The Right Opinion
Atheism: What a Joke
Assuming, no doubt, our anxious world could use a good laugh, Stephen Hawking undertakes to provide one. He says the universe created itself.
The theory itself isn't the joke. The joke is the dogged persistence of atheists trying in the face of common sense to persuade the world as to the wisdom they see in their every utterance. Another way of putting it would be, atheism is the joke.
The likes of Hawking, Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins -- how, by the way, does Britain, the land that bred Lewis, Chesterton and Wesley, manage to produce so many certified atheists? -- Hawking & Co., I say, want everyone to see God as, I guess, some sort of celestial intrusion in the affairs of intelligent men and women.
Hawking's new book, "The Grand Design," (written with one Leonard Mlodinow) argues that "the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."
I suppose the intent of such stuff is to render non-atheists, Christians especially, mute and fearful. Which is more than a little bit odd. Who is likely to grow mute in the face of a bald claim that the universe more or less invented itself? Was Hawking there with his camera? That would be the first question. Soon other questions would follow. The vast variety of life -- that was spontaneous, too? The human organism -- the brain, the eye, the ear, the digestive tract -- just sort of, you know, happened? The sky, the seas, the seasons, not to mention human reproduction -- those things, too? And the greatest minds of history failed to catch on, century after God-fearing century? That or they practiced denial? Uhhhh ... yeah.
There is a poignancy to the atheist fixation on showing up God. What's wrong with these people? Many of them are technically intelligent (Hawking is routinely labeled "brilliant"), but they swallow with satisfied smiles the intellectual bilge called atheism. They've been doing it forever -- so long indeed that taking an atheist seriously requires a leap of faith so enormous that no one, least of all the atheist himself, can see from jumping-off spot to landing point.
The atheist mode is pure assertion. It's, shut up, listen here, I'm giving you numskulls The Facts. I imagine there have been, here and there, pleasant atheists. If so, one rarely runs across them. They've all got some Hawking, some Hitchens, some Mencken or Shaw or Robert Ingersoll in them: the desire to strut before the Stupid Masses; to show off a bit; to puncture the illusions of folk less enlightened than themselves, pinned down by the weight of superstition and terror. What a bunch of rubes and yokels, these believers! Not that they don't come in handy as rhetorical foils and customers.
It's really all too funny, as things tend to get when certain people -- over and over without pause -- do the same stupid things. Such as instruct the whole of human history to get off this God thing and start believing in spontaneous creation. I can see it all now, can't you? -- The Church of Spontaneous Creation; services whenever you're feeling spontaneous; come feel the creative power surge through your veins; learn to laugh at fools and frauds and idiots stupid enough to disagree with the doctrine of "It All Just Happened."
It is funny: like W.C. Fields assuming the posture of sobriety, Malvolio the pose of Lady's Man. The obverse of Reality is the Ridiculous -- that which makes itself farcical precisely by taking itself with deep earnestness.
If, against the testimony of civilization, the atheists ever find anything new or remotely plausible to say about God, that would be a red letter day in the history of the world. While we wait, how's about a story? This atheist, see, walks into a bar ...
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM

136 Comments
Rick
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 12:57 AM
It would have been nice if you would have explained HOW, according to Hawking, the universe created itself -- instead of going on this unoriginal, typically theistic, rant on how silly such a proposition is. Or maybe, just maybe, you didn't actually read the book? Reading this article, it's also obvious you don't agree with evolutionary theory, since it seems your simple, little brain just cannot digest how everything in this wonderful and fascinating universe could have formed and evolved without a creator. Atheism a joke? More like the joke's on you.
Rich Wilson
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 2:04 AM
"I suppose the intent of such stuff is to render non-atheists, Christians especially, mute and fearful."At least you don't claim to know the intent. Which is a good thing, because in the case of Hawkings, I'm quite certain your are incorrect. Hawkings (and Mlodinow) don't care if anyone believes in God or not, and in fact never claim that he doesn't exist."The atheist mode is pure assertion. It's, shut up, listen here, I'm giving you numskulls The Facts."Funny, that's exactly how I would describe the religious mode.
Irony
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 2:11 AM
I am afraid that it is people like your self that make believers look simple minded (I do not however think that all believers are simple minded by any standard). If you are going to refute Atheist's beliefs (which are based upon evidence not faith) then it is always a good idea to forward evidence to back up your claims.Making silly statements like Atheist's think that the eye balls just happened is ignorant at best. No Atheist believes that, they/we believe that the Universe and our world including life evolved over billions of years and did not happen in a blink of an eye. To keep spouting such ridiculous claims that are not even intelligent enough to constitute a serious argument then it only shows that you do not look beyond the Bible for your research.Atheists welcome arguments against their beliefs, if you have real evidence to back up your claims then please write about them. If your evidence is convincing then I am sure that you would make many Atheists at least re-consider their positions.Whenever I hear religious people complain about Atheists it tends to be about there delivery as opposed to the content of their beliefs.This in itself is very ironic when you consider the lengths that various religions have gone and indeed still do go to in the effort to further their cause.An example:(Believer: If you do not bow down to God and accept that he is your savior and the only purveyor of truth in life then you will burn for eternity in HELL.Atheist: That is nonsense, what evidence do you have to back up your claims?Believer: You are an extremist atheist Nazi, God will punish you).For believers to complain that Atheists are extreme is ironic at best.If you want to be taken seriously then try putting together a serious argument to back up your claims.
Mandamus
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 2:14 AM
They're not trying to show up god. He doesn't exist. You accomplish nothing with this article other than prove to all observers that you have a small mind.
Roger Abrahamsson
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 2:21 AM
You didn't actually read the book did you.
Rich
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 2:51 AM
snigger
A Good Templar
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 3:00 AM
The Church of Spontaneous Creation? Why, I think that's the same one I attended to celebrate Pray for Christopher Hitchens Day.
Johann
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 3:24 AM
A rather entertaining article, but not the way you intended.
ErnieWilliams
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 3:44 AM
"It's really all too funny, as things tend to get when certain people -- over and over without pause -- do the same stupid things"You mean like killing abortion doctors, fly airplanes into skyscrapers, mass suicide, persecute homosexuals, death threats over cartoons that insult your god? Yep , that's people who will set you straight about values. Why shouldn't we question faith? Atheists NEVER threaten violence or result to the nasty depths of a good portion of religious people Religion is losing out. You only have ONE life, not two, so get it right.
David
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 4:03 AM
Sir, you are my new hero.. Pointing out a flaw in the opponents thinking and then make the exact flaw in the same sentence, in just about every sentence of your article.. I applaud you:)
Jack
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 6:18 AM
And the rest of the universe... God just created that for a laugh did he? Or do you believe we're one of many petrie dishes? Also, the atheist will never say anything "plausable" about a so called "God", because an atheist doesn't believe in a "god".And what was god's reason for creating us? Maybe he was like us, and was looking for a meaning in life... got bored and created us, so he could boss us around, and tell us what to do with out lives? These are just a few of the reasons I am an atheist!
Dave
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 6:28 AM
Well, I'm sold. Time to start believing in the story about a universe being created in a day, a couple of naked people in a garden, magic fruit, and a talking snake.Yeah, that sounds much more plausible..
Jamie
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 7:13 AM
Yeah, science is funny like that. Using 'Facts' and 'Sources' to verify their claims isn't fair, when all Christianity has is is the word of a book and several thousand paedophiles
leander
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 7:22 AM
I must protest. Although i am not in favor of religion in general, the majority of believers doesn't deserve this. Anyone reading this should see that Murchison is incompetent and not qualified to write about atheism or Christianity. Not a single sentence reveals any honest attempt to understand his fellow man or establish any kind of truth. There are so many christians out there trying to listen to the criticism from us atheists and avoid the typical religious stereotypes... and then this utterly silly person comes along. Murchison would do everyone a favor if he would stop writing.
Derek
Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 7:31 AM
"The Church of Spontaneous Creation"See: Holy Bible, Genesis, Chapter 1, page 1.