The Right Opinion
Sandusky Abused Children, NCAA Abuses History
One of the NCAA's punishments of Penn State was the vacating of all its football team's wins from 1998 through 2011. It was in 1998 that Penn State coach Joe Paterno and university officials became aware of the accusation that assistant coach Jerry Sandusky had showered with a young boy.
As a result, Penn State's 112 wins are no longer wins, and Joe Paterno is no longer the coach with the most wins in college football history. Instead of 409 victories, his record shows 298.
Before explaining why this decision is morally wrong, I should note that I consider what Jerry Sandusky did to be an indescribable evil. I recognize that Joe Paterno and the university officials enabled this evil to continue. And I do not take issue with the other NCAA punishments of Penn State.
But it is worrisome that there has been virtually no outcry against the terrible wrong committed by the NCAA's rewrite of history.
Unless Joe Paterno and/or Penn State won those 112 games illegally or immorally, they are wins. No amount of wrongdoing by anyone at Penn State allows anyone to change history. This is another example of how the road to hell is paved with good intentions -- in this case, punishing Penn State and teaching everyone how terrible covering up child abuse is.
In our generation, we have seen truth not merely reduced as a value; it has been more or less removed from the list of virtues. History is increasingly what politically correct people want it to be.
In California, the country's largest purchaser of school texts, elementary and high school students, by law, must learn about the contributions to California and America of women, African Americans, Mexican Americans, entrepreneurs, Asian Americans, European Americans, American Indians and labor. This year, the California legislature passed another law -- the Fair, Accurate, Inclusive and Respectful Education Act -- which mandates teaching the contributions of gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people.
That American history is dominated by the contributions of White Anglo-Saxon Protestant males is irrelevant to all those who see history as a feel-good exercise, not the relating of what actually occurred. As the 325,000-member California Teachers Association, which has contributed so mightily to the decline of education in California, said in support of the LGBT bill: "We believe that school curriculum materials should adequately portray the diversity of our society."
In other words, according to California's teachers, the purpose of education is not to teach truth, it is to "adequately portray the diversity of our society."
In defending the new California law, Dean Vogel, president of the California Teachers Association, said, "There is no room for discrimination of any kind in our classrooms, our communities or our state."
But, by definition, history does discriminate. A history of classical music will discriminate in favor of Austrians and Germans. A history of jazz will discriminate in favor of blacks. And a history of the founding of America will discriminate in favor of WASP males. Otherwise they are not histories.
Whatever evil Joe Paterno and Penn State officials failed to stop, the 112 wins are wins.
Where will the NCAA draw its line? What other wrongs that have nothing to do with victories on the playing field will the NCAA nullify?
The lesson the NCAA is teaching young people -- that history and truth don't matter if enough powerful people don't want them to matter -- can be as injurious to society as the cover up was to the victims of Sandusky.
And not only to society. To individuals as well.
Thanks to the NCAA history rewrite, all those completely innocent Penn State football players who played their hearts out to win those 112 games, played for naught. The false NCAA history will record that they never won a game.
And what about the impact on former Florida State coach Bobby Bowden, who is now listed as the winningest coach in American college football history? Until the NCAA revision of history, he had the rather impressive title of second-most winning coach in American college football history. Now, he will be dogged by a permanent, though unwritten, asterisk next to his name.
If, as the NCAA report charges, Penn State's silence spoke volumes about Penn State's culture, what does America's silence in the face of the NCAA falsification of history say about ours?
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

16 Comments
Ed in Cordova, TN
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 8:51 AM
Great article, Mr. Prager!
Bruce R Pierce in Owensboro, Ky
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 9:01 AM
I'm glad you mentioned the kids involved, not just those victims of Sandusky, those kids that played their heart out on the Football Field and fought for every statistic on their record. The NCAA just took away all those hard earned records by saying those games have never been played. I am also a believer that the NCAA created more "victims" than Sandusky did, while hiding behind respectability.
Jim in Alabama
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 9:29 AM
"...I do not take issue with the other NCAA punishments of Penn State." Why? Why is punishing the innocent (i.e. the students, athletes and the entire State College community) for the crimes of a few specific, known and identifiable individuals, less offensive to you than the re-writing of history to which you rightly object?
Dave in CA
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 10:15 AM
Since all those involved in the heinous coverup are no longer at Penn State, the rest of the sanctions levied by the NCAA are punishing the innocent, not the guilty. I fail to see how this is moral.
For example, consider the $60M fine. As money is fungible, Penn State can just as easily forgo investment in a new library or new engineering labs as they can cut spending on their football program. This would directly impact the students of Penn State, the overwhelming majority of whom are there to gain an education and are in no way involved in Penn State football.
I think the NCAA missed a golden opportunity to institute major reforms of college sports. Division 1 football has become little more than a professional farm team system for the NFL. It's long past time to get the big money out of college sports and restore a proper balance between scholarship and athletics.
Dave
TimB in Baltimore
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 4:01 PM
it is not true that the those responsible are no longer at Penn State. Curley and Spanier are still at Penn State. Curley is on administrative leave.Spanier is still a tenured professor .
Although retired, Penn State is paying for Schultz's defense.
I believe McQueary is still on administrative leave as well, and he started the scandal by not calling the police in 2001.
Dave in CA
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 6:44 PM
Ahhh, I was not aware of that. I do wonder though how many of those who are still on leave will ever return.
In any event, I don't think my position changes. Are these individuals paying the $60M fine? Of course not. How many of the 40,000 students were involved? How many of the ~2,500 faculty? The sanctions will largely be felt by those who are entirely innocent of any wrongdoing.
Meanwhile, the NCAA has left the institution that is Division 1 College Football alone.
Dave
wjm in Colorado
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM
Being a progressively dominated body, don't ever expect the NCAA to get anything correct. Progressives love to re-write history and turn it into propoganda to further their marxist views, so the NCAA has no problem erasing victories, just another progressive lie. The NCAA, where a Native American mascot is hostile and abusive, unless there is an actual tribe that can be paid into silence and the mascot retained. Another useless organization, in par with the unions, that Colleges that teach courses other than altered propoganda should leave in droves. If you could find such institutions. Hillsdale comes to mind. Do you know of any others?
MEKub in Wisconsin
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 2:12 PM
FACTOID ALERT ""I recognize that Joe Paterno and the university officials enabled this evil to continue. ""
A factoid is a falsity that gets repeated often enough it comes to be accepted as fact. The REAL fact is, there is no evidence linking Paterno with any coverup. Freeh's statemets that Paterno was involved in a coverup are entirely unsupported by facts placed into evidence in his own report. The REAL fact is, Paterno reported the information McQ gave him to the people with authority to order an investigation and then stepped out of the way so they could do their jobs.
I saw an article the other day in which the author STILL referred to "Sandusky's alleged crimes." Even after his conviction of those crimes. Yet, no one has seen fit to use the word "alleged" when referring to Paterno's supposed involvement in a cover up. Its ok, though, he's dead. Voltaire said, "To the dead, we owe only truth."
Funny, if the evidence for this alleged coverup is so strong, why haven't Curley, Schultz, and Spanier been charged?
Richard Jewell, Wen Ho Lee, the Duke lacrosse team. Americans have learned nothing when it comes to trial by media.
TimB in Baltimore
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 4:07 PM
Curley and Schultz have been charged with perjury and failure to report. That is apparently about all they can be charged with under PA state law.
The failure to report charge is just a misdemeanor and may be dismissed for being beyond the statute of limitations.
Spanier still could be charged.
Penn State will very likely be fined under the federal Clery Act for not reporting a crime on campus.
CaseAce in L.A.
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 2:27 PM
And what of the bonuses and salaries that were handed out under (now) false pretenses, since their resume of accomplishments is non-existent?
TimB in Baltimore
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 3:57 PM
The NCAA failed to consult Sandusky's victims before they issued their draconian punishments.
Although not widely reported victim 4 released a statement via his lawyer that he was "dismayed" that the NCAA punished his "favorite university."
Do the victims blame the football team or do they blame Sandusky?
Garry in Oklahoma
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 4:44 PM
I don't know details of the case, but from what I read, Paterno and other officials did report at least some of the abuse but police dropped the case due to lack of evidence. What's Paterno supposed to do at that point? Continue to pursue a case on his own like a vigilante?
If the crimes had a material effect on the outcome of the football games, NCAA would be justified. But NCAA is just wanting to make a statement and punish someone. Too bad Paterno isn't still alive to defend himself.
Regardless of what NCAA says, in my mind, Paterno will alway be the most winning coach in college football until someone else wins 409 games.
enemaofthestatistquo in GA
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM
Dennis- I remember having the same thought when the Browns left Cleveland and moved to Baltimore and re-named themselves the Ravens. Then the NFL commissioner stripped the Ravens of all their previous history as the Browns to award it to the new Cleveland expansion franchise which was awarded the name Browns. Ignoring the legacy of one of the greatest football coaches and owners of an NFL franchise Paul Brown who started the Browns, then sold them to Art Modell and returned to the NFL as part owner and coach of the Cincinnati Bengals, the original uniforms of the Bengals had an remarkable and deliberate resemblance to the uniforms of the then original Cleveland Browns because Paul Brown has been forced out of the management and coachiing at Cleveland by his partner Art Modell.
Lyn87 in Kansas
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 11:46 PM
The NCAA can do or say whatever it wants - it will not change the facts one iota. Personally, I couldn't care less about the goings-on of a bunch of guys in tights grabbing each other on a striped field. Since I don't care, it's not possible to care LESS than that, but if it WERE possible to care less than that, I would care even less about statistics about guys who wear tights and grab each other on striped fields.
Having said that, apparently there are quite a lot of people who do seem to care about the goings-on of a bunch of guys who wear tights and grab each other on striped fields. The people who actually care enough about that to keep track of which guy coached which particular group of guys in tights the best will always know that some guy named Paterno was that guy.
I will give this all the brain-space it deserves, which means I will have forgotten the details by lunchtime tomorrow, but as a guy who thinks history (about important stuff, anyway) is worth getting right, this sort of nonsense offends me. Not because it matters that some guy named Paterno was a winning coach (so what?), but that a lot of people seem to think that the facts of history are subject to change when they fall outside what something thinks they ought to be.
Linda in New York
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM
When this story first broke it sounded like the Penn State players were the objects of the abuse. Not so. This was Sandusky activity to young boys not even part of the team. When he retired, i think Joe thought the problem was over.He did report the activity from info given to him. These boys were not part of the football program. Why punish the players?
Mike McGinn in People's Republic of Maryland
Wednesday, August 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM
Great discussion, Dennis! So what do we do if some day we learn that one of the people making this decision at the NCAA is a pedophile. Do we then have to go back and erase his decision to erase the record at Penn State?