The Right Opinion
Milton Friedman's Centenary
If Milton Friedman were alive today -- and there was never a time when he was more needed -- he would be one hundred years old. He was born on July 31, 1912. But Professor Friedman's death at age 94 deprived the nation of one of those rare thinkers who had both genius and common sense.
Most people would not be able to understand the complex economic analysis that won him a Nobel Prize, but people with no knowledge of economics had no trouble understanding his popular books like "Free to Choose" or the TV series of the same name.
In being able to express himself at both the highest level of his profession and also at a level that the average person could readily understand, Milton Friedman was like the economist whose theories and persona were most different from his own -- John Maynard Keynes.
Like many, if not most, people who became prominent as opponents of the left, Professor Friedman began on the left. Decades later, looking back at a statement of his own from his early years, he said: "The most striking feature of this statement is how thoroughly Keynesian it is."
No one converted Milton Friedman, either in economics or in his views on social policy. His own research, analysis and experience converted him.
As a professor, he did not attempt to convert students to his political views. I made no secret of the fact that I was a Marxist when I was a student in Professor Friedman's course, but he made no effort to change my views. He once said that anybody who was easily converted was not worth converting.
I was still a Marxist after taking Professor Friedman's class. Working as an economist in the government converted me.
What Milton Friedman is best known for as an economist was his opposition to Keynesian economics, which had largely swept the economics profession on both sides of the Atlantic, with the notable exception of the University of Chicago, where Friedman was both trained as a student and later taught.
In the heyday of Keynesian economics, many economists believed that inflationary government policies could reduce unemployment, and early empirical data seemed to support that view. The inference was that the government could make careful trade-offs between inflation and unemployment, and thus "fine tune" the economy.
Milton Friedman challenged this view with both facts and analysis. He showed that the relationship between inflation and unemployment held only in the short run, when the inflation was unexpected. But, after everyone got used to inflation, unemployment could be just as high with high inflation as it had been with low inflation.
When both unemployment and inflation rose at the same time in the 1970s -- "stagflation," as it was called -- the idea of the government "fine tuning" the economy faded away. There are still some die-hard Keynesians today who keep insisting that the government's "stimulus" spending would have worked, if only it was bigger and lasted longer.
This is one of those heads-I-win-and-tails-you-lose arguments. Even if the government spends itself into bankruptcy and the economy still does not recover, Keynesians can always say that it would have worked if only the government had spent more.
Although Milton Friedman became someone regarded as a conservative icon, he considered himself a liberal in the original sense of the word -- someone who believes in the liberty of the individual, free of government intrusions. Far from trying to conserve things as they are, he wrote a book titled "Tyranny of the Status Quo."
Milton Friedman proposed radical changes in policies and institution ranging from the public schools to the Federal Reserve. It is liberals who want to conserve and expand the welfare state.
As a student of Professor Friedman back in 1960, I was struck by two things -- his tough grading standards and the fact that he had a black secretary. This was years before affirmative action. People on the left exhibit blacks as mascots. But I never heard Milton Friedman say that he had a black secretary, though she was with him for decades. Both his grading standards and his refusal to try to be politically correct increased my respect for him.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

8 Comments
OKBecky in Tulsa, OK
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 12:19 AM
Dr. Sowell, I've been reading your columns and books for almost a decade, and I marvel at how well you're able to explain economics and social matters. What gifts you have! I don't know if it's possible to have an economist as a hero, but you're certainly one of my favorite authors and thinkers. Thank you for sharing your reflections on Milton Friedman.
Ct-Tom in NC
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 9:26 AM
I agree! We miss Friedman less because we have Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams. Long may they prosper!
India in Georgia
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM
Tom, you beat me to it...
Dr. Sowell, Milton Friedman's "genious and common sense" live on in you! Thank you for sharing both of them with us.
Robinius in Broomfield, Colorado
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 12:46 AM
Dr. Sowell, Thank you for this fine essay. With Greenspan and Bernanke prominent in the recent past I had allowed Milton Friedman to be pushed to a far corner of my mind. You were very tactful to not mention Paul Krugman as die hard Keynsian-In-Chief.
tod -the tool guy in bklyn ny
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 5:30 AM
"Societies that seek equality before liberty, will get neither, but societies that seek liberty before equality, will get a high degree of both." Milton Friedman. And "If the fed. government were in charge of the Sahara Dessert's sand, in five years, there would be a shortage of sand." Another Friedman quote. The gold standard, for growth (private sector), is the Reagan-Friedman years. Good blog, DR. SOWELL.
rab in jo, mo
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 8:58 AM
Dr. Sowell, I envy the fact that you were able to study under the supervision of the likes of Milton Friedman and you are certainly correct that there was never a time when he was more needed. Keynesian economic policy is killing our economy, just as it has in every place it is followed.
And yes, converts make the best apologists, whether in economics or religion.
India in Georgia
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 3:38 PM
"As a professor, he did not attempt to convert students to his political views. I made no secret of the fact that I was a Marxist when I was a student in Professor Friedman's course, but he made no effort to change my views. He once said that anybody who was easily converted was not worth converting.
"I was still a Marxist after taking Professor Friedman's class. Working as an economist in the government converted me."
LOL... Wow. I am astounded by these two paragraphs.
Danforth Field in Fresno CA
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM
As a lifetime conservative, I just do not understand how any logical thinker can not see through the Marxist government we have in this country with OBAMA leading the charge! If we elect him again, this country will not survive as a free Capitalist country! May GOD help us! Dan4th