams, the GOP never imagined that within two short years, they would pick up Ted Kennedy's Senate seat and elect a slew of governors and senators in Ohio, Virginia, New Jersey and Florida. When Bob Turner, a Catholic conservative, won the recent election in New York's predominantly Jewish 9th district, millions of champagne glasses were hoisted all over America toasting their favorite mole, Barack Obama.
It's ironic that in 2008, unsuspecting Democrats kept insisting that Obama was the Messiah. As things turned out, they were right. Who else, after all, could have raised the Republican Party from the dead?

57 Comments
Jack
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 3:42 PM
And besides, not even mole can cover up some unmitigated horrors, like cat poop.
KN
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM
@Robert: "Okay, I've just got to ask: PDK, just what the hell are "loosers"?" "Loosers" are loose Conservatives otherwise know as RINO's. Liberals are just plain old losers as redundant as that is - with a nod to Howard.
Emcee
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 4:20 PM
Ragweed: I like your solution to the Drug Problem. Some of the other solutions presented here would only increase the crime problem. But the real answer to all of society's problems begins in the heart, with revival and a relationship with Jesus Christ.
Doktor Riktor Von Zhades
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 4:20 PM
@akaangrywhiteman"More slaves for your plantation?How about we just take'em out and shoot'em. Get rid of all those nasty old court costs and later subsequent medical issues?"Ummm, huh? Although your suggestion, might be effective, and has merit, I doubt it would fly. Burt I can agree to a degree, IF we can create a national penal system somewhere in the Aleutians, wherein said offender serves minimum 5 years. Let's face it, those islands are not exactly conducive to human comfort....Seriously, I'm not sure what you mean by my plantation. I don't have one, never have had one, and don't plan on having one. All I was suggesting was to hit drug uses in the pocketbook. We constantly hear the neomarxists complaining how the prisons are so over crowded with folks that have been caught with a seed. (not that I believe it), so I proposed a fine that would hurt worse than being in jail. Is that so bad?
akaangrywhiteman
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM
@Doktor Riktor Von ZhadesIt isn't the drug users that have a viable source of income that causes societies problems, so why fine them for paying for a habit they would have whether it is lawful or not. The biggest problem with most drug users is they don't make a viable living and as a general rule either live off entitlements or illegally by breaking laws against persons or property. If you wish to punish those individuals, punish them for the crimes against the person or property as severely as you wish, but the bogus crimes against the state laws should be done away with.The state uses crimes against the state to milk the public of money, case in point seat belt and helmet laws. Perhaps you feel safer with the state deciding what you should and shouldn't be allowed, I don't.As to the plantation mention, the state farms the people just as a dairy herder farms his herd.
d.w.hudson
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 8:10 PM
Mr. Haviland, I pray for gridlock! Unfortunately the Republican "leadership" is more interested in compromising principles than using the fiscal authority granted to our HOUSE to stop the democrat onslaught dead in its tracks. I would also be quite happy to settle for a Republican president whose interest was more engaged in STOPPING unconstitutional legislation than "doing something" to look good when the best course is to just leave it alone. The party "platform" I always look for is our Constitution.
Burt Prelutsky
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 8:14 PM
Holy cow! I leave for a few hours and I come back to a food fight. I believe Aaron Stovall answered ST. Peter on my behalf. Once we let everyone out of prison who is there on (non-violent) drug charges, we'd have plenty of room for new and more deserving inmates.Howard Reed: It pains me when someone pays me a compliment and I have to call him on the carpet, but how can you manage to misspell both my names in a single message. Bert? Pretlusky? What have I told you about drinking in the afternoon?Regards, Burt Prelutsky
enemaofthestatistquo
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 9:06 PM
RE: Dennis -ur post 1046am 10/3 "I said Obama ... maybe the best thing ... happened to this country since George Washington, because I expected his extreme positions and actions would wake us up. McCain would have done the same ..., but slowly..., as has been done ...last 50 ...years. But I'll admit I was not sharp enough to realize he is a mole. Great insight, Burt. But, on second thought, are the Republican leaders sharp enough to have devised such a plan?" Like any Politician, GOP sharp enough to take credit for such a plan.
enemaofthestatistquo
Monday, October 3, 2011 at 9:29 PM
RE: Fed up ur post 246pm 10/3, "Therein lays the problems. Socialism creeps upon us, they believe in patience and understand that 2 steps forward, and 1 step backwards, is how they attain their ends." Socialist-any Statist-Not Content to Control Our Lives from Womb to the Tomb, They Will also ReachUp from the Crypt.
Abu Nudnik
Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 12:00 AM
Cute. Funny. But I disagree with you regarding undergraduate work. The problem is a lack of healthy diversity of opinion in these courses. When the liberal professors let the communists in, they shut the door on conservatives.
MichaelSSEC
Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 12:33 AM
Burt, having read one of your books (and having read a patch of the tripe passed off as writing by the likes of Tom Friedman) I am sitting here in slack-jawed disbelief that you have not won a Pulitzer. If I had a vote, you'd have it. For gems like this one:"But even in their wildest dreams, the GOP never imagined that within two short years, they would pick up Ted Kennedy's Senate seat and elect a slew of governors and senators in Ohio, Virginia, New Jersey and Florida. When Bob Turner, a Catholic conservative, won the recent election in New York's predominantly Jewish 9th district, millions of champagne glasses were hoisted all over America toasting their favorite mole, Barack Obama."Genius!
Burt Prelutsky
Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 12:45 AM
MichaelSSec: If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times...the wrong people are in charge of the Pulitzer Prize.Regards, Burt
W.T. Door
Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 3:54 AM
Burt and all ye good folk out there. Can’t believe you missed that old line, “Johnson declared war on poverty, and poverty won”.
Tom
Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 11:43 AM
Burt, Quit tipping off the libs. It was apparent that McCain wanted no part of being elected. I only hope we didn't underestimate the damage one Obummer could do in four years. He is doing his best to put this country in irretrivable recovery. How can any reasonable person think he is good for this country?
Sprinklerman
Tuesday, October 4, 2011 at 12:05 PM
First for those who think that we should be compromising simply because of gridlock, I have only this to provide as proof that compromise isn't all that it's cracked up to be. "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles." Ayn RandAs to drug use and legalization, I cannot agree, particularly with narcotics. These drugs form dependencies that are so strong that a person's life will be forever changed for the worse upon their first attempt at use. The result will be more single mothers and fathers with children raised up in a single parent household that will then be dependent upon the government.Legalizing these drugs will simply make these drugs more prevalent and easier to obtain. This will result in more people using these drugs, becoming dependent upon it and the government for support. Unintended consequences will result in more government progams to help those who have drug dependencies. Even one person on this thread is already suggesting that insurance companies provide coverage for addiction therapy.