The Right Opinion
Big Lesson for Labor in Wisconsin Election
Gov. Scott Walker's victory in the Wisconsin recall election this week was no surprise to anyone but Big Labor. Unions were furious when Walker and the Republican-controlled legislature cut back their right to bargain on anything beyond wages. Democratic legislators fled the state for several weeks in 2011 in order to try to prevent a final vote from taking place. Demonstrators took over the state capitol, and when that didn't work, unions and left-leaning groups gathered signatures to force a recall vote.
The national Democratic Party initially saw what was happening in Wisconsin as a popular revolt against Republican excesses and a key to preventing Republicans from building on their success in the 2010 congressional and gubernatorial elections. But as time for the recall neared, even party hacks were nervous. Still, organized labor pressed on, sure that they could count on Democrats, young people, minorities, and -- especially -- union households to turn out in greater numbers and vote to kick out Walker.
But exit polls from Tuesday's election show that unions were wrong in most of their predictions. Their candidate, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Burnett, won the votes of most Democrats (91 percent), young people (51 percent), and blacks (94 percent), but those voters were not as enthusiastic as Walker's base of Republicans, those over 30, and suburbanites and small-town voters. Turnout was historic for a governor's race in the state -- almost 60 percent -- but those committed to keeping Walker still exceeded those who wanted to give him the boot. Walker actually won a larger percentage of the vote in the recall election than he had initially in 2010.
Most devastating to the unions' ambitions, however, was that union households deserted labor's choice in droves. Nearly 4 in 10 union households voted to keep Walker in the governor's mansion, despite unprecedented pressure by union operatives who tried to get union members and their families to view Walker's efforts as a war on unions.
Big Labor failed because even some union members recognize that public employees' benefits are way out of line in their state. Until Walker's reform passed, many public employees in Wisconsin contributed little or nothing to their pension and health plans. Walker instituted reforms that included mandatory employee contributions to pension plans -- 5.8 percent in 2011 -- as well as forcing some public employees to share a larger, but hardly excessive, share of their health care premiums. But these demands seemed reasonable to most working men and women, who are used to making such contributions already, even union members.
The real problem for the unions, however, was that Walker's reforms deprived public employee unions from having union dues deducted automatically from covered employees' salaries. Under the old rules, teachers and other public employees who were covered by a union contract had dues taken directly out of their paychecks by their employers and handed over to the unions, without their having given affirmative consent. After the new law passed, public employees had to sign up to have their dues collected -- and many decided not to.
Public employee union membership in Wisconsin plummeted as a result. According to the Wall Street Journal, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees lost more than half its members statewide, from 62,818 members in March 2011 to only 28,745 in February 2012. Teachers unions were hard hit as well, with the American Federation of Teachers losing 6,000 of its 17,000 members in the last 15 months.
It's no wonder given these numbers that so many union households ended up deserting their union leaders on Election Day. The real lesson is that Big Labor can no longer count on marshaling its members to turn out and vote as union leaders direct. The labor movement has gotten fat and lazy on mandatory membership, employers' collecting union dues, and promising more than can be reasonably delivered, like fat pensions for life.
And public employee unions, which have been the only segment of organized labor that has grown in decades as private union membership dwindled to only 6.9 percent of the workforce, are now going to have to face the music as well. Unions can't count on their members, especially when those 'members' can choose not to belong.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

5 Comments
mark in massachusetts
Friday, June 8, 2012 at 7:47 AM
I,along with a growing number of public employees,understand the current economic reality.However,I find it strange that so much anger is directed at us.We are just trying to get by like everyone else.I am grateful for the career I have and I truly care for my neighbors and my 'customers'.By customer,I mean the general public.I am a firefighter and treat everyone as I would a customer if I was self-employed; as I was for a number of years.Not all union members are drones who follow the party line.
David S. in Baton Rouge, LA
Friday, June 8, 2012 at 9:07 AM
To Mark:
I agree with your statement. Having worked for both the state and federal governments, I know very well that there are many government workers that take pride in their work and try to do their best (I would like to think I was one of them). And, I must honestly say, it is only human nature to want more money and more compensation for one's work, especially if one feels they are underpaid.
Still, with that being said, one must also have a realistic view of compensation, and it sounds like more and more workers are finally waking up to the fact that the modern unions are not only not serving the interests of their members, but are actually working against their best interests. Most (not all) modern unions are bloated, corrupt political machines that keep their members in poverty at the expense of their big boss's wallets. And there was nothing the public employees in Wisconsin could do about that.
Until very recently... (cue ominous drum roll)
XCpt in Idaho
Friday, June 8, 2012 at 3:47 PM
The issue with a Public Sector Union has never been about ensuring public employees receive a fair wage for the position they hold. The issue has been that the wage and benefits they receive is not negotiated with the people that pay that wage, which is the general public.
A private sector company with Union employees enters into negotiations to determine what pay and benefits can be accommodated and still keep the business profitable. That agreement is between the employer and the Union.
A public sector union negotiates pay and benefits with the government administration that is in charge at the time, an entity that also draws its pay from taxes on the public, so there is no negotiation with the employer (the public) that has to pay for those wages and benefits. A public sector union should have to petition the public for the pay and benefits that the employees will receive by means of State Tax Propositions so the general public can determine what is appropriate for public service employees versus whichever political party happens to be in power.
Terry Webb in PEARLAND
Saturday, June 9, 2012 at 12:03 PM
You become a public employee at the age of 23 (for example: public school teacher). You teach for 32 years and retire at the ripe old age of 55 receiving full benefits (retirement pay and healthcare). For the next 30 years (based on longevity statistics) you enjoy those benefits (with increases tied to the inflation rate) that are largely paid for by current workers paying a small amount into the system. But, you say, "I sacrificed a potentially larger salary in the private sector; do, deserve the added benefits." Baloney! Public teacher salaries are competitive with the private sector and the public worker enjoys MUCH greater job security (no matter how incompetent they may be), and most private sector workers can only dream about the retirement benefits.
mark in massachusetts
Saturday, June 9, 2012 at 1:00 PM
You sound like one of those who tried to become a cop or firefighter and didn't make the cut.I chose to become a firefighter because of the job,not the benefits.In 1986,for example,I had my own business and took home 2 grand a week.I would have have tossed it aside in a heartbeat to take a $12,800 a year position as a firefighter in a neighboring state.Not all public employees are in it for the dough! Ididn't become a jake until age 35 thanks to affirmative action screwing me out of 7 years of my career.I will have to work until 63 (unlikely in this profession) to get to the maximum pension available to me.By the way,I had a broken back in 2009 and have been back on the job since summer of 2010.I also had to fight for my rights since the city said my injury was "pre-existing".That's why public unions still are needed.A broken back as a 'pre-existing' injury? Now that's baloney! I'm still voting for Romney and will vote (R) in the future.