The Right Opinion
The Loathsome Left
Inasmuch as Obama has suddenly begun referring to the Clinton years as the good old days, I feel it's only fair to do the same. I was not a fan of Clinton, but at least he had enough good sense to allow himself to be reined in by Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and the newly elected Republicans in 1994. By balancing the budget, reforming the welfare system and dumping HillaryCare, it even helped Clinton win re-election in '96.
Back then, I was no fan of the Democrats, but I merely thought they were all wet on the issues. In the years since, they have mutated like monsters in science fiction movies. They are no longer merely mistaken; rather, they are evil creatures against whom death rays should be employed. For the hopelessly literal-minded, I don't actually mean they should be vaporized. Instead, they should all be evicted from the White House and Congress in November. Of course if that doesn't come to pass, vaporization shouldn't be ruled out.
For those of you who remain unclear about the clear and present danger these arrogant morons pose to America, I'll remind you that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who is coming up on his 73rd birthday, had the following to say about his political opponents: "Karl Rove and the Republicans are looking forward to a breakfast the day after the election. They are going to assemble 17 angry old white men for the breakfast, some of whom will slobber in their food, some will have scrambled eggs and some will have oatmeal, because their teeth are gone. But those 17 angry old white men will say, "Hey, we just bought America. Wasn't so bad. We still have a lot of money left."
I acknowledge being an old codger, but I'm still 34 days younger than Reid, and I resent his caricature of elderly Republicans. Being blessed with all my teeth, including my rear molars, I am willing to bet that, with 32 in my mouth, I not only have more teeth than the man born to be a mortician, I have also retained more of my marbles than Senator Reid.
But, then, Reid, who owes his political career entirely to Las Vegas casino owners and Nevada's public sector unions, has always been known for his classy rhetoric. Some have even compared him to Churchill. Not Winston, of course, but Ward.
As you may have noticed, the Democrats have attacked Romney relentlessly for his connection to Bain Capital. What's odd about this is that under Romney's stewardship, Bain invested in such successful all-American enterprises as AMC Entertainment, Burger King, Domino's Pizza, Dunkin' Donuts, Toys "R" Us and Staples. Obama, on the other hand, has squandered billions of our tax dollars on Solyndra, Ener 1, Beacon Power, Abound Solar, Spectra Watt and Eastern Energy. The two things that all these green companies have in common is that they have all gone bankrupt and they were all generous contributors to Obama's election campaign in 2008.
When you compare the investment records of the two candidates, I would imagine that the expression about people who live in glass houses would inevitably spring to people's minds. But, naturally, that would be limited to those who have minds. Liberals, on the other hand, come equipped only with echo chambers that resonate with talking points supplied ad nauseam by the likes of Obama, Jay Carney, Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, David Axelrod and the aforementioned Harry Reid.
They aren't even embarrassed to parrot the same line. I mean, even if they wanted to make hay out of Romney's honest appraisal of the London Olympics, wouldn't you think that some Democrat would have come up with something besides "gaffe"? If I thought that Obama had, as usual, said something stupid, I might have said he "stuck his foot in the mouth," "tripped over his own tongue" or "foolishly opined," but once David Axelrod or one of his lap dogs in the media used "gaffe," none of the faithful dared veer off even slightly from the party line. I swear, if the Soviet dictators had been able to maintain this kind of discipline they'd still be going strong.
In the wake of the Chick-fil-A dust-up, the owners of every other fast food operation must be kicking themselves for not coming out in support of traditional marriage. In the wake of the threatened boycott by homosexuals, combined with the craven mayors of Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Washington, D.C. and Chicago, all threatening to ban the franchise, it's a wonder that there's a chicken walking around anywhere in North America. Whereas people used to say that a popular item was selling like hotcakes, they now say it's selling like Chick-fil-A sandwiches.
All that Dan Cathy, the president of Chick-fil-A, did was take advantage of the First Amendment to say what the majority of Americans honestly believe. He didn't say that he wouldn't hire gays or serve gays, so for homosexuals to insist that this was somehow akin to the Civil Rights movement proves that a great many of them are not only vicious and bigoted, but lack even a smattering of commonsense.
These dumb clucks seem to believe that the First Amendment gives them the right to insult and bully with impunity. Moreover, they are convinced that, thanks entirely to their odd sexual practices, they are entitled to a special status that allows them to be America's moral arbiters.
As is typical with those on the Left, they assume, whether they're trying to put a chicken franchise operation out of business or shout down conservative speakers on college campuses, that the same Constitution that gives them the right to spew fatuous nonsense also gives them the authority to deny freedom of speech to those of us who regard them as loudmouth ninnies.
In threatening Chick-fil-A, Mayor Rahm Emanuel claimed that the company wasn't welcome in his city because it lacked Chicago values. I must confess that was a real head-scratcher. Chicago values? Try as hard as I could, the only things that came to mind were corrupt politicians; dead people getting to vote in local, state and national, elections; and having the distinction of being the "Murder Capital of America."
I know that Mr. Cathy is extremely fond of his illiterate slogan, "Eat Mor Chikin," but he might consider adopting "Our Chickens Don't Have Chicago Values."

59 Comments
JPL in Mid-Hudson Valley
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 12:42 AM
Burt, Along with posting calorie counts and banning big gulps, it won't be long before the big cities will try to require resturants to post the religious and political affiliations of the owners. Now these idiots say it's "immoral' to proclaim that you believe in traditional Biblical values. Whats next? This country is going to hell in a handbasket with the liberal facists in charge.
JPL in Mid-Hudson Valley
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 12:48 AM
That's "fascists". Dislike them so much I can't spell their name properly.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 1:19 PM
JPL: I understand. Spelling is easy, it's typing that's tricky.
Burt
Linda Cebrian in Rhinebeck, NY
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 12:45 PM
"Now these idiots say it's 'immoral' to proclaim that you believe in traditional Biblical values. Whats next?"
Well, JPL, how about our own state senator, Sellout-Steve Saland, who now says that authentic marriage is "extreme?"
http://www.citizens4freedom.com/Articles/tabid/1387/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/7491/NY-State-Senator-Saland-Calls-Traditional-Marriage-Position-Extreme.aspx
Linda Cebrian in Rhinebeck, NY
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM
I wish Burt would write an article about politicians such as this who poison the system, betray their constituents and contribute to the cynicism of the electorate.
enemaofthestatistquo in GA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 2:54 AM
JPL; "require resturants to post the religious and political affiliations of the owners", That has actually happened before in central Europe the 1930's.The mortician Harry Reid is presently presiding over thefuneral arrangements for the late great United States.
tod-the tool guy in brooklyn N.Y.
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 6:01 AM
Mr Dan Cathy is building an Empire. That certainly takes guts, wisdom, tenacity, fortitude, and character. What is being built by the LEFT?? I like the mortician analogy. Every single gov regulation, edict, and fiat, by the Marxists, is a nail in Freedom's coffin! #44-out the door & no more Marxist moldy bread for hungry Americans. Save me a spot at Chick-fil-A, please.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM
Tod & Enema: I am delighted to see my reference to Harry Reid as the mortician is catching on. Not only does he sound and look like a caricature of one, but his chosen role is to handle the multitude of details required in burying a great nation.
Burt
Deborah in La Mirada CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 7:22 AM
For more years than I like to think about, my personal nickname for the despicable Reid has been "Uriah Heap". Every time I am forced to look at him, my mind's eye evokes the hand wringing image of the Dickens character Reid so closely resembles. He cannot depart the scene soon enough to suit me! I wish for his retirement (along with all the others we could name for the umpteenth time) quickly. Hopefully, the American people will help to arrange that in November. It can't get here soon enough for me.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 1:25 PM
"Uriah Heep" is good, too. But too many people wouldn't get the reference. In a way it's a shame that while several Democrats lost their Senate seat in 2010, Reid was re-elected. It just goes to show how stupid the voters in Nevada are that in spite of having the highest unemployment rate in America, they still trooped out to vote for the choice of casino owners and SEIU members.
Burt
Clark in Columbus, Ohio
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 at 1:03 PM
Burt, I happened to love Uriah Heep . . . The band from the '70's!!! Still do. I never read the tome by Shakespeare, but I have to agree that that smarmy, cloying POS that "leads" the US Senate should have been put down in 2010. I couldn't believe that turd won! Maybe he can be impeached for obstruction after the election IF Romney/Ryan win.
Adrien Nash in Crescent City, CA
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 4:08 AM
For a long time I've have a feeling that H. Reid reminded me of someone but the resemblance was more one of personality than spittin' image. Now I know who it was that was the ghost-like memory in my subconscious. It was exactly Uriah Heap. What a despicable character. Now we have our very own American version. Yuuck.
Doktor Riktor Von Zhades in Western KY
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM
Just my dos centavos here; When the left calls for social justice, they usually mean for "just us"
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 1:29 PM
Excellent, Doktor.
Burt
PSU in CT
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 10:54 AM
Burt: I usually get at least one smile out of each of your columns, but "[n]ot Winston, of course, but Ward" was a genuine laugh-out-loud moment. Thanks.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM
Thank you, PSU. It's nice when people enjoy the articles, but it's even nicer when they refer to certain lines.
Burt
Clark in Columbus, Ohio
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 at 1:06 PM
Well, Burt, I have to "me, too!" on the Ward Churchill reference. Yet another lefty POS!
Holmes Simons in Tampa
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM
Burt, I cannot understand how the minuscule percentage of gay people has been so misguided by their flaming activists. I had breakfast at Chic-Fil-A recently, and they cordially served me a fruit cup and homogenized milk for my decaf, and I wasn't even wearing my rainbow scarf. I find that queer, don't you?
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 7:35 PM
Clearly, at Chick-fil-A, they live by the motto that the customer is always right even if he's Left.
Burt
BNgranny in MO
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 2:10 PM
Burt, As usual I saved your column for last so I can smile the rest of the day. I think the "evil creatures" should be lined up and shot for treason. (Of course, that requires people in the House w/ the balls to bring charges.) Then you suggest death rays -- excellent! So much less mess to clean up if they're just vaporized.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 7:36 PM
BN: I am always in favor of tidiness, so death rays it is.
Burt
Richard Ryan in Lamar,Missouri
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 2:51 PM
Burt, the health department wouldn`t approve Chicago values for Chick-fil-A. They wouldn`t let them slaughter chickens with tommyguns. I`m not sure if there`s any substance to it, but the rumor is that Obama is going to run Sylvester Stallone as VP, Nancy(scarface)Pelosi as Secretary of State and their motto will be Sambo, Rambo, and Bimbo: without Dumbo. Catchy, is it not?
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 7:37 PM
Richard: What do you mean, without Dumbo? If Joe Biden and Harry Reid have announced their retirement, I haven't heard about it.
Burt
Ragweed in West Virginia
Monday, August 13, 2012 at 12:17 PM
Good one, Richard. The problem is finding one to fill the "Dumbo" name. There are so many candidates it's frustrating.
Robert the Bruce in Northern CA
Monday, August 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM
So many choices; so little time!
Tex Horn in Texas
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 3:43 PM
@ Mac and Burt: It's me, Mac, Gloomy Gus, aka Tex Horn. I did not realize you were serious in upping our wager. If the offer is still open, I'll take it, even though I hope I lose. The selection of Ryan for VP is encouraging, but the liberal media is already obeying Obama's command to get all the dirt on him they can. I doubt they will find much.
At the risk if being redundant, here's the post that Mac responded to on another writer's forum. Since Mac has responded, perhaps Burt would also like to add a gloomy title to my good Texas name. I still believe the following to be true, although perhaps too late in this election game, but perhaps not in 2016:
You have probably seen the latest Fox News poll: Romney is trailing by 9%. Why, you may ask? Because Romney is running on "the economy, stupid." This race isn't about the economy, it's about ideology. Were it about the economy, Romney would be running away with it. He's not. He's sinking like a rock. Look at Obama out on the campaign trail. He's got fire in his belly, and he's not talking economy (for obvious reasons), he's talking ideology. And he's winning.
Some have said that Obama wants the U.S. to be like Europe. We already are, my friends. Like most European nations, it's come down to Conservatives v. Liberals (i.e., socialists). That's what we have here in the U.S. now. So, it is about ideology. Yet, Romney still has no fire in his belly for his self-described conservative principles. Obama's ideologically-based attack ads are working and Romney's response is like some nerd being picked on by a bully: "That's not nice!" So, he's losing. Blame the Republican establishment. They have failed to see that this race is about ideology and have not picked a candidate that will fight that fight, fire against fire. It appears that America as we have known it is gone forever. We are now a socialist state. We can have hope, but hope will not win this election. Picking the right candidate who will faithfully fight for the Conservative ideology might.
Let me hear it, Burt!
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 7:43 PM
Tex: It is only early August. We haven't even had the convention or the debates yet. At this point, Carter led Reagan in the polls and Dukakis led G.H.W. Bush. Playing the poll game three months before the election is a waste of time
If Romney came across as a firebrand it would be as phony as when Hillary was campaigning below the Mason/Dixon Line in 2008 and tried to sound like a southern belle. Romney is who he is, a decent, intelligent, self-made, successful American. If that's not good enough to defeat Obama, who is none of those things, don't blame Romney, blame the American voter.
By the way, because it was too hot for tennis, my wife and I went to see "2016." Well-worth seeing even if you think you know everything about B.H. Obama.
Burt
Holmes Simons in Tampa
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Burt, even Obama does not know all there is to know about Obama. All he knows was written in The Book of Obama while he and little Billy Ayers were smoking dope on the patio.
Patrick in Houston
Monday, August 13, 2012 at 2:45 PM
Burt, back in 2008 Hillary wasn't trying to sound like a southern belle. She was pandering for the black vote and was trying (and failing miserably) to sound like an old black woman. In any other context that would have been roundly condemned for what it was: racial stereotyping, but the media ignored it entirely.
India in Georgia
Monday, August 13, 2012 at 6:33 PM
"Hillary was campaigning below the Mason/Dixon Line in 2008 and tried to sound like a southern belle."
UUUGGGHHHH!!! I am grateful for many things---I think the fact that I missed that pathetic act just went to the top of the list.
Have y'all noticed that when Obama speaks to affluent whites, he sounds like an affluent white guy? But when he speaks to predominately black groups the patronizing racist uses simpler vocabulary and a FAKE Southern accent. Listen to the "You didn't build that" speech. "I worked harder'n everybody else", and "Somebody, somewhere along the lahhn gave you some help".
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=you+didn't+build+that+&mid=4C694CC6F2D0A84102F64C694CC6F2D0A84102F6&view=detail&FORM=VIRE2
Is he hoping we will believe he's from Birmingham? Or maybe that's just the way they talk in Indonesia. I could just puke.
India in Georgia
Monday, August 13, 2012 at 6:39 PM
Oh, I meant to add that I have managed to talk my husband into taking me all the way to Atlanta to see "2016".
Popcorn: $7.00 Coke: $4.50 Movie tickets: $24.00 Gas money: $75.00
I can't wait!! :)
wjm in Colorado
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 2:15 PM
@Tex, If you watched to the end of the segment, Bret Baier admitted the poll was weighed hevily in favor of the Democrats by 11%, so if it was tallied by 9% in favor of the marxists, they are acutally losing.
Tex Horn in Texas
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 5:53 PM
Mac, I took your "Gloomy Gus" comment as nothing personal. We're obviously on the same side, we just have a differing view of how the campaign is progressing. I admire your "stick-to-it" attitude and can only hope you are right. Ten smackers it is, my friend.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 11:10 PM
So if I've got this straight, Tex, you are wagering $20 against us. I just want to make sure what's riding on this bet. I mean, aside from the future of America and therefore the entire free world.
Burt
Dave C in Seattle
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 6:04 PM
The Chick-Fil-A event was a great example or the first amendment "freedom of speech." But, another first amendment right made an equally powerful statement - the "freedom to peaceably assemble". I can only OWS and the radical left learned something.
Harry Reid is a coward - making his libelous statements under the protection of speaking from the floor of the Senate. The fact that he blocks everything the House Republicans try to accomplish, he should be called "Blockhead".
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 7:47 PM
Dave: "Blockhead" works for me. Also, we all know that the word missing from your reference to OWS and the radical left was "hope." We've all done it. But of course those pinheads never learn anything, except how to make louder, filthier and more annoying fools of themselves.
Burt
Dave C in Seattle, WA
Wednesday, August 15, 2012 at 4:42 PM
You're right Burt. I'd lost Hope. I'll try to Change that.
Dave
Howard Last in Wyoming
Saturday, August 11, 2012 at 11:28 PM
Maybe the Republican big shots (you can't call them leaders) will change it to a Ryan - Romney ticket. If they did a similar thing in 2008 we probably would not be stuck with Barry.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 1:36 AM
Howard: Not even a ticket of Prelutsky & Last or Last & Prelutsky could have won the election in 2008. Not after the financial meltdown. Prior to that, even McCain & Palin were leading in the polls.
Burt
Adrien Nash in Crescent City, CA
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 4:26 AM
"the Republican big shots"... Please, get with the 21st Century. The big shots are not calling the shots. The voters in the primary elections and caucuses called all the shots when it comes to which candidate accumulates the most electors. What does free and open elections have to do with big shots calling the shots? It's not like two or three candidates arriving at the convention with equal numbers of supporters. Only in a tie situation could party big-wigs make the final decision. So how about dropping talk of party big-shots deciding who the candidate is. That is fantasy talk from a world in which elections don't happen or don't have any effect.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 1:20 PM
Adrien: I couldn't agree more. For years now, I've tried to explain that presidential candidates really are the result of the primary system, whether they're Clinton, McCain, Obama, Romney or any other nominee over the past several years. If anyone doesn't believe it, I suggest they ask the likes of Joe Biden, Lyndon Johnson, Hillary Clinton, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, all of them Party big shots. Some people, though, are caught in a time warp back to the days when a few big city bosses went into a smoke-filled room and came out with the presidential candidate.
Burt
Howard Last in Wyoming
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM
Burt & Adrien - you are correct in that the party members vote in the primary, but the big shots determine how the vote will be done and who is on the ballot. They also send out info on the candidates which is tilted to the ones they support. They will challenge the petitions that are required to get on the ballot of the candidates they oppose. And many times will give lip service to the candidates that win the primary or outright oppose them. Case in point the elections for senator in Delaware and Nevada. ho do they back with money?
Tex Horn in Texas
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Burt, you make some very good points. You're right, a stiff like Romney can't show any real fire in his belly. He would come off, as you say, like Hillary trying to be a southern black. It's a shame though, because that is the primary reason I hear when people don't like him. He just doesn't seem authentic. But, maybe that makes no difference in the end, because Obama seems authentic, but we all know it's lies and deceit.
And yes, it's a $20 wager now. Frankly, I truly wish you and Mac the best of luck, because if I win, we all lose.
Burt Prelutsky in North Hills, CA
Sunday, August 12, 2012 at 1:24 PM
Frankly, I don't know why people think Romney is stiff. I suppose it's all in the eye of the beholder....or people are simply buying into left-wing sound bites. To me, he comes across as intelligent, decent and competent. Which just happens to be what I want to see in a president. They also happen to be three things that Barack Obama isn't.
Burt