The Right Opinion

Frozen

By Ken Blackwell · Feb. 9, 2013

Editor's Note: This column was coauthored by Bob Morrison.

President Obama's senior thesis at Columbia University has been embargoed. It is said to be an endorsement of the Nuclear Freeze Movement that was so much the cause célèbre of the left here and throughout Western Europe in the Reagan years. We may have to wait for his presidential library to open to find out.

And we may have to wait until then, too, to learn whether young Barack Obama attended the massive, one million plus Nuclear Freeze rally in Central Park in June, 1982. It's hard to imagine that the young student who, he tells us in his book Dreams from My Father, consciously sought out the Marxist professors on campus would have missed this huge anti-nuclear demonstration unfolding on his doorstep. It's odd, too, that he seems never to have been asked about this during two campaigns for the White House or during any press conference.

Why is this important now? Because now is when President Obama's promise to be “flexible” with Russia's Vladimir Putin is being redeemed. Mr. Obama has just tapped as his Sec. of State John Kerry, the man who rode into the Senate as the most outspoken proponent of the Nuclear Freeze. Kerry was never held accountable for that full-throated embrace of the Soviet Union's Number One foreign policy objective for almost the full decade of the 1980s.

Even when Kerry ran for president in 2004, opponents focused on his 1971 testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee as a youthful, long-haired anti-Vietnam War protester, and not on the fact that he helped to further the KGB's goals as a U.S. Senator.

Of course, President Obama's choice of former Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska to be the next Sec. of Defense seems incomprehensible to many in Washington. He's so obviously unfit. Even his defenders – like former Indiana Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh – concede that “[Hagel] didn't bring his 'A-game' to his confirmation hearings.” Imagine that: a Sec. of Defense-designate whom even his backers say was unprepared.

The Hagel choice only makes sense if you realize that Obama and Kerry would not want a civilian leader in the Pentagon making waves as they seek to disarm and disable the United States of America. Hagel will be a loyal member of the “go along to get along gang,” if confirmed.

We now know that the Soviet KGB, the deadly secret police, was a leading pusher of the Nuclear Freeze and they had thousands of willing accomplices on the left. They wanted to be able to put Soviet missiles in Eastern Europe and have the West respond with a “Freeze” on their own deployment of Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles – Cruise and Pershing rockets.

The best way to think of that policy goal is to think of the rabbit and the boa constrictor. The boa moves menacingly toward the rabbit and the rabbit freezes, hoping the boa won't notice him. But to the boa, the rabbit is lunch.

Left-wing advocates of the Freeze, like Bill Hyland, argued publicly that our freezing would create a world outcry for the Soviets to withdraw their own IRBM's from Easte3rn Europe.

Harvard's Polish-born biographer of Stalin, the great Adam Ulam, punctured Hyland's pretty bubble when he asked him in his heavily-accented English: “An' wot will you doo iff they dun't?”

President Reagan wisely and courageously resisted calls for the Nuclear Freeze. He believed the United States' strength should always be “second to none.” He advocated instead a Zero Option under which both sides would massively reduce their nuclear and conventional weapons. He was careful always to say: Trust but verify. Which was his polite way of saying: We aren't going to trust you without proof.

Today, America's foreign and defense policies are being crafted at the top by those who so obviously failed in the great Cold War struggle of the 1980s. The Freezeniks are in power now.

And their negotiating partner, Vladimir Putin, knows what he can get from them in the way of flexibility. No other world leader is a former KGB agent. It may well be that Putin rose through the ranks of that dreaded outfit by crafting the very policies that credulous Western “peace” politicians fell for.

We don't know if young Barack Obama was on board for the Freeze, but Vladimir Putin knows. Russia's spy network has never been dismantled. In 2010 the FBI caught ten Russian spies just before the famed “Hamburger Summit” between President Obama and Putin's seat-warmer, Dmitri Medvedev, the spies were allowed to leave the U.S. without extensive questioning, without so much as a TSA pat-down.

When Russia briefly tasted freedom in the 1990s, happy throngs tore down the Moscow statue of Felix Dzerzhinksi, the founder of the Soviet secret police. “Iron Felix's” bust was quietly returned to Russia's police headquarters by Vladimir Putin, shortly after he resumed power in 2000.

It is to this man, this successor to creators of the Gulag where millions died, that President Obama gave his promise to be “flexible” after the election. Frozen in fear; flexibile to our foes. That's the best summary of U.S. foreign policy now.

11 Comments

Tod the tool guy in brooklyn ny said:

Lon ago, O'zilla went hard LEFT, and FROZE THERE! Whoever he is ,---he ain't US(A). I'm praying that God will bring him down!

Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 6:15 AM

wjm in Colorado said:

There is only one word to descibe the Foreign Policy of Chairman Obamao, and that is TREASON. The party of Marx is in league with our enemies with the goal of total destruction of American Founding Principals, and the transformation of the US into some Marxist Statist Utopian, where They RULE. Our useless representatives in Congress are frozen, unable to try and convict this criminal regime.

Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM

Wayne in Hinesville, GA said:

I can't help but think that Odumbo is in league with Putin to slowly dismantle the United States ability to resist Russia's expansionist agenda. As long as we have a strong military that causes Putin to be careful in pushing his agenda. Now that Odumbo has the possibility of two yes men in Kerry and Hagel the dismantling of our military can move along at a faster pace. No matter what happens with sequestration this adminstration will slowly but surely continue to draw down our military. The Republicans had better grow a set of cojones before it is too late. I'm beyond the age of learning a new language.

Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 11:11 AM

Michiganmitch in Canton, Mi replied:

"I can't help but think"
Really? You had most of us fooled!

Monday, February 11, 2013 at 8:42 AM

Eleanor in AK said:

So sympathetic - Could there be a KGB agent in the White House?

Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 12:57 PM

William in FL said:

Let's not kid ourselves! Obama will have a presidential liabrary resembling a palace for a king! A large statue outside resembing Saddam Hussane's statue we all watched fall on T.V. !!! While inside a group of people still trying to cover up his birth certificate / phony college credits etc. Hell- the professor at a college he claims to have been in and in his classroom at first did not remember him until after he was called by the White House and convinced!!!

Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 5:44 PM

Doktor Riktor Von Zhades in Western KY said:

I would suggest further reading about this topic in the book "Reagan, In His Own Hand: The Writings of Ronald Reagan that Reveal His Revolutionary Vision for America" It touches very often on the SALT treaties and how the US gave up much and the USSR basically giving up nothing in return. Indeed, one can hear Adam Ulam saying "An' wot will you doo iff they dun't?" Well, what will you do Mr. President?

Sunday, February 10, 2013 at 2:28 PM

Michiganmitch in Canton, Mi said:

This column is historically inaccurate, steeped in RW mythology and not well thought out. The views of the author and those offering comments are proof of the demise of the Republican Party. Keep it up Whigs, we can't wait! What would one expect from the guy who "fixed" Ohio?

Monday, February 11, 2013 at 8:48 AM

sfj in Alabama replied:

Name 1 myth.

Monday, February 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM

dhonig in Indianapolis, IN said:

What else do you expect of somebody who once said “We seek the total elimination one day of nuclear weapons from the face of the Earth.”

No, wait. Sorry, my mistake. That was Ronald Reagan, in his 1985 Inaugural Address.

Monday, February 11, 2013 at 9:09 AM

Lynne in Gainesville, FL replied:

Clearly Obama ghostwrote that sentence in Reagan's speech and no one noticed until it was too late.

Monday, February 11, 2013 at 10:01 AM