The Patriot Post's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
Showing 7 comments for
Tilting at the UN Windmill
Tex Horn in Texas
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 11:48 AM
As concerns the U.S., the UN is a very dangerous organization. Made up of terrorist nations as well as "benevolent" nations, their goal is to govern the world. And our current leadership is directing our country that way. Who are the primary supporters? Obama, Hillary Clinton and the State Department, and all "one world" supporters, which are many of our country's wealthiest citizens. At this time, the UN is trying to pass international laws that would negate the U.S. Constitution, the first target being our right to bear arms. Remember, we must be disarmed for them to succeed without a war. I encourage all to write their representatives and urge them to vote against the attempt to disarm us...that is, if your representative isn't "for" the UN's attempt to ride us of our Constitutional rights. If they are, vote them out, or we will be living in a world is which our power is equal to that of, say, Venezuela.
OKBecky in Tulsa, OK
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child has been in limbo in the U.S. Senate since 1995. It seems like it would protect children from abuses, but what it would really mean is the end of parental rights to make decisions for their children. It would mean that some government bureaucrat interposes himself (or herself) into family life, being a "spokesperson" for the "voiceless child" against abuses such as spanking, chores, religious instruction (indoctrination), and limitations on sexual freedom. It is currently under consideration in the Senate for ratification, so learn more about it and call your senators!!
http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={53D4DCA7-5899-4242-B244-54A253AFC137}
OKBecky in Tulsa, OK
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 7:10 PM
This is unrelated to the content of the article, Mr. Goldberg, but trying to read "OAHWGGAICIFMUNCSESF" to my 4-year-old son has given us both quite a good laugh. He is now rearranging about 7 letter magnets and practicing his phonics, based on how I showed him to do it with "OAHWGGAICIFMUNCSESF."
Howard Last in Wyoming
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 7:50 PM
Who are the biggest supporters of the UN, why the Council on Foreign Relations, Tri-Lateral Commission and Biderberg Group members . That would include most of the Presidents this century and all of the Secretary of States. Reagan was not a member but, George Schltz and Alexander Haig were/is. So is it any surprise that we are in the Ultimate Foreign Entanglement. Just Google CFR members and watch the list of traitors that come up.
Ct-Tom in NC
Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 7:46 AM
I suggest that we quit the UN and pay their relocation expenses. (Was it Krauthammer who suggested that Kinshasa would be a good home for it?) It would be a great "investment" for us.
Howard Last in Wyoming
Saturday, July 14, 2012 at 5:55 PM
Ct-Tom, instead of paying their relocation expenses, why not buy artillery shells to use on the House of Babble on the East River. Fumigation will cost too much.
Dane in Chile
Sunday, July 15, 2012 at 4:55 PM
Just stop funding it. I read that the U.S. provides 25% of the UN´s funding. That is taxpayer money.
Post a comment