The Right Opinion

Why Is Washington So Polarized?

By John C. Goodman · Feb. 17, 2013

People who have been around for a while all seem to agree. Never in living memory has the atmosphere on Capitol Hill and in Washington, D.C., generally been so toxic.

I don't find this to be true out in the hinterland. The country as a whole is divided politically. But it's not obviously more divided than it was 50 years ago. The toxicity of politics is a D.C. phenomenon. What's more, the polarization is worse among the elites. It seems that the more education they have, the more polarized people become.

Why is that?

I have a theory. Any period in which there is radical political change is likely to be a period when raw emotions are strained. The reason: political change means we are moving from an old system to a new one. When that happens, people who were wedded to the old system will perceive that they are losing something – a way of life, a shared way of looking at the world, institutions that they relied on.

We are living in such a period. Over the past 30 years the entire world has seen a complete reversal in the political trend of the twentieth century. There was a time, not long ago, when many of us believed that the march toward communism and socialism was inevitable. Country after country moved left. In the first eight decades of the twentieth century, I can't think of a single place where individual liberty increased – unless you count the aftermath of war in Germany, Italy and Japan.

Collectivism, it seemed, was unstoppable.

Then, in the last two decades of the last century, everything changed. Communism was dismantled almost everywhere. It was not only politically dismantled. Collectivism was intellectually discredited. All around the world, a new wave of thinking emerged – one which saw that the left was wrong. Wrong about everything. Wrong about communism. Wrong about socialism. Wrong about the welfare state.

In country after country, the power of government was rolled back – through deregulation and privatization. It's hard to exaggerate how fundamental this change has been. When Ronald Reagan was president, not even the most conservative politician would dare talk about privatizing Social Security. This was true in other countries as well. Yet today, more than 30 countries around the world have fully or partially privatized their social security systems. We haven't done it yet. But we've discovered that a presidential candidate can talk about it and still win two elections.

About 40 countries now have a flat tax and tax rates have been generally falling almost everywhere. In Europe, talk of privatizing health, education and welfare was once as taboo as talk of privatizing Social Security was in the US. No longer.

Sweden, once thought of as the model for the modern welfare state, now has a full-fledged school voucher system, has privatized large segments of its health care system and is on the way toward privatization of almost all of its welfare state. Britain, which once boasted that its system of socialized medicine was “the envy of the world” has been privatizing health services for the past decade. Since 2008, National Health Service (NHS) patients have been able to choose any provider (NHS, private for-profit, private non-profit, etc.) they wish for elective care.

The dismantling of the state has not been smooth or even continuous. Some countries have seen reversals. Venezuela, Argentina, Ecuador and France come to mind. In our country we have gone from Bill Clinton's declaration that the era of big government is over to a massive new entitlement created by ObamaCare.

These reversals give people on the left hope that the trend is not inevitable. Rather than being resigned to defeat, they see hope that collectivism might rise again.

A persistent myth is the idea that polarization and toxicity in politics has originated on the right. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Tea Party folks are…well…just plain folks with a point of view. If you want to find real bitterness, go interview the participants of Occupy Wall Street.

Paul Krugman is a New York Times columnist who routinely questions the motives, the ethics and even the sanity of people who disagree with him. You can't find editorials on the right that come close to his routine level of vitriol.

For the most part, the left in this country feels deeply threatened by events occurring all over the world. Every cherished belief of theirs is proving to be wrong. The institutions they revere are being dismantled.

They're mad.


Tod the tool guy in brooklyn ny said:

"John, let's pretend for a moment here." Conservatives must all move to the South pole, so dress warm. Liberals must all move to the North Pole, so rent some snow shoes. After staying one year in these polarized climate zones, the group that stays financially SOLVENT, gets to move back to the tropics. "John, we know who's moving back,---don't we!"

Sunday, February 17, 2013 at 6:30 AM

wjm in Colorado said:

The left is mad, as in insane, collectively embracing an ideology that has always failed. Maybe they just dont' care about failure, but only have a delusional need to rule and control. In any case, it is hard for those who embrace the Constitution to wish anything other than total fail for the Traitors among us, Domestic Enemies of the State. Many have sworn an oath against these criminal minds.

Sunday, February 17, 2013 at 8:43 AM

Howard Last in Wyoming replied:

Tod, MAC & wjm: Just keep your powder dry. The civil war will probably start in 2015. I do not see any way to avoid it. Unless heavenly intervention.

Sunday, February 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM

Anton D Rehling in Olympia, WA replied:

The civil war has already begun as we are standing on the cartage box, pleading for government to not infringe upon our rights and to stop the insane spending, taxing and regulating us to death and all they want to do is yank the box we are standing on out from under the feet that is keeping the cartage box closed. They want to take our 2nd amendment away through infringement.
Government acts like our money is their money our lives are for them to control; That my fellow citizens is Slavery pure and simple.

Sunday, February 17, 2013 at 4:58 PM

Anton D Rehling in Olympia, WA replied:

I would like to add that the only thing that is not happening is a lead dialog between the citizens and the despots in out government

Sunday, February 17, 2013 at 5:00 PM

Anton D Rehling in Olympia, WA replied:


Sunday, February 17, 2013 at 5:01 PM

Wayne in Hinesville, GA said:

In my opinion, and we all know about opinions, somehow the left really believes that we can become a Utopian society. A society where everyone is equal and everyone has the same standard of living. Throughout the history of the world this has never come to pass and never will. Eventually those put in power to make decisions become the elite while those below them become the worker bees. Then corruption rears its ugly head and then those worker bees become pawns of the government. Liberals are the pawns and assholes like Pelosi, Reid, Conyers, Schumer, Odumbo, etc, are the corrupt in power. God help this once great nation because its for sure the RINO"s are not helping.

Sunday, February 17, 2013 at 5:34 PM

GeorgePA in PA said:

DC has too much power, it's involved in too many things. That's a time-tested formula for creating polarization.

Monday, February 18, 2013 at 12:10 PM

Steve in Macon, GA said:

The Utopian is one who believes that socialism and collectivism--- despite the fact it has never worked anywhere at anytime in human history---- will somehow work when we get the right leader and spend the high enough amount.

Isn't it ironic that they display a FAITH that is far beyond the religious faith they so roundly scorn and condemn.

Monday, February 18, 2013 at 12:24 PM

Steve in Macon, GA said:

Tom Woods explains the scam here:

Monday, February 18, 2013 at 12:49 PM