The Right Opinion
Loathing Conservative Christian Candidates
Time magazine didn't mind ruffling feathers in religious America with a cover this summer that asked "Is Hell Dead?" Never mind that America is overwhelmingly Christian. Then Time found only one letter worth plucking out to feature in large, bold type from a man in Dallas: "Hell is easy to define. It would be spending eternity with evangelicals."
That sums up the secular, liberal media attitude toward America's Christian majority, and it explains why they find Republicans so objectionable when they make their religious faith part of their campaign for the presidency. Matthew Philbin and Erin Brown of the Media Research Center's Culture and Media Institute have written a new report called "Baptism By Fire" that analyzes coverage of the presidential candidates and their religious faith. Does it surprise anyone that they found a huge difference in coverage of Republicans and Democrats?
In the first ten months of 2011, network morning and evening news stories mentioned the religious faith of GOP presidential challengers more than seven times as often (143 stories to 19 stories) than they had for Democratic challengers in the first ten months of 2007. They've been 13 times more likely to be critical of the Republicans' religious beliefs than they were of Democrats just four years ago.
Did I mention Rev. Jeremiah Wright? In the first ten months of 2007, there were just six instances where stories challenged or negatively highlighted the faith of liberal White House hopefuls. The networks almost entirely avoided questions about Barack Obama's upbringing in a Muslim country and his two decades of attendance of a radical Chicago church. Likewise, audiences were reassured that Hillary Clinton's faith was important -- but only as it saw her through her husband's reckless infidelities. Primary candidates Joe Biden and Chris Dodd were never asked about their fervent voting record in favor of abortion -- even partial-birth abortion -- in full opposition to their Catholic faith.
But with Republicans, to listen to these reporters is to believe there was something frightening just below the surface of their statements of faith. NBCs Michael Isikoff exemplified this in July: "In a recent fundraising letter, presidential candidate Michele Bachmann touted her role helping to run a family counseling center. But a secret videotape, which raises questions about how the center treats patients who might be gay, is creating new controversy for Bachmann."
Four years ago, the Democrats were so pro-gay that they all agreed to a debate on the gay-oriented cable channel Logo. That wasn't a "controversy." It's only "controversial" when you oppose it.
Like Bachmann, Rick Perry has been punished for expressing his religion on the campaign trail. The networks were critical of his religious views in 63 percent of their mentions of faith. Shortly before announcing his candidacy for president, Perry held a rally in Houston called "The Response." The networks put graphics on the screen asking "Is Perry Going Too Far?" Reporters like ABCs Aaron Katersky insisted "Perry's open mix of faith and politics risks alienating even some Christian voters."
Our media's statement of faith begins with the bedrock belief that orthodox Christianity is both proof of rigid extremism and a serious threat to the First Amendment, never mind that the amendment explicitly protects the freedom to worship.
ABCs Katersky placed Perry and his supporters on the radical right. "The sponsor of Perry's rally, the American Family Association, opposes homosexuality, women's rights and religious diversity." He's suggesting the AFA opposes women's right to vote? ABC also brought on leftist "Reverend" Barry Lynn of Americans United for Separation of Church and State to warn the country about Perry. "My simple message to him is don't mess with the Constitution."
In October, reporters hovered around Rick Perry pressing him to disavow a supporter's claim that Mormons weren't Christians, which he had already done. The media hyped that Republicans would accept a Mormon in the White House. As Fox News pointed out at the time, a Quinnipiac poll found 68 percent of Republicans are comfortable with a Mormon president, as are 64 percent of independents. Democrats are the least tolerant, at 49 percent.
The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life reports more than 75 percent of Americans identify themselves as Christians, and 93 percent say they believe in God. But the CMI report says, "too often network reporters covering religious conservatives sound as though they're reporting back from an encounter with remote, primitive tribes." Network reporters need to stop sounding like "foreign correspondents" when they cover people whose faiths they don't understand. Liberal journalists pretend they're open-minded, but their news coverage suggests they feel they don't need to understand the religious right. They just need to defeat them.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

4 Comments
p3orion
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 12:31 PM
The double standard results because, as with so many other double standards in the media, religious conviction becomes a handy tool with which to bludgeon conservatives.In the liberal mindset, there is no greater crime than hypocrisy, though they are unable to recognize it in themselves. For example, they will applaud the pornographic excesses of Larry Flint, but will nevertheless excoriate any conservative found to be addicted to porn. Similarly, they love to tout Gingrich's marital indiscretions (or the unproven ones of Herman Cain) while conveniently forgetting their apologetics for similar behavior in Bill Clinton.Never mind that Herman Cain denies the rumors, or that even Newt Gingrich admits that his infidelity was wrong. Liberals cannot fathom that a person could simultaneously understand the wrongness of an action, even while engaging in it. Conservatives (and Christians in particular) understand that NONE of us is perfect or without sin. But to a liberal, for whom there is no such thing as sin, there can be no judgement for failing to live up to standards, because there ARE no objective standards. The question is not so much why Bill Clinton was a devious lech, but why wouldn't he be?
Richard Ryan
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 2:19 PM
Hell is not dead. Those of us who love freedom,our country, and the Constitution have been living in Hell ever since the Kenyan-born,communist cockroach from Chicago was elected.Richard RyanLamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman
Ed Watts
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 6:59 PM
"Democrats are the least tolerant..."Surprised? I'm not. It seems the only things Democrats tolerate are those which tend to destroy individuals, families, and our once-great nation. I am not THAT old, but I can recall when honorable people were often described as "God-fearing" "church-going" or "Christian". Since the public schools and universities have become centers for liberal indoctrination, those terms have become pejorative. Many people now fear/loathe professing Christians more than they fear/loathe convicted felons.America, where hast thou gone?
Don Lee
Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 10:42 AM
In the midst of a gigantic bombardment, we duck into a place of protection. This bombardment is not really between conservative, liberal ; Democrat, Republican ; Christan ,Atheist, etc. The real battle here is between God and Satan. Satan knows time is growing shorter. I know who will win. I am on that side.