The Right Opinion
A Price on Our Heads
Back in the American Wild West, federal and state governments often put a price on the heads of infamous outlaws like Billy the Kid, Jesse James, Sam Bass, Belle Star and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.
Today, our government is not so selective. It's seeking to put a price on the head of every American. Not because they've robbed a train, but for a different reason that could lead to a very bad end.
A recent New York Times story summarizes how various government agencies have come up with formulas for determining how much we are worth. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Times notes, has set the value of a human life at $9.1 million, reaching this determination while proposing tighter restrictions on air pollution. During the Bush administration, EPA calculated our value at $6.8 million. Was the difference in price caused by inflation? The EPA didn't say.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) arrived at its own figure for the value of an American life. The FDA, writes the Times, "declared that life was worth $7.9 million last year, up from $5 million in 2008, in proposing warning labels on cigarette packages featuring images of cancer victims."
The Transportation Department -- yes, Transportation -- put our worth at $6 million "to justify recent decisions to impose regulations that the Bush administration had rejected as too expensive, like requiring stronger roofs on cars," according to the Times.
It's nice to know that our government values its citizens beyond what it can extract in taxes. But given the Obama administration's likely pursuit of health care rationing (Dr. Donald Berwick, a wealth redistributionist who heads the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is a proponent of rationed care) it is easy to forecast where this could lead should human life be regarded as having only that value placed upon it by government, or an agent of the state.
The beauty of our form of government is that it begins, not with government, but with us: "We the People." In our Declaration of Independence from Britain, there is a clause that sets us apart from virtually all other nations. Instead of receiving our basic rights, such as the right to life, from a king or despot -- as was the case in older cultures and too many modern ones -- America's Founders saw basic rights emanating from "our Creator" and thus, outside the reach of government and bureaucratic tampering.
Where could a formula for a governmental valuation of human life lead? If government gets to determine our worth, it could lead to government determining when in its judgment we are worthless. It could lead to government deciding that when we are costing the state more than we are paying in taxes, we might be seen as a bottle, package or can, whose "sell by" date has expired. And that would mean the government could regard us as disposable and allow -- or force us -- to "expire."
Too extreme? "It couldn't happen here," you say? All great horrors begin at the extremes and work their way into the mainstream because of moral weakness or exhaustion, or self-regard, or the rejection of (or ambivalence about) certain fundamental truths. Such neglectfulness paves the way for the great inhumanities, which today are studied in schools. They wonder, "how it could have happened" and "why didn't anyone see this coming?"
How and why, indeed? Consider yourself warned.
(c) 2011 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

15 Comments
Tom
Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 9:01 AM
We all are coming rapidly to the realization of exactly what our lives are worth in the new American socialist gulag into which our own government has sold us out to the Chinese communist owners and masters. Makes the antebellum south start to look like a Sunday afternoon picnic.
David S.
Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 10:10 AM
As a being made in the image of a Living God and possessing an eternal soul, any human being is of inestimable value. There was only one price tag ever given by God on a human: His only begotten Son.
Warren W.
Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 6:32 PM
What in the world is any agency of the US Government doing creating a formula to set a "value" on a human life in the first place?? Where in the Constitution do they get the authority to......wait, what am I thinking?? The "Constitution"?? As Nancy Pelosi said recently "Are you serious"?? when asked where in the Constitution the government has the authority to force it's citizens to purchase health insurance. What she was really saying is that the Constitution has no meaning to her and the government has unlimited authority to do literally ANYTHING it wants. Sadly I don't see a whole heck of a lot of action from Republicans to correct the situation. Thanks for a great article Cal. Spot on.
Richard Ryan
Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 6:41 PM
An excellent piece Mr. Thomas, and exactly along the line I have been preaching for some time.The easiest way to solve the SS and Medicare mess is to kill off as many seniors as possible,ergo,Obomas death panel.A Christian president would not even entertain that idea.However; no matter how much Oboma may claim to be a Christian,his saying so does not necessarily make it so.It`s hard to know for sure what evil lurks in the hearts of men; to quote an old radio show intro.Richard RyanLamar,Missouri (Birthplace of Harry S Truman)
Edwin
Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 8:56 PM
Warren - Republicans? Really? You jest! Some of us swore to uphold and defend the Constitution. That oath had no limit or expiration date. And I assure you we are god-damn good and ready to do just that no matter the price. Like Patton, I say: "I would be happy to lead you poor SOBs into battle, any time, any place". And under any conditions, for the Republic. And we will take NO prisoners.
Odin
Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 11:56 PM
America's Founders saw basic rights emanating from "our Creator" and thus, outside the reach of government and bureaucratic tampering.No. Why is this fool misinforming people about natural rights? How can he not know better? What a pitiful example of the failure of America's educational system.
Odin
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 12:45 AM
"merica's Founders saw basic rights emanating from "our Creator" and thus, outside the reach of government and bureaucratic tampering."Why is this ignoramus misinforming people about the founders' views on natural rights and government? And what does it say about the level of education on this site that so many of you can read crap like Cal's and not immediately recognize it as crap? What the hell ever happened to bright educated conservatives? Was Buckley the last of a dying breed?
TruthInAction
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 6:11 AM
From purely analytical viewpoint, and as of a few minutes ago per the National Debt Clock, every US Citizen owes $179,403.00 for ALL debt in the USA; and Social Security, Medicare, and the Prescription Drug Program gives every US Citizen a portion of these “unfunded liabilities” at $362,512.00 per US Citizen. This totals at $541,915.00 for every man, woman, and child in the US.The number of taxpayers in the US is just over one third of the amount of US Citizens, so each taxpayer owes $1,016,275.92. A 30 year “mortgage” at 6% for this amount means a person pays a total of $2,540,689.80 to “own” their country, again. Oh, by the way, don’t forget that “we” and our “employers” paid into the Social Security “Trust” Fund and the “gummint” invested in US Securities, as my Liberal friends remind, “why that’s the safest investment ‘they’ could have made with ‘our’ money”, which “we” get to pay back under this “scheme”. Now there’s some clear thinking!No wonder “they” come up with such high numbers for a person. Just think of the total amount of property taxes, sales taxes, gasoline taxes, telephone taxes, excise taxes, driver license fees, hunting licenses, luxury taxes, state income tax, local income tax, healthcare fees, etc. that “we” pay, and this happens while “we” (at least some of us) purchase goods and services for our existence and pleasure."A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.” Gerald Ford, Presidential address to a joint session of Congress, 12 August 1974
jt
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 1:29 PM
Did yall see the inquiry from Carroll Wilson of the Temple Daily Telegram pointing out that several paragraphs of this piece are substantially the same as in a recent piece in the New York Times?
Morris21654
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 4:47 PM
How anyone can plagiarize in today's Internet environment is beyond me. As a professional writer/editor, I have to check material from others all the time, and it is so easy to catch the plagiarists. Reviewing some of Cal Thomas' recent columns just now, it is clear that he skates along the edge of writing ethics. For example, his column "Coolidge-Taylor-Walker" from 2/22/2011 (see http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/thomas022211.php3) has at least some of its source material at AmSpecBlog, part of The American Spectator, at http://spectator.org/blog/2009/09/09/there-is-no-right-to-strike-ag. Just a little note of attribution or source would make it clear where he got his information.Whatever happened to the days whem political commentators got fresh information from interviewing prominent public figures or their enemies? That was good political writing.
Moses
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 5:23 PM
Thou shall not steal.
Dick Hunter
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 5:27 PM
I sure did, jt. Ol' Cal is a plagiarist!
pete
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 10:24 PM
And the only protected ones would be the those in prison, because we all know to take their lives would be "cruel and unusual punishment."
pete
Friday, February 25, 2011 at 10:30 PM
"Taking from only one source is plagiarism.Taking from many sources is research."
JJ
Sunday, February 27, 2011 at 2:28 PM
Not to get sidetracked on the "who borrowed what words" arguement - What if we applied the "woth" of a human life as determined by the above mentioned federal agencies to the penal system? What are you going to do when you find out that the cost of life in prison is greater than the "worth" of the human life? Does this mean the evaluation of a human life suddenly becomes infinite only when you are talkng about "real" people with "real" faces who are outside of their mothers' womb? Amazing double standard - it is almost as if the potential politics of the person is of more value to a liberal than anything else - that is why their abortion stance is so clear - this person will have no political impact for at least 18 years - so why be concerned about them. The cannot vote for me!