The Right Opinion
The Media on Wisconsin? A Bad Joke
The battle in Madison, Wis., between new Gov. Scott Walker and the public-sector union hacks offers an amazing study in journalistic double standards. The same national media that have spent the last two years drawing devil's horns and Klan hoods on the tea party protesters have switched sides with lightning speed. In the Wisconsin protesters, they find sweetness and light, "hope and change."
From her Sunday soapbox, ABC host Christiane Amanpour snobbishly deplored the tea party as not conservative but as "extreme" last fall. In a special "town hall" episode of her show on the ground zero mosque debate, she accused an incredulous Gary Bauer of encouraging vandalism at a Tennessee mosque because somehow Christian rhetoric is offensive. The accusation itself was offensive because it was entirely baseless.
Yet in Wisconsin, the exact opposite happened. Amanpour took the extreme, vicious and wholly offensive signs comparing Gov. Walker to Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak and embraced them as geopolitically accurate: "People power making history: A revolt in the Midwest and a revolution sweeping across the Middle East." She touted how "populist frustration is boiling over this week."
This is politically perverse. Last November, Wisconsin registered one of the most dramatic rejections of the Democrats in the entire country. Sen. Russ Feingold, once considered a shoo-in for re-election, was not only defeated; he was crushed by 100,000 votes. Polls convinced Democrat Gov. Jim Doyle to avoid running for re-election, paving the way for Walker. And the GOP swept into both houses, defeating both state Senate Majority Leader Russ Decker and Assembly Speaker Mike Sheridan at the polls. The Republican Party was so successful that Wisconsin GOP leader Reince Priebus was elected as the national party chairman.
What incredible gall for the national media to try to transform Wisconsin from conservative juggernaut to Egyptian dictatorship in a heartbeat. Their political imagination (or delusion) is just staggering, completely ignoring the election returns. Liberals were crushed by the voters, and now they dare to put themselves in the "people power" category? This is reality turned upside down.
But it isn't just electoral reality that's been mangled. Where, oh where, are the media lectures on civility now? The same media that roundly and repeatedly condemned Sarah Palin for daring to put cross hairs on a congressional district -- not on congressional faces, but on counties -- now have absolutely nothing to say as protester signs put Gov. Walker's face in cross hairs with the words: "Don't Retreat, Reload: Repeal Walker." Another held a sign saying, "Political Death to Tyrants."
The same media that went into desk-pounding rage about LaRouche-wacko signs putting a Hitler moustache on Obama calmly refused to discuss signs where Gov. Walker was compared to Mubarak and Adolf Hitler. He was "Scott Stalin" and "Midwest Mussolini." Signs accused Walker of "rape," called him a profanity describing incest, and said he "terrorizes families." Any incivility there?
In a devastating video, the Wisconsin Republican Party put some of these images next to arrogant leftists insisting only conservatives do this kind of thing. "Violent political rhetoric and the threat of political violence comes almost exclusively from the right," declared Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson on MSNBC. "Left-wingers don't talk that way," boasted Bill Maher to Jay Leno.
This was an ideal opportunity for the news media to deplore the insults, but the "civility police" were on vacation. They not only failed, but in their failure they proved they only pretend to care about civility to protect the public image of their friends.
Not every liberal is blind to this. Washington Post editorialist Charles Lane disagreed with his colleague Eugene Robinson: "This is hypocrisy on an epic scale. I can't think of a more overwhelming refutation of the claim that incivility is the unique province of the American right." This was only online, not in the paper. On Time's "Swampland" blog, columnist Joe Klein denounced the "disgusting mimicry of some tea party members' inflammatory linkage between Obama and the evil dictators of history." But these men were a tiny sliver of dissent from the media's "pro-union" party line.
It is weeks like this where the liberal media fail to understand what a bad joke they've become. Their offerings are not "news," but crude spin and blatant propaganda.
There's only one comfort. At least, we've been spared from the ugly sight of how aggressively Keith Olbermann might have embodied that "hypocrisy on an epic scale." On the other hand, it appears that Christiane Amanpour aspires to that mantle and is quickly earning Mr. Olbermann's level of credibility.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

14 Comments
Howard Last
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 12:20 AM
Why is anyone surprised at what the Antiamerican Broadcasting Corporation would say or interested at all?
Brian
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 7:25 AM
Are we really surprised? Control of the media are goals 20 and 21 of the communists. Don't believe me? Read it here:http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htmBTW, Obama gave them goal #2 and is working on goal #3.
Bruce
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 7:56 AM
Well. Today's anti-USAToday, lapdog mouthpiece for its special interest owners, says 61% of Americans strongly oppose restraining bargaining rights for public employees. There you have it, people. We have become a COMMUNIST nation, ruled by labor unions including those who WORK FOR US! The graft, corruption, and now the extortion of our paychecks out of our hands to fund these leeches has never been more apparent. Are you Americans or are you victims? Choose now. Chicago just made theirs. IT'S PAST TIME TO TAKE OUT THE TRASH.
kevin
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 10:17 AM
Bruce - have to look at that poll source - left leaning.The more respectable poll, Rasmussen, has the public behind the Wisconsin Gov by a large margin.
p3orion
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 11:51 AM
Brian-Thanks for the link to the "Communist Goals." In addition to goals #20 and 21 (control of the news and entertainment media) having been fulfilled, I'd say that Obama's election shows that they've got #15 (control of a major American political party) pretty well in hand, too.
Caseace
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 1:40 PM
If Keith Olbermann makes a comment ans nobody is listening, does he make a sound?
Dennis
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 1:50 PM
The "Communist Goals" aren't anything an actual Communist ever wrote, but they are taken from "The Naked Communist", a 1958 book by Cleon Skousen. He was a conservative Morman and John Birch Society member.
Billy
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 1:58 PM
Just wondering where the deserting democratic congressmen from WI and IN are getting the money to stay in posh IL hotels/resorts? Are they dipping into campaign funds, taking contributions from their supporters, or are the unions just paying for them outright?
Marcus
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 2:36 PM
"journalism" was considered one of those squishy degrees that the less mentally endowed would pursue when I was in college. Along with english, history, philosophy and such. these graduates essentially should serve as our tribe's chroniclers if you will, but it seems that as of late, most of them can't even do that well.i've heard it said if you can't do, teach. well i suppose if you can't do either of those you can write "news" articles or work for NPR.
Candyman
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM
Isn't there anything that can be done to overcome the leftwing bias of the media. They are responsible for Obama, the unions and very nearly everything else that has gone wrong with the American Constitution.
Howard Last
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM
Candyman, nothing has gone wrong with the Constitution, the bastards (I should not insult bastards) don't follow it. They despise the Constitution.
Richard Ryan
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 5:10 PM
Just heard today that Obama has said he will no longer defend the Defense of Marriage act because "He" has decided it is unconstitutional.I was under the impression that it was up the courts to decide whether a law was constitutional.Of course, that`s something I learned way back when schools still taught facts rather than politically correct garbage.Richard RyanLamar,Missouri (Birthplace of Harry S Truman)
Jane
Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 8:04 PM
To Richard Ryan Actually, the Founding Fathers considered that it was the duty of people in all three branches of government (Legislative, executive and judiciary) to take whatever they were considering to do and measure it against the Constitution. As I read the enumerated powers section (Art I, Sec 8) the federal government does not have the authority to deal with marriage - this is a matter for the states (10th Amendment). However, this is a double-edged sword, since by the same reasoning, neither the Congress, the President, nor the Supreme Court has the Constitutional authority to impose gay marriage on all the states.
Abu Nudnik
Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 1:18 PM
You've just caught up to Amanpour's self-righteous garbage now?BTW: The popular press arose at exactly the same time as political parties: it is no coincidence. Newspapers were supposed to advertise the ideas of the parties. Only recently has "objective journalism" come to be seen as an ideal - even an ethical mandate. Why else do so-called liberals stand outside Fox yelling "Shut up Fox!" like a bunch of children? The terms "shut up" are, of course, very "liberal" and very mature. They can't even stand to hear an opposing point of view!It affirms my conviction that there are only two things that can be said about liberal Democrats that are demonstrably true: they are neither liberal nor are they democrats. The flight of the Wisconsin lawmakers? I rest my case.