ClockworkJillian in New York
Monday, January 21, 2013 at 8:23 PM

The Constitution does exist, in part, to protect the rights of the minority from the actions of the majority. This being the case:

  1. I will assume that you are wholly in favor of gay marriage, which is quite possibly the most clear-cut example of a minority requiring protection from the majority today.

  2. I would like to note that protecting the rights of the minority, and imposing the will of the minority on the majority, are not synonymous acts.

  3. I believe we are at a technological impasse of sorts in regard to the Second Amendment, as it is all too clear that a well-regulated, rifle-armed militia will simply pose no opposition to the extraordinary weapons afforded to the United States military. Please advise: should we consider de-fanging the military, so that the militia might stand a better chance; or would it be more appropriate to distribute Predator drones and Hellfire missiles to the public?

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

required, displayed
required, displayed
required, not displayed