The Right Opinion
Improving Life for Workers
It seems intuitive that a free market would lead to a "race to the bottom." In a global marketplace, profit-chasing employers will cut costs by paying workers less and less, and shipping jobs to China.
It's a reason that progressives say government must step in.
So America now has thousands of rules that outlaw wages below $7.25 an hour, restrict unpaid internships and compel people to pay union dues. These rules appear to help workers. But they don't.
"Collective bargaining" sounds good. Collective bargaining "rights" even better. Employers are more sophisticated about job negotiations than individual employees, so why shouldn't workers be able to join together to bargain?
They should be. But in 27 states, labor laws force workers to join unions. When CBS offered me a job, I had to join AFTRA, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. I didn't want to. I don't consider myself an artist. I didn't want to pay dues to a union that didn't appear to do much. But I had no choice.
Laws that force workers to join unions treat millions of diverse people, most of whom want very different things, as undifferentiated collectives. That means that good workers get punished.
When I was at ABC and CBS, union culture slowed us down. Sometimes a camera crew took five minutes just to get out of the car.
But without a minimum wage or union protection, wouldn't employers abuse workers? In a real free market, no, they can't. Because workers have choices. Employers have an incentive to maintain a good relationship with employees -- one that keeps them reasonably loyal -- because workers can quit and go work for a rival.
If globalism leads to a "race to the bottom," why do 95 percent of American workers make more than minimum wage? It's not because companies are generous, but because competition forces them to offer higher wages to attract good workers. Companies may move jobs overseas to escape high U.S. wages (or U.S. taxes and regulations), but they clearly prefer to keep jobs here, close to their headquarters, suppliers and customers.
Unions once helped advance working conditions, but now union rules hurt workers because they stifle growth by making companies less flexible. When I arrived at CBS, I was stunned to discover that I couldn't even watch a video in a tape player without risking a grievance being filed by a union editor, saying I'd encroached on his job. Work ground to a halt while we waited for a union specialist to press the "on" button. ABC and CBS, being private businesses that had to compete, eventually got rid of those rules. But it took years.
Unions eventually hurt union workers because unionized companies atrophy. Non-union Toyota grew, while GM shrank. JetBlue Airlines blossomed, while unionized TWA and Pan Am went out of business. Unions "protect" workers all the way to the unemployment line.
When I criticize compulsory unions and regulations, it's not because I want rich employers to get fat off the labor of workers. It's because I've learned that markets are fluid -- and the best way for more workers to find good jobs is to leave everyone free to make any contract they wish.
Outlawing the low-wage job that taught a teenager skills or the internship that gave a kid a foot in the door doesn't insulate people from hardships of the market. It insulates them from knowledge about how to function in an ever-changing economy.
That's not compassion. That's a denial of reality.
Advocates of "kind" central planning overlook the gradual, piecemeal improvement that markets make. Focused on government's promise of once-and-for-all solutions (promises that rarely lead to actual solutions), people miss how free markets gradually help humanity solve problems.
Economic historian Robert Higgs joked that it will always be easier to rally politically inclined people behind unrealistic, revolutionary causes than to rally them around subtle economic progress, because no crowd marches behind a banner proclaiming, "Toward a Marginally Improved Society!"
The best way to help workers is to get the government to butt out and let competitive markets work.
COPYRIGHT 2012 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

4 Comments
billy396 in columbus, ohio
Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 12:30 PM
I'm a union worker in a state where we are forced to join a union if we want to work ni a unionized company. My union (one of the 2 largest private sector unions in the country), regularly takes our union dues and gives millions of dollars to Democrats running for office. We've been working without a union contract for several months now, and there's no end in sight. Of course, if the union had taken our union dues and set up an account for the workers, we could go on strike and each of us could have some monetary relief while the strike lasted. Our union buys into every lie that the Demoncrats try to sell, and they routinely pass out fliers urging us to back Democrap ideas, such as no voter ID laws. There is absolutely NO rational, reasonable idea for not requiring people to produce ID in order to vote, other than to enable voter fraud. Nevertheless, my union urged all of us to contact our representatives and try to get them to vote against voter-ID laws. Of course, their excuse was that requiring voter-ID would disenfranchise some unknown group of people who have no ID. Everyone has ID these days. You can't even cross the street without ID, unless you want to go to jail if the police accuse you of jaywalking. The police will NOT release anyone until they can establish exactly who that person is. If these unknown people have no ID, how do they get their unemployment checks and food stamps? The only reason to vote against voter-ID laws is to enable voter fraud. Even Iraq requied purple ink on one's finger after voting. When third-world countries are ahead of the U.S. in preventing voter fraud, then we know that we're in dire trouble. The Demoncrats are so transparent in these ideas that it's embarrassing. It's akin to their oft-repeated mantra that the Republicans want to destroy the middle class. If the GOP supposedly represents big business, then who's going to buy the products and services of those businesses if they destroy the middle class? These leftist Socialist demons want Democrap ideas running this country, and obviously have no respect for our Constitution.
Joe in Texas
Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 3:06 PM
Just curious...do you speak up at rallies, meetings, or to your fellow union members? What's the outcome? Are you blackballed, or shunned?
I live in a right to work state, and with my big mouth, there's no way I'd be able to stay silent if I were forced to unionize. I would constantly be in trouble.
TJS in near Sanford, FL
Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 8:57 PM
Unions are the biggest job killers in America. They have destroyed airlines, railroads, auto companies, ship builders, maritime shipping, and more. Right now they are killing California government, K-12 education, and government in general. They are self-extinguishing.
Brian in Newport News, VA
Thursday, May 31, 2012 at 2:03 PM
Mac, The way to expose the democrats for what they are is education. The current Democratic party is the new American Communist party. Think of some of the positions that the Democratic party supports. Then look at the goals of the communist party posted in the Congressional Record back in 1963. http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm Look at goal 15 and on down. May of these goals are either fully accomplished or significant progress has been made. If we do not soon reverese this trend and retake some ground lost, then America is lost!