The Right Opinion
Obama's 'Fine' Mess
The 1990 Italian film "Everybody's Fine" is one of the most depressing films I've ever seen. Starring the late Marcello Mastroianni, it's the story of an old man who tells his wife he's going to visit their grown kids. According to their letters the kids are doing great, but he'd like to see for himself.
It turns out that the kids are all doing badly, and the whole trip is drenched in nostalgia and regret for what might have been. When the father gets home, he can't bring himself to tell his wife the truth, even though -- the audience discovers -- she's been dead and buried for years. In the last scene, we see the old man at his wife's grave, reassuring her, "Everybody's fine."
Listening to President Obama's defenders spinning his claim that the "private sector is doing fine" reminded me of those kids and their dad, all afraid to admit everything's not fine.
One common defense: He was just being ironic or sarcastic.
New York magazine's Jonathan Chait insists that Obama meant it "in the same basic way that I did this week when I was slowly recovering from a horrendous head cold and told people I was 'fine' ...." On Monday, MSNBC host Chris Hayes said on the "Today" show that Obama meant it the way somebody says "I'm fine" when they really mean "You don't have to rush me to the emergency room" after a bloody head injury.
The only problem: There's pretty much no evidence that's how Obama meant it.
In his news conference last week, Obama argued that the private sector isn't holding back the economy, the public sector is -- hence "the private sector is doing fine." When given the opportunity to retract his gaffe, he basically repeated it. "It's absolutely clear that the economy is not doing fine," the piqued president said. "That's the reason I had the press conference." (Something's wrong when you have to explain why you had a press conference.)
Why is the economy "not doing fine"? Because, he explained, the public sector isn't keeping up with the private sector: "Now, I think if you look at what I said this morning and what I've been saying consistently over the last year, we've actually seen some good momentum in the private sector."
And when CNN's Candy Crowley asked Obama senior advisor David Axelrod three times on Sunday for a yes or no answer to the question "Is the private sector doing fine?," he refused to offer anything like a retraction. "It's certainly doing better than the public sector," he said on his third try. Simply: There's been no retraction.
Two things are going on here, one substantive, one political.
Substantively, Obama believes that we can save the economy -- or at least his re-election efforts -- if we open the sluices of more federal spending (with money borrowed from China) and devote it to hiring a lot more government workers. Basically, it's stimulus 2.0 (3.0, really, since Bush had a stimulus too). Obama, as he correctly insisted, has been saying this "consistently." As The Weekly Standard's Jay Cost notes, that the president needs another round of payoffs to his own base is a sign of Obama's weakness.
Politically, however, this is a very hard sell. As we've seen in Wisconsin and California, lavishing more borrowed money on public sector workers is less popular than asking them for some shared sacrifice, particularly among independent voters.
More important, the private sector isn't doing fine. The only reason the unemployment rate is as low as it is, is that millions of Americans have lost hope that it's worth looking for a job. You can't have the weakest recovery in generations and the highest sustained unemployment rate since the Depression and say the private sector is doing fine.
Actually, you can say it; it's just that no one will believe you.
And that's Obama's real dilemma. He can't concede the private sector is doing badly because (1) he wants to burden it even more to spend more on the public sector, and (2) if he admits the private sector is still doing badly, he's conceding the heart of Mitt Romney's charge that Obama has failed economically.
So he's stuck claiming he's done everything right, and the only problem is the GOP's refusal to lavish more money on state governments. And nobody in his family of advisors and supporters has it in them to tell him otherwise. It's like he's talking to a tombstone marked "Obama Campaign 2012."
(C) 2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc.

6 Comments
William Scott in Indiana
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 10:40 AM
A psychologist once told me that FINE is an acronym: Frustrated Insecure Neurotic Emotionally unstable I'd say that does describe the private sector after a few years of this appalling administration.
wjm in Colorado
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 10:57 AM
I believe in depressing the economy and destroying American ideals in favor of treasonous marxist ideology, Obamao has delivered on his promise to transform, and to him it IS just FINE. This is his ideal America.
jksisco in irvine, ca
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 12:42 PM
The layoffs and diminished services at the State and Local level is a case of the chickens coming home to roost, lavish pension programs take more and more of shrinking budgets, creating a drag on the economy and forcing higher taxes and fees which comes from the private sector. Would more money solve this predictable situation? Would it result in more hiring in the public sector or would it just be sucked by the bloated pension programs?
Rod in USA
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 1:47 PM
Well done, Sir
searchlight in Richardson, Texas
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 5:23 PM
Everyone is missing the point, even Mr. Goldberg. The Public Sector is actually doing MUCH BETTER than the Private Sector. Government employees have a much lower unemployment percentage (about half) and a much higher level of income. Maybe the President misspoke.....
Terry Webb in PEARLAND
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 9:52 PM
The truth? Obama doesn't care if the private OR public sectors are doing well. As long as he is re-elected, both sectors can go to Hell with eveyrone else in the country; as long as he presides in Hell.