The Right Opinion
Defining 'Anosognosia'
Although, as a rule, I prefer avoiding using words in my articles that will send most normal people scurrying for their dictionary, I only recently came across "anosognosia" and I felt I should share it because it so perfectly describes the mental condition of liberals. It is the total unawareness of one's own disease, disability or defect. So when we find ourselves asking why leftists think and act as they do, apparently living in a fantasy world totally disconnected from reality, at least we now know there's a word that defines it.
I mean, what other reason would any American have for supporting the United Nations? By this time, rational people would understand that the U.N. is merely a larger, more corrupt, version of the League of Nations. Between 1919 and its dissolution in 1946, for all its self-laudatory hyperbole, the League stood idly by while Japan invaded Manchuria, Italy slaughtered Ethiopians and Hitler marched into Czechoslovakia and Poland.
That should have been the end of it, but, instead, like one of those creatures from "Night of the Living Dead," it rose from the grave and morphed into the U.N. And ever since, we Americans have provided the vile thing with shelter, 25% of its upkeep and 100% of any necessary renovations. And for what? So that the handful of decent nations that still exist in the world can consistently be out-voted by the Arab and Muslim members; and when more votes are required, there's always Russia, China, Cuba, Laos, Cambodia, Uganda and the Congo, ready to pitch in.
This is an organization that votes resolutions every other day condemning Israel, but nary a one against the Palestinians or the folks murdering Christians in the Middle East or the vile nations that at this late date are still dealing in the African slave trade.
Although those on the Left love to deal in moral equivalency when it was, say, a comparison between the U.S. and the Soviet Union or the Arab assassins of Munich and the Israelis who tracked them down, you never hear them comparing the member states of the U.N. to Murder Incorporated or the Barbary pirates, which would make a great deal more sense.
Donald Trump has kindly offered to purchase the U.N. Building, even though he would have to tear down the eyesore and then spend a bloody fortune to detoxify the land after all these years of contamination. If I were in charge, I would say, "Donald, you've got yourself a deal. Is ten dollars too much to ask?"
Not that far from the U.N., we have Wall Street, where thousands of young zombies have been congregating for some time, apparently in the belief that a rock concert is about to begin. I can only imagine that they were heading for Woodstock and got turned around when they found themselves stuck in Manhattan traffic.
Even though these demonstrations have caught on like a virus and are taking place all around the country, I'm actually getting a kick out of them. That's because I am imagining the parents -- well-intentioned idiots who forked over thousands of dollars to send these young saps off to academia, where leftwing Dr. Frankensteins, posing as professors, could replace their brains with those of parrots -- sitting home and watching the inevitable play out on their TVs.
Again, if I were in charge, I would round up these young idiots, together with Obama and all of his enablers in Congress, the public sector unions and the media, and send them off with one-way tickets to live in Greece. There they could experience firsthand the glories of socialism that they've espoused for decades.
Speaking of Chairman Obama, I can't help noticing that every time he gives a political speech, which is every day that ends with a "y," he insists that he wants to spend more tax dollars in order to save the jobs of cops, teachers and firemen. I'm sure it makes for nice reading in union newsletters, but the fact is, it's always his wealthy cronies, especially those heavily invested in the green energy con game, who seem to be his major beneficiaries.
On top of that, if the federal government didn't bleed the states and municipalities like the world's biggest leech, they could deal with their own cops, teachers and firemen, as ordained in the Constitution.
Perhaps, in a fit of sanity, the states might then consider de-unionizing civil service employees. The whole idea behind a person hooking up with the government was supposed to be job security. The fact that these people now draw bigger salaries and fatter pensions than the folks in the private sector merely confirms that when the inmates run the asylum, nobody should be too surprised when it's sane people who get locked up in the padded rooms.

44 Comments
Doktor Riktor Von Zhades
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM
Burt, leave it to you to find a word such as the above in your commentary. I will endeavor to try to work this into my own commentaries on other sites. Thanks a bunch, I might start to sound like an intellectual. Well maybe I don't want that part of it. Suggestion as to what to do to the outlaw regime, it's tentacles of mobs and unions, along with the accompanying baggage of useful idiots. How about we just carve out a piece of middle america, call it the 51st State of Confusion, ship them all there, and build a wall around it. Only problem is when it rains it might fill up...maybe THAT would be a good thing no?
Doktor Riktor Von Zhades
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 1:40 PM
BTW Burt, would you be so kind as to give the phonetic spelling of said word?
Tex Horn
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 2:05 PM
Burt, you are so right about the United Nations. The liberal thinkers of America and the members of the UN are at one. Their goals are the same. And it has nothing to do with freedom. It has nothing to do with our Constitution. It has nothing to do with individual rights, only the collective world order. Perhaps George H.W. Bush said it best: "“Out of these troubled times, our objective—a new world order—can emerge. Today, that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we have known.” Is this what you want America? If you do, vote for Mitt Romney and the rest of the establishment Republicans who are but the puppets of those controlling the world's purse strings.As for the "occupiers", they have bought into the conspiracy for the overthrow of capitalism and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development. If it were not for the media, they would grow tired of living in their own filth, slink away and go home to mama.
W.T. Door
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 2:07 PM
@The good Doktor Since Burt’s away, wonder if it’s “ann-oh-sawg-nose-e-ah” ?
Frank E.
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 2:27 PM
10/22/11 "ANOSOGNOSIA"Total unawareness disease=tendencies To Exaggerate,DESTROY or SMEAR like a seasoned libral Democrat
Howard Last
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 6:55 PM
Burt - one item you forgot to include in your excellent column, the people who support the ultimate foreign entanglement (I believe George Washington had something to say about this). Some supports of the un, Bush 1 & 2, Gingrich, Perry, Haley Barbour, Cheney. What do they all have in common, they are for the New world Order. They belong to the Council on Foreign relations, or the Biderberg Group or the Tri-Laterial Commission. So lets see they owe their allegiance to a foreign entity that wants to overthrow the United States. Say isn't that the definition of treason? And to think some of these are running for President or were President or Vice President or were Speaker of the House. Could this be one of the reasons our republic is in trouble? And how come they were never tried for treason?
enemaofthestatistquo
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 8:43 PM
What did Obama say when his teleprompter was stolen? "I'm speechless".
Barry Blake
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 9:32 PM
Great article!One might also describe liberals as those suffering from a combination of Sophophobia (fear of wisdom), Theophobia (fear of religion), and Misology (fear or hatred of using reason), which causes them to use sophistry in arguments.
Burt Prelutsky
Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 10:54 PM
W.T. Door: I think you nailed it. But I would advise the Doktor to avoid using it in conversation. It's one thing to use it in an article, where the definition flows naturally,and quite another to say it out loud...compelling someone to ask for a definition. It makes the other person stop you in your tracks just when you're working up a good head of steam or, worse yet, he has to pretend he actually knows what the word means.In any case, it's good to be back. I missed you all. Okay, I missed most of you.Regards, Burt
DaneChile
Sunday, October 23, 2011 at 12:02 AM
Amen!! Government employees should not be allowed to form unions. Use the same argument tht explains why the Armed Forces cannot be unionized.
d.w.hudson
Sunday, October 23, 2011 at 7:34 AM
I believe the dems think there are diseases, defects, and disabilities. They just think that those things are our characteristics instead of their own. What's the word for a phobia of mirrors?
Fed Up
Sunday, October 23, 2011 at 10:24 AM
Hello Burt,A good word to use for liberals, Anosognosia, but it is not a formal classification in the DSM-IV-TR. So in an effort to classify, on the record, a majority of liberals as having a mental health deficiency, let’s give them more accurate diagnoses.More accurate diagnoses might be Malingering, because here they may or may not know exactly what they are doing. As well, it would seem they have sorts of Impulse Control Disorders. I would finish by saying an essential feature most seemed to have developed is a Dependent Personality Disorder. Here liberals have a pervasive and excessive need to be taken care of that leads to “clinging behaviors and fears of separation.” These people have a great difficulty in making personal everyday decisions, so they would prefer the government and others make it for them and take care of them. One might also call this laziness. I believe that sums it up. This certainly seems to speak for the OCW and liberals in general. What do you think?
Fed Up
Sunday, October 23, 2011 at 10:26 AM
Woops, meant OWS or occupy wall street.
Burt Prelutsky
Sunday, October 23, 2011 at 1:33 PM
Fed Up: For a minute there, I thought you might be dyslexic. But it led me to notice that OCW might be the way that a person suffering from dyslexia might spell COW, and OWS might be the way he'd spell SOW. And, come to think of it, both words could apply to the farm animals camped out on Wall Street.Burt
Fed Up
Sunday, October 23, 2011 at 4:00 PM
Burt,Good one! Ha ha ha haha. Thanks for the laugh!!