Showing 4 comments for
Profits and Loss

When a Bain company goes under it is villified, but when Obamao and the Democrats failures in green energy mount to levels that would make Bains success seem gargantuan, they claim they are saving and creating jobs. The lies are endless from these marxist traitors. If liberals didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any.

The Liberals will never grasp economic realities because that would mean that they were wrong all this time.Bain Capital and other venture capitalists take a risk with their own money and win or lose they have to live with the consequences.Obama,on the other hand,gambled with our money and lost.Until Republicans man up and impeach this clown then nothing will change.But,the Republicans in WaD.C. are slopping from the same trough so there is little incentive for them to grow a set and take action.

I disagree. Obama doesn't understand capitalism and it's benefits. He is thoroughly indoctrinated into Marxist thought. In reality, his understanding of economics belongs among the tribes and chiefdoms of the Pacific islands, where Big Men do all the organizing and redistribution.

He

There was a time in America, not so long ago, when millionaires were respected, nay, revered by the general public. Everyone "knew" that he, by good ideas, hard work, and, yes, dint of good fortune could achieve "millionaire" status. Countless millions failed to become millionaires, but that didn't stop them or anyone else from trying.

When I was a young man, most, if not all, of us thought that we would, one day, be millionaires. As I have lived my life, that paradigm has changed; most young folks no longer desire to "win life's lottery" by working hard. The communists who have "educated" them since they were mere toddlers, through their public school and university experiences, have inculcated them with the ideas that, no matter what happens, they will never be "rich". That those "rich people" have achieved their success on the backs of "working people" whom"the rich" have exploited. That mere possession of more than someone else is prima facie evidence that the ones who are better-off are, fundamentally, evil.

We have allowed this to occur on our watch because we failed to insist upon the Constitutionality of legislation, thinking that we would be rewarded for our compassion and caring. Well, it hasn't worked out so well, has it? Compassion is nice when practiced on an individual level; when governments practice compassion, it becomes a support-buying sham.

What do we do now?