The Right Opinion

Tea Party to the Rescue

By Peggy Noonan · Oct. 23, 2010

Two central facts give shape to the historic 2010 election. The first is not understood by Republicans, and the second not admitted by Democrats.

The first: the tea party is not a “threat” to the Republican Party, the tea party saved the Republican Party. In a broad sense, the tea party rescued it from being the fat, unhappy, querulous creature it had become, a party that didn’t remember anymore why it existed, or what its historical purpose was. The tea party, with its energy and earnestness, restored the GOP to itself.

In a practical sense, the tea party saved the Republican Party in this cycle by not going third-party. It could have. The broadly based, locally autonomous movement seems to have made a rolling decision, group by group, to take part in Republican primaries and back Republican hopefuls. (According to the Center for the Study of the American Electorate, four million more Republicans voted in primaries this year than Democrats, the GOP’s highest such turnout since 1970. I wonder who those people were?)

Because of this, because they did not go third-party, Nov. 2 is not going to be a disaster for the Republicans, but a triumph.

The tea party did something the Republican establishment was incapable of doing: It got the party out from under George W. Bush. The tea party rejected his administration’s spending, overreach and immigration proposals, among other items, and has become only too willing to say so. In doing this, the tea party allowed the Republican establishment itself to get out from under Mr. Bush: “We had to, boss, it was a political necessity!” They released the GOP establishment from its shame cringe.

And they not only freed the Washington establishment, they woke it up. That establishment, composed largely of 50- to 75-year-olds who came to Washington during the Reagan era in a great rush of idealism, in many cases stayed on, as they say, not to do good but to do well. They populated a conservative infrastructure that barely existed when Reagan was coming up: the think tanks and PR groups, the media outlets and governmental organizations. They did not do what conservatives are supposed to do, which is finish their patriotic work and go home, taking the knowledge and sophistication derived from Washington and applying it to local problems. (This accounts in part for the esteem in which former Bush budget chief and current Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels is held. He went home.)

The GOP establishment stayed, and one way or another lived off government, breathed in its ways and came to know—learned all too well!—the limits of what is possible and passable. Part of the social and cultural reality behind the tea party-GOP establishment split has been the sheer fact that tea partiers live in non-D.C. America. The establishment came from America, but hasn’t lived there in a long time.

I know and respect some of the establishmentarians, but after dinner, on the third glass of wine, when they get misty-eyed about Reagan and the old days, they are not, I think, weeping for him and what he did but for themselves and who they were. Back when they were new and believed in something.

Finally, the tea party stiffened the GOP’s spine by forcing it to recognize what it had not actually noticed, that we are a nation in crisis. The tea party famously has no party chiefs and no conventions but it does have a theme—stop the spending, stop the sloth, incompetence and unneeded regulation—and has lent it to the GOP.

Actually, Maureen “Moe” Tucker, former drummer of the Velvet Underground, has done the best job ever of explaining where the tea party stands and why it stands there. She also suggests the breadth and variety of the movement. In an interview this week in St. Louis’s Riverfront Times, Ms. Tucker said she’d never been particularly political but grew alarmed by the direction the country was taking. In the summer of 2009, she went to a tea-party rally in southern Georgia. A chance man-on-the-street interview became a YouTube sensation. No one on the left could believe this intelligent rally-goer was the former drummer of the 1960s breakthrough band; no one on the left understood that an artist could be a tea partier. Because that’s so not cool, and the Velvet Underground was cool.

Ms. Tucker, in the interview, ran through the misconceptions people have about tea partiers: “that they’re all racists, they’re all religious nuts, they’re all uninformed, they’re all stupid, they want no taxes at all and no regulations whatsoever.” These stereotypes, she observed, are encouraged by Democrats to keep their base “on their side.” But she is not a stereotype: “Anyone who thinks I’m crazy about Sarah Palin, Bush, etc., has made quite the presumption. I have voted Democrat all my life, until I started listening to what Obama was promising and started wondering how the hell will this utopian dream be paid for?”

There is also this week a striking essay by Fareed Zakaria, no tea partier he, in Time magazine. He unknowingly touched on part of the reason for the tea party. Mr. Zakaria, born and raised in India, got his first sense of America’s vitality, outsized ways, glamour and crazy high-spiritedness as a young boy in the late 1970s watching bootlegged videotapes of “Dallas.” What a country! His own land, in comparison, seemed sleepy, hidebound. Now when he travels to India, “it’s as if the world has been turned upside down. Indians are brimming with hope and faith in the future. After centuries of stagnation, their economy is on the move, fueling animal spirits and ambition. The whole country feels as if it has been unlocked.” Meanwhile the mood in the U.S. seems glum, dispirited. “The middle class, in particular, feels under assault.” Sixty-three percent of Americans say they do not think they will be able to maintain their current standard of living. “The can-do country is convinced that it can’t.”

All true. And yet. We may be witnessing a new political dynamism. The Tea Party’s rise reflects anything but fatalism, and maybe even a new high-spiritedness. After all, they’re only two years old and they just saved a political party and woke up an elephant.

The second fact of 2010 is understood by Republicans but not admitted by Democrats. It is that this is a fully nationalized election, and at its center it is about one thing: Barack Obama.

It is not, broadly, about the strengths or weaknesses of various local candidates, about constituent services or seniority, although these elements will be at play in some outcomes, Barney Frank’s race likely being one. But it is significant that this year Mr. Frank is in the race of his life, and this week on TV he did not portray the finger-drumming smugness and impatience with your foolishness he usually displays on talk shows. He looked pale and mildly concussed, like someone who just found out that liberals die, too.

This election is about one man, Barack Obama, who fairly or not represents the following: the status quo, Washington, leftism, Nancy Pelosi, Fannie and Freddie, and deficits in trillions, not billions.

Everyone who votes is going to be pretty much voting yay or nay on all of that. And nothing can change that story line now.


James J Rieker said:

The Republican party is very dirty, especially in NYC. many of the new Candiates that are now running are not mainstream dirty republicans; but new people. The Republican party was sleeping at the primary: they were overtaken by Tea party people. These people are clean If they get elected it will be great for the country: if not welcome to France and Greece because that is what we will become.

Saturday, October 23, 2010 at 1:07 AM

Doktor Riktor Von Zhades said:

The message the Tea Party sent to the GOP is quite simple;Lead, follow, or get out of the way. There is a Tea Party rally here today in my town. If you are in the Western KY area, be in Paducah on the riverfront today at 1pm.

Saturday, October 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM

JuliaHope said:

The GOP better get it. I like how Noonan put it, the Tea Party saved the GOP by now going third party "IN THIS CYCLE". Yes indeed. You see, this movement has a lot of work in front of it. Many cycles to come, and if the GOP does not respond to its constituents' new reality, they will be replaced by a new party, the Tea Party. The GOP will become a minority in DC and the country.I'm very excited about 2010, the new life that has been breathed into the Constitution. People need to read and understand it. When the "tenthers" talk about doing away with federal programs and beauracracies, they only mean federal. The various states can do what they will, then the people of the country will vote with their feet. States that do too much will lose people, which equals tax income, and they will be forced to change their ways or wither. The states that do too little will also lose people, only the states that do just right will become Goldilocks and prosper! "Tenthers" are called crazy these days, but the Tenth Amendment was put in there for a reason. The founding fathers knew the government would get out of control eventually, that amendment allowed a constitutional remedy once the people and the states had had enough!I think that time has come, yes?

Saturday, October 23, 2010 at 11:48 AM

Perry said:

Q: What is the remedy for a monopoly when the monopoly is perpetrated by the Federal Government?A: See JuliaHope's posting for a clue.

Saturday, October 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM

GMButler said:

That's where you're wrong Peggy. The TEA Party will eventually replace the Republican Party much in the same way that the Republican Party replaced the Whigs. You're watching history in the making.

Saturday, October 23, 2010 at 10:22 PM

CDHBruce said:

One correction... there has been a statewide Tea Party Convention... in Richmond, Virginia, October 8-9th. Dick Morris, Lou Dobbs, and a number of others spoke. Attendees were not elected or designated representatives, but people who paid their own way to gather with others like themselves... Americans interested in reviving the Constitutional Republic given us by our founders.

Monday, October 25, 2010 at 12:33 PM

Craig from CA said:

I formerly had a "Proud Republican" shirt - nice, classic dark blue polo. I gave it away (Disabled American Vets) when I became too disappointed with the over-reach of government regulations concerning on-line poker instituted by Republicans. I look forward to a revitalized party - and fervently hope we get back to limited government regulatory intervention allowing personal choice.

Monday, October 25, 2010 at 2:59 PM

GemmaVA said:

The Can-Do Country isn't convinced that it can't, only that it can't under the oppressive weight of an ever-increasing and ever more thuggish administrative state. Throw off that parasitic beast and return to rational government, and you'll see the return of our natural dynamism in spades.The GOP is on probation at best, and they will be watched like hawks during this next session of Congress. Those who aren't willing to be knights in defense of our liberty will be given their pink slip at the next applicable election. The GOP has long since forfeited its right to leadership: the only choices now left to it are follow the lead of the Tea Parties or get out of the way.

Monday, October 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM