In response to
Obama v. SCOTUS
RudyT
Friday, April 6, 2012 at 2:19 PM
RudyT
Friday, April 6, 2012 at 2:19 PM
The Patriot Post's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
Obamacare has 4 SCOTUS votes locked down....not because of its constitutionality, but because they agree with the law.It apparently doesn't matter if the law is extraordinarly bad AND unconstitutional...as long as you agree with the legislation.How can Justice Kagan really believe that she can issue a fair ruling on legislation she was recently tasked with defending (as solicitor general)? In my mind there is no clearer cause for recusal than this situation.No matter. The traitor in chief is more concerned about how unprecidented it would be if the high court said "no" to just one of his many power grabs.The liberals who cheer when Obama overreaches his authority should be wary of what COULD happen when his successor takes the reins in January 2013.Has America had enough of Putin-esque pseudo-dictators, or will they re-elect the enemy?