The Right Opinion
Why Thomas Friedman Abetted Anti-Semitism
After a lifetime of studying the left, I have concluded that leftism is a form of moral poison. It causes otherwise decent and kind people who take it into their systems to say and/or do cruel and sometimes evil things.
While not specifically about the left, a major new scholarly book, "Pathological Altruism" (Oxford University Press), explores this phenomenon of people wanting to do good things yet ending up doing bad. It applies to The New York Times foreign affairs columnist Thomas L. Friedman, who has a deep altruistic urge to bring peace to the Middle East. But because he sees the world through the liberal/left prism, he says morally reprehensible things -- statements that individuals associated with hate-filled, non-altruistic groups and ideologies would make.
In his Dec. 13 column, yet another of his attacks on Israel and its supporters, Friedman wrote: "The standing ovation (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu) got in Congress this year was ... bought and paid for by the Israel lobby."
If a non-Jew had written this, he would have been severely condemned for writing something outright anti-Semitic. The notion that Jews manipulate the levers of power in Western societies for their own nefarious ends is probably the most enduring of all the West's Jew-hating myths. It was a staple of Nazi anti-Semitism and is the single most repeated charge of those in the Arab and larger Muslim worlds who seek to annihilate Israel, since its purpose is to convince people that non-Jews who support Israel have been paid off by Jews.
But Friedman, who is a Jew and a liberal, can get away with it -- even though it is so morally repulsive that Jew-haters can now assert they are merely quoting a well-known Jew. Who's going to call him on it? The New York Times?
To his credit, one congressman did condemn Friedman. Rep. Steven R. Rothman (D-N.J.) released this statement: "Thomas Friedman's defamation against the vast majority of Americans who support the Jewish State of Israel, in his New York Times opinion piece today, is scurrilous, destructive and harmful to Israel and her advocates in the U.S. Mr. Friedman is not only wrong, but he's aiding and abetting a dangerous narrative about the U.S.-Israel relationship and its American supporters.
"I gave Prime Minister Netanyahu a standing ovation, not because of any nefarious lobby, but because it is in America's vital national security interests to support the Jewish State of Israel, and it is right for Congress to give a warm welcome to the leader of such a dear and essential ally. Mr. Friedman owes us all an apology."
Friedman's charge, as Rothman points out, is not only "scurrilous, destructive and harmful" to Israel, but it is also a lie. The Congress of the United States -- including Republicans who have virtually no Jews in their district or state -- supports Israel for the same reasons Harry Truman recognized Israel against the advice of the U.S. State Department, Richard Nixon saved Israel during the 1973 War despite his anger at Jewish liberals, and Dick Cheney vigorously supported Israel despite Wyoming's having almost no Jewish population. They all believed that Israel shares America's moral values, while Israel's enemies (who happen to hate America as well as Israel) do not.
So how does Mr. Friedman, whom I assume is an honorable man and well-intentioned seeker of peace in the Middle East, write something that is equally mendacious and hateful, that abets anti-Semitism and that labels every pro-Israel congressman and senator a political whore?
Because he is a man of the left.
When good people adopt the leftist worldview, they eventually support ideas and say things that are cruel. Thomas Friedman did not write this anti-Semitic libel because he is an anti-Semite. Of course he is not an anti-Semite. He wrote it because he is a leftist.
Leftism poisons everything it influences -- from journalism to the arts to universities to religion to government to male-female relations. And ultimately leftism poisons character. This does not mean that everyone with left-wing views becomes a bad person, and it doesn't mean that everyone with conservative views is a good person. Both judgments are untrue and foolish.
But it does mean that leftism leads to pathologic altruism, i.e., bad things done by people with pure intentions. Just as Mahatma Gandhi's hatred of violence led him to tell the Jews of Europe not to resist Hitler, so too has leftism led decent people who would weep at Israel's destruction to mouth the very same lies about Israel as those who seek its annihilation.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

7 Comments
Richard Ryan
Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 11:35 AM
Mr.Friedman may have a high muckety muck education but that dosen`t stop him from being just plain stupid.To the best of my knowledge I am not personally acquainted with any Jewish person, but that does not stop me from whole-heartedly supporting the people of Israel. However unlikely it is to make a difference with people like Friedman, he needs to get out in the real world for a little while.Richard RyanLamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman
Ted R. Weiland
Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 12:37 PM
Consider that the Jews themselves admit that they are not genetic descendants of Jacob/Israel in their Encyclopedias and Almanacs (The Jewish Encyclopedia, the Encyclopedia Judaica, The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, and the 1980 Jewish Almanac). For example, the first chapter of the latter is entitled "Identity Crisis." The very first sentence reads, "Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew.'" You can read it from the "Jewish Almanac" for yourself at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/id-crisis-pics.php. What's this say for the entire Zionist movement?
Geoff
Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 12:43 PM
Freidman is a moron, OK, a leftist, same thing. i saw the standing ovation given to the Prime Minister and I thought it was given largely to show that the Congress and the people of the US are behind the state of Israel and to reproach the reprobate in chief for the way he treated Mr. Netanyahu.
Rampartwatcher67
Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 3:39 PM
Might we consider that such "moral poison" has an ultimate source? With its pride in knowing better than God Himself, Leftism may suffer psychologically from "pathological altruism," but spiritually-speaking such Original Sin would seem to indicate an alignment with evil itself. Inasmuch as there exists a malevolent entity known as "The Accuser of The Brethren" who operates as the "Spirit of confusion" then --in having an ethos of covetousness and an ends-justify-means power mode that (almost) invaribly devolves into moral obfuscation and egregious slander--Leftism as a system is Satanic. Remember that even the apostle Peter was labled a Satan for his naively presenting an easy street temptation to The Christ in opposition of La Via Dolorosa. Similarly, if one believes that one can unwittingly be an agent of the devil, could it be that all too many well-meaning liberals (particularly those ignorantly taking orders from Luciferian Alinskyites) are indeed paving a road to Hell itself? Of Friedman, et al., we might say along with a certain 1st Century rabbi: "Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of."
Andrea
Wednesday, December 21, 2011 at 2:49 AM
To Ted R Weiland - Humanity descended from apes. Choose your own ape with care.
TJS
Wednesday, December 21, 2011 at 11:46 AM
Leftists are knee-jerk reactionary against positions of the right. They view the constitution with scorn and condescencion, they love massive government and borrowing, they love bureaucrats running our lives and economy, they laugh at budgets, they dislike our allies, they love and respect our enemies. They punish success and reward failure.
Abu Nudnik
Wednesday, December 21, 2011 at 12:15 PM
I think he has a form of Stokholm Syndrome. "No Kill I," as the silicone-based life-form scrawled in the sand in one Star Trek episode.@Ted R. Welland: The Jews are most certainly the descendents of the ancient Israelites and Judahites. Your statement, "Consider that the Jews themselves admit that they are not genetic descendants of Jacob/Israel" is playing with words. The source you quote says only that it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite or Judahite a Jew because there is no agreement about when normative Judaism came into existence.Orthodoxy states at Creation with the Oral Torah. Others say when the first covenant was made with Abraham. Some say it came into being when Israel and Judah split since Ancient Israel only shared the first seven books of the Hebrew Bible. Some say during the Babylonian Captivity, when the Hebrew Bible was sealed or at the writing of the Mishna, depending on the school of thought. None of this has to do with genetic descent. In any case, the opinion of two Jews is pretty much the definition of a Jew going for a walk. To take this one opinion and say that it is the sole truth as you yourself twist its meaning is to state that all Jewry shares a common mind. That's nonsense. Chomsky vs. the author of this article, for example, disprove that.