The Right Opinion
Shut Up, Eric Fehrnstrom!
As some of you know, I tried for months to get Team Romney to put me on the writing staff. Although I saw signs of Reagan in Romney's decency and good nature, the things I didn't find were those memorable lines in his speeches that conveyed both his sense of humor and his vision for America.
But that was then and this is now. I no longer want to be merely Romney's speechwriter; I want to be what is known as a senior campaign advisor. I want him to dump this guy Eric Fehrnstrom and give me the job. It's not just that I'm uncertain whether America can survive another four years of Obama, and it's not just that I have a five dollar bet on Romney, it's this gut feeling I have that Fehrnstrom is a mole working for the other side.
The first time I even became aware that this guy existed was when he went on a TV talk show and mentioned an Etch-a-Sketch campaign. The upside is that it hiked sales for the toy, but, unfortunately, it also provided Romney's primary opponents with a prop with which they pummeled him. At the time, I told my wife that in the future, Romney should make certain that Fehrnstrom is never again allowed to appear on TV and that his future responsibilities be limited to pizza runs for the grown-ups.
Instead, I woke up one morning recently to find this chucklehead insisting that ObamaCare is a penalty, not a tax. Thanks to Chief Justice Roberts, Romney and all the other Democrats running for election this November were handed a campaign issue to end all campaign issues, and Fehrnstrom decided to spend his time trying to defend RomneyCare. Perhaps someone should remind this schmuck that Mitt Romney isn't running for governor of Massachusetts. Nobody cares what he did there. Except for those people who happen to live in Massachusetts, it's a non-issue, and, for all I know, those goofballs like RomneyCare.
It does raise the question: What is the difference between a senior campaign advisor and a rutabaga? Answer: The difference is that the rutabaga wouldn't do everything in its power to sabotage the guy who owns the farm.
Another question is why the Republicans feel this need to employ people with unpronounceable names. I mean, compared to RNC honcho Reince Priebus and senior campaign turncoat Eric Fehrnstrom, "Prelutsky" is as easy as pie.
Although I still believe that in spite of surrounding himself with a certain number of incompetents, Romney will be elected this November, the downside is that the riffraff who answer to Obama won't simply vanish from the scene. A number of his adjutants, including Jay Carney, will no doubt wind up as big shots in the media. An even larger number will end up in academia, where the likes of Valerie Jarrett, Kathleen Sebelius and Eric Holder, will follow in the footsteps of William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Angela Davis and Van Jones, poisoning the minds of the dumb and easily impressionable with left-wing claptrap.
Speaking of the Obama administration, I just learned that among the nearly 500 people taking their marching orders from Barack and Michelle is someone known as the White House calligrapher. I'm not sure what his duties are, but I imagine this person creates scrolls handed out to the various creeps, cronies and campaign contributors, that presidents inevitably refer to as distinguished friends and guests. For the fancy handiwork, this White House staffer is paid almost $100,000-a-year. Although I don't know who this person is, I'm certainly willing to bet another five dollars that he's voting for Obama. And not just once.
Because people are inclined to claim that every presidential election is the most important one in our lifetime, it's always tempting to dismiss it as mere hyperbole. But when you consider the nature of our enemies, the weapons at their disposal, and our weakened position, both economically and militarily, under Obama, I think this time it's a legitimate pronouncement.
That is why I am praying that November 6 will be the day that Obama gets his comeuppance. My joy will be unbounded, as it always is when it's someone other than myself to whom what was coming, finally gets here.
Still, even if Eric Fehrnstrom is sent packing between now and then, I know it won't be nearly as easy as it should be to defeat Barack Hussein Obama.
Frankly, it's an inscrutable mystery to me why tens of millions of Americans who have witnessed the radical transformation of America by this former-and-future community organizer are so darn eager for more of the same.
I guess this is simply one of those times when the inscrutable masses definitely should be scrute.

29 Comments
B. Ebersole in Winter Park, Fl
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 12:52 AM
When Romney finishes a profound statement he CLINCHES HIS JAW which then LOOKS LIKE A FROWN. and as a result the listener is seeing a HUGH NEGATIVE and can't come up with a big good 'ol cheer. I've watched this on several gatherings and the frown is killing his support... HE MUST WIN THIS ELECTION.
Burt Prelutsky in CA
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 2:06 AM
B Ebersole: I guess it's not as easy as it looks to run for president. If you smile, it looks like you don't take the destruction of America seriously, and if you frown, it kills the applause lines. Still, if it comes down to a guy who displays worry lines and another guy, who after blowing a trillion dollars on a stimulus program, giggled when he said, "I guess shovel-ready jobs weren't as shovel-ready as I thought," I'll take the frowner.
Burt
Howard Last in Wyoming
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 2:37 AM
Burt, your description of Eric Fehrnstrom is one of the definitions of a RINO. Could this be one reason why I am scared of the returns on Nov. 6. Fehrnstorm should be told to leave and don't let the doorknob hit you in the a##. Another scary thought what other RINO's will Romney appoint if he comes out on top in Nov?
BTW, the best definition of RINO that I like is Democrap Lite". "
G Dub in Lee's Summit, MO
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 10:12 PM
Howard - I enjoy reading your comments. Often profound - However, I really am a bit tired of the RINO talk among all of our Conservative friends. To me that type of concern was for the Primaries. We have our Repub Candidate: Romney. HE IS the one we must suck it up and back. For crying out loud, Romney is at least not a Marxist Moron as we have now!
Tad Petrie in Westerville, OH
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 8:09 AM
To Howard Last: Right there with you! I've been telling my friends who are Romney supporters since he began his campaign that he is NOT a conservative, he is a LIBERAL! The RNC is running scared and that is why they are backing Romney. They're afraid if they back a real conservative, as opposed to a fake, polyester conservative like Romney, that everyone in America will run screaming to the President and re-elect him! The only way things are going to get better is for real conservatives to start winning elections! It will not be easy though, because they will have to wage campaigns not only against their liberal opponents, but ALSO against the RNC establishment!
Cooneye in North Carolina
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 10:57 AM
Tad, it is this same RNC who shoved John McCain down our conservative throats and then thought that backing a woman (Sarah Palin) for Veep would really take them over the top in 2008 since the dems had Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton romping and stomping.
We see how that worked out and I (a nobody in political circles) tried to point that out to them to no avail.. My biggest fear is they have done it again with Romney. For some reason the Repubs always submit, roll over and let the Democrats kick away without an agressive figh tback..
I have never understood this and guess I never will.
Robert Burger in NJ
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 9:58 AM
Burt
Obama has has already beaten Jimmy Carter for the title of "worst President"
Let us hope that he also beats Walter Mondale for the title of "worst Vote-getter"
Robert in NEW Mexico
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 10:18 AM
Wow Burt, this sentence took some real grammatical gymnastics .
"My joy will be unbounded, as it always is when it's someone other than myself to whom what was coming, finally gets here".
Anyway, I imagine that you generally communicate ideas more clearly than the Romney campaign desires. That, and Ferhnstrom is probably a political crony who needs a favor, as well as a job.
Capt. Call in New Mexico
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM
Unless something happens at the convention, it appears that we are stuck with Mitt Romney. Certainly, I would have preferred a real conservative over Romney, but we have who we have, and we must make sure that he is elected. The alternative, more of Barack Obama, is national suicide.
Burt Prelutsky in CA
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 12:54 PM
Capt/ Call: You got it right. It is Romney vs. Obama. That should be a very easy decision to make for those who aren't leftists and for Republicans who aren't given to hating so-called RINOS more than they do liberals.
Howard & Tad: It seems that every four years, a certain number of Republicans insist on overlooking the primaries and pretending that there are all-powerful members of the RNC who decide who will be the presidential nominee of the GOP.
In 2012, Romney won the lion's share of the primaries, just as McCain did in 2008. I don't know how many times I have to repeat that America, by and large, is not a very conservative nation. Except for a handful of states, it is only slightly to the right of center. You should probably be reminded that McCain led in the polls as late as September, which is when the economy crashed, handing the election to Obama.
Mac: I like the Tea Party, but their influence is limited, generally by geography. You might recall that the GOP could have easily won Senate elections in Delaware and even defeated Harry Reid in Arizona, except that Tea Party candidates won the GOP primaries and then lost badly in the general elections.
Robert: I knew that sentence would trip up some people, but I appreciate that you persevered and emerged at the end of it triumphant and unscathed.
Burt
Jeri L in Boston, MA
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 2:17 PM
I just keep banging my hand against my head. We are never going to change Romney's mannerisims; how he holds his head or how he ennuciates a word. We just have to pray hard that we win this thing because we will all be headed to hell in a handbasket if we do not.
Burt Prelutsky in CA
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 2:33 PM
Mac: Good catch. Nevada, not Arizona. Sorry about that. But if a union can have that much influence on a statewide election, the problem isn't with Reid, but with the voters.
Jeri: Sorry, but I don't know what disturbs you about Romney's mannerisms or his enunciation. But whatever they are, they can't hold a candle to the affectations Obama displays when he gives a speech, cocking his head as if posing for a Roman coin and pausing three or four times before completing a single sentence.
Burt
Jeri L in Boston, MA
Friday, July 27, 2012 at 11:36 AM
Burt, I guess I did not make myself clear because I was responding to another poster who still has issues with the things Romney does. I mean that he is what he is and we should all know that by now. He is a great guy who does not come across that way. It is the likeable thing. Trust me when I say this, I have no use for Obama and I don't care how he presents himself. I never voted for him and he is worse than I ever expected him to be. Everyone needs to wrap themselves around Romney or we are doomed. I can't say that enough. We will never have a perfect candidate and I have never been so frightened or worried about his country as I am now. I am one of very few republicans in the state of MA.
BJ in St. Cloud, MN
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM
"scrute"???
TERM LIMITS-IMPEACH-PROSECUTE
DaneChile in Chile
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM
Scrute? Should be "scrutable" but it certainly sounds cool!!
Are you serious about the calligrapher? There are little old ladies who sit in their homes and do this for five bucks a page. I imagine we are talking about invitations and certificates. In this modern era, I can count about one hundred script choices on my MS Mail program. I wonder how many other positions re invented for family and friends. Does the Office of the First Lady include its own calligrapher , also?
Mike R88 in No. Hollywood, CA
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 5:03 PM
To BJ,
"Scrute." A Prelutskian corruption of Scrutinize: "to examine or observe with great care." Should be added to the dictionary as a preventative for bad judgment, esp. during election cycles.
Robert in NEW Mexico
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 5:17 PM
Burt, I am not sure I persevered or emerged triumphant.
My first, impression was “This is the sort of English up with which I will not put.”
Robert in NEW Mexico
Thursday, July 26, 2012 at 5:29 PM
By the way, the sentence was prefectly understandable, which is what makes it amazing.