The Right Opinion
'Dogs Don't Bark at Parked Cars!'
That's some of the wisdom my Dad taught me. I thought of that saying when I read the attacks on Family Research Council president Tony Perkins. There's a concerted effort to marginalize those who think marriage is important. In doing so, the left wants to shut out millions of Americans at the grassroots. But Mr. Perkins never runs from a fight. He's out in front, leading. And all the dogs are barking at him.
Recently, Mr. Perkins was attacked as a big government backer. Apparently, if you try to defend marriage as the union of one man and one woman, that is supposed to make you an advocate of big government.
Perkins has been fighting for tax cuts and less spending for twenty years. He wants the federal government to stop interfering with the family, stop intruding into small businesses, and stop usurping state and local authority. How does that make him an advocate for big Government?
Some critics think that when you stand up for marriage, that makes you an ally of big government. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The wedding march began through the states in Hawaii. The Aloha State was America's first majority non-white, majority non-Christian state, and Hawaii voters strongly backed a referendum that prevented the state's Supreme Court from overturning marriage.
Conservative leaders have teamed up with the people against liberal powers in state after state. All too often, the top dogs of both parties opposed these people's initiatives, or else hung back.
These state and local groups have rack up popular victories for marriage in 31 states. Wherever the marriage issue appears on the ballot, the people say it loud, say it proud: Marriage is between one man and one woman.
There are no marriage questions on the state ballots this year. Liberal journos are trying to say the movement has lost steam. What? Is that why liberals are afraid to let the issue come to a vote in Vermont, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New York?
Judges of the Iowa Supreme Court are hanging onto their hats and their seats, facing voter wrath because they decided to overturn marriage—and the people's voice be silenced.
Thirty-eight million Americans have voted to protect marriage. Marriage is more popular than any other issue on the conservative agenda. Marriage wins in liberal states, like Hawaii and Wisconsin, in conservative states like Kansas and Utah, and in middle-of-the-road states like Virginia and Ohio.
Marriage is no "wedge" issue. Some jounalists like to call it that, as if it's not important. But Marriage is a bridge issue. Marriage wins among blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and whites.
Marriage appeals to non-college educated as well as to blue collar workers. It's a way of bringing those elusive Reagan Democrats back into the fold.
In California this year, we may see a Republican win the state house and another go to the Senate. But it's been more than twenty years since Republicans carried the Golden State for President. While John McCain was going down to a crushing defeat in California in 2008, Proposition 8, the Marriage Protection Amendment, was cruising to victory.
We have heard a lot about compassionate conservatism. And we've heard accusations that conservatives are "downright mean." Well, defending marriage is the most compassionate thing conservatives can do.
Even some liberals recognize this. Bill Galston once worked for Bill Clinton. He says if a young couple will just finish high school, avoid having children out of wedlock, and marry, the chances are only 4% they will ever live in poverty.
Big government feeds on the breakdown of marriage. Our prisons are filling up with fatherless young men. What Bill Bennett wisely called the Broken Hearth fuels demands for more money for extra helpers in schools, for food stamps, for expanded medical coverage—all these needs are exacerbated by the breakdown of marriage.
Today, tragically, nearly 40% of our children are born out-of-wedlock. And big government consumes nearly 40% of our Gross Domestic Product.
I don't believe the 40/40 link is imaginary?
If you want smaller government, lower taxes, and a return to constitutional principles, the fastest way to do that is to defend marriage, empower the family, and show Americans real compassion.

2 Comments
Merry Colin
Friday, October 22, 2010 at 1:42 PM
I am fed up with arguments on both sides of this issue.On one side:DOMA doesn't "protect" marriage; it defines it.Marriage is a religious sacrament and the state has no business in it. Marriage licenses were created to protect wealth and property through established ascendancy. The state has taken actually been empowered to interfere with the rights to one's own children using this license through divorce courts.For the most part, homosexuals don't have children out of wedlock so that point is wasted here.My marriage can never be threatened by what others do, or what the state may do. My vows were before God and family.On the other side:Marriage will give you no more protection than a civil contract and a healthcare power of attorney. It is no longer 1950 where one "spouse" can be kept from the other.If you want to marry and a church agrees to perform the ceremony, it is none of MY business. You are then wife and wife or husband and husband. God bless you both.Again, this is no longer 1950; I get it---you are homosexual. And again, it is none of MY business. I personally don't care what you do in private anymore than do I care what hertosexuals do in private. I don't want to see a man and woman having virtual "sidewalk sex" anymore than I do two men or two women.Bottom line: Both sides---stop shoving your personal business in my face and then getting angry that I don't pick one side or the other. I choose to MIND MY OWN BUSINESS.P.S. Gubmint doesn't exist to "empower" families. There should be no tax favors given to those who are married, with or without children. We are a national of individuals and our taxes ought to represent that.
sunforester
Friday, October 22, 2010 at 6:28 PM
Dear Merry, You are absolutely right. Just because we are throwing out one set of socialist know-it-alls who want to tell us what to do, does not mean that there is now a big, beautiful vacuum for another set of socialists to come in and throw their weight around.All you wannabe policymakers need to back down and give the rest of us a break from yourselves. Get out of our lives and stay there.