The Right Opinion
Democrats' New Motto: Never Let a Wildfire Go to Waste
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- Did you know that President Obama has been incommunicado with Colorado's governor for more than two weeks as the nation's worst wildfires rage across the state? Maybe he thought we were all "doing fine." After an embarrassing Beltway press briefing revelation about our out-of-touch White House, the administration finally decided to divert the campaigner in chief from his nationwide fundraising frenzy for a quick look-see at our devastated city on Friday. It's "leadership from behind" you can count on.
On Wednesday, press secretary Jay Carney acknowledged that Obama hadn't talked to Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper in 15 days. Holy smokes. The High Park fire, which has consumed nearly 90,000 acres and claimed nearly 257 homes west of Fort Collins, ignited on June 9 and is still active. During a campaign swing just last week, first lady Michelle Obama made a brief mention of the High Park fire before launching into her standard GOP-bashing stump speeches.
On June 23, the Waldo Canyon fire in Colorado Springs erupted. An estimated 19,000 acres and nearly 350 homes burned down to the ground on Tuesday. More than 32,000 have been displaced so far. My family was forced to abandon our home on Saturday, and our neighborhood remains in a mandatory evacuation zone. On June 27, Boulder's Flagstaff fire broke out and has so far blazed through 300 acres.
While he made no public statements prior to the announcement of his visit, an irritated Carney told reporters on Wednesday that Obama was being "updated regularly" on the wildfires in Colorado and across the West. He then rushed out a face-saving press release heralding the president's hasty phone call that afternoon to Hickenlooper and Colorado Springs Mayor Steve Bach, in which he "expressed his concern about the extent of damage to homes in the Colorado Springs area, and informed both the governor and the mayor that he plans to travel to the area Friday to view the damage and thank the responders bravely battling the fire."
As Obama sightsees overhead in this key swing state and surrounds himself with first responders for campaign-ready photo-ops, his supporters on the ground are busy spewing excuses, attacks and death wishes on their political opponents. I know. I've received countless numbers of them hoping that firefighters let my "mansion" burn down and gloating that God is punishing Colorado's conservative population. Liberals took to Twitter to bash local GOP officials as "fire retardants" who should be dropped over the blaze. And jokes about Colorado social conservatives like this proliferated: "If this Colorado fire takes out the Focus on the Family campus, then God really exists."
The sniping isn't limited to social media. Obama strategist Rahm Emanuel said in 2008: "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." On cue, Hickenlooper mocked limited-government watchdogs who questioned the Obama administration's decision to cancel a key aerial tanker contract last summer. (It was the topic of my June 20 column last week, "How Obama Bureaucrats Fueled Western Wildfires.") The Denver Post reported Wednesday:
"Asked about criticism from the right over the Obama administration's canceling of the contract, Hickenlooper offered an uncharacteristically strong defense of the president. 'Were these the same conservatives that were so worried about the Obama administration spending too much money, or were these different conservatives?' Hickenlooper said. 'Quite honestly, in a situation like this where over 30,000 people have been evacuated, I don't think that (criticism of Obama) is appropriate,' the governor said. 'We should be focusing our support on them and on the people out there risking their lives to fight these fires.'"
Spare us the sanctimony, and lay off the firefighter human shield strategy. The conservatives in Congress and libertarians at MonkeyWrenchingAmerica.com and elsewhere on the right who called attention to the U.S. Forest Service's aging, neglected and undercapitalized aerial tanker fleet are the same conservatives who have doggedly called attention to the Obama administration's serial squandering of taxpayer dollars on nonessential, ineffective, crony-driven spending. We are the conservatives worried about dumping billions of dollars into bankrupt federal green boondoggles like Solyndra, Abound Solar, Beacon Power, Ener1 and LightSquared at the expense of fundamental services -- like fighting fires.
It is entirely appropriate and possible to question this administration's policy decisions while supporting frontline emergency personnel at the same time. And it is entirely logical and rational to express gratitude for firefighters and police officers -- while working to ensure the long-term financial viability of their departments through tough but necessary budget and public employee union reforms.
But don't look to Obama to put out the flames of politically expedient and inflammatory rhetoric. He may be slow on the uptake to respond to national crises, but when it comes to exploiting them, he's an industrial-grade accelerant.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

10 Comments
wjm in Colorado
Friday, June 29, 2012 at 9:59 AM
Not to mention how disruptive it is for the Mindless one to visit. They shut down the base gates, halt traffic, will they halt the flightline operations and firefighting to allow a photo OP? How many homes will burn, and how much will the fire grow while this idiot parades his sorry ass around shaking hands? If any homeowner who lost a house due to this incompetent marxist traitor votes for him, they they deserve to be burned out!
Atu in Fullerton, CA
Friday, June 29, 2012 at 12:05 PM
I fail to see what the problem is here. The Bush Administration cut essential funding for the National Fire Plan which furloughed Forest Service Smokejumpers and fire service. Instead W championed the Healthy Forest Initiative which allowed for logging clearing the fire fuel from the forest. Clearly a superior solution.
I fail to see the need for government tankers, there are private tankers available, one private firm even leasing out a DC10! There are many private companies that will sell advanced fire prevention systems that will foam your house There are even private fire fighting services available that will respond to your property when wild fires threaten it.
All of these private solutions would certainly provide better and more efficient protection than any government workers.
Also anyone with any personal responsibility would have proper and complete fire insurance policies from private firms covering their property and temporary relocation assistance.
I do not see why we even bother to criticize the government response to these disasters.
We should use these opportunities as Conservatives to highlight their faults and push for complete privatization of these services.
Less government, more private sector solutions!
Danne in AZ
Friday, June 29, 2012 at 12:33 PM
The statements by Stephen Pyne are probably most accurate: “………crews have experienced changes in firefighting strategies and agencies have changed policies in fighting wildfires in isolated areas. In the last 20 years or so, agencies have generally been reluctant to put firefighters at risk in remote areas, It wasn't like that decades ago. Instead, agencies have focused attention on burnout operations until conditions are safe to begin containment."
Until such time politics and environmentalism is removed from the equasion and crews are allowed to take the fight to the fire in it's incipient stages, it's gonna be burn baby burn! A sky full of airtankers and angry/confused citizenry is good PR for increased budgets.
Smoke em while you got em folks...get used to it!
sfj in Alabama
Friday, June 29, 2012 at 6:51 PM
Another gubmint fu*up.
Richard Ryan in Lamar,Missouri
Friday, June 29, 2012 at 6:58 PM
Atu in Fullerton, CA: My wife and I spent the winter in California, and your remarks are exactly what I would expect from a boneheaded Californian. If I were from a state that elects the likes of Moonbeam Brown, and scarface Nancy Pelosi, I would just keep quiet.
Atu in Fullerton, CA
Friday, June 29, 2012 at 7:07 PM
I'm truly saddened and hurt by your unkind remarks.
incog99 in San Diego
Friday, June 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM
I live in San Diego and am not unfamiliar with fires. In only two fires in 2003 and 2009 San Diego lost 5,000 homes to wild fires. That's 14 times the homes lost in the Waldo fire. Yes it's tragic for those who lost their homes and more tragic for those who lost their lives. I understand one person burned to death in Mountain Shadows subdivision. 21 people burned to death in San Diego in one fire.
As far as prevention is concerned, you can hire private firefighters. In San Diego it costs about 10k a year to have this service. One of the controversies is that they will not protect those who haven't paid for the service. This happened in Rancho Santa Fe, a very wealthy enclave in San Diego. Is it fair for them to stand there with resources and not protect a home? This is an issue in San Diego and not resolved yet.
Other issues were the availability of fire fighters and especially planes (tankers). Many tankers in San Diego were grounded during the worst of the firestorms due to wind. Some said they should have let them fly. I recall watching the news where talking heads were reporting house after house burning from spot fires on the rooves. Home after home could have been saved with just a garden hose. As a matter of fact some of our Marine heroes did just that, they saved a whole street of homes in Scripps Ranch with garden hoses. Had the residents not been evacuated many more homes could have been saved with simple hoses. So why did this happen?
Many many resources had been sent to Los Angeles County for the Malibu fire. When our fire started there was no one left to fight the fire in San Diego.
Hopefully, we can all learn from our experiences. Look to California for answers because we have already experienced the mega-fires and know the issues.
I pray for the folks in Colorado that their recovery is speedy.
wjm in Colorado
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 9:56 AM
The Commercial tanker fleet is woefully inadequate. The news today claimed 47 large fires in the western states, and Californial hasn't evem begun their annual burning. At one point after a crash, the commercial fleet was down to 8 aircraft. I have been on these ageing machines, and I can hardly believe the FAA lets them fly. The military aircraft were delayed for more than a month, while close to a thousand homes burned from an inadequate commercial fleet. The military just recently developed a brand new system to replace the 30 year old one. That was done under the Bush Administration. Obamao has cut funding for the forrest sevice, until Congress a few weeks ago appropreated 24 million to assist the commercial tankers and forrest service aircraft. The cost of fighting the fires still is dwarfed by money wasted on Solyndra. Forward indeed, but to what, more burned houses?
JJStryder in Realville
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 11:37 AM
Counting on the federal Government to help is exactly the wrong solution. The founding fathers knew this and that is why a limited government was designed. Local solutions and preparedness is the only way we are going to survive until the American people wake up and reduce the size of this leviathan. The tree huggers helped fuel these fires and backward Washington priorities will guarantee increased damage to the West. We are on our own folks! Count on your family and neighbors and God, not your government.
pete in CA
Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 4:45 PM
The exact same phrase was used about Bush regarding Katrina and Ruth, and how did the liberal media interpret it?
"Bush hates black people!"
Does it mean the same thing now?