Options
Bonfire of the Insanities
· Thursday, September 9, 2010
In response to Gen David Petraeus' denunciation of Florida pastor Terry Jones' right to engage in a symbolic protest of the 9/11 attacks by burning copies of the Quran this Sept. 11, President Obama said: "Let me be clear: As a citizen, and as president, I believe that members of the Dove World Outreach Center have the same right to freedom of speech and religion as anyone else in this country."
Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida lauded Obama's remarks, saying America is "a place where you're supposed to be able to practice your religion without the government telling you you can't."
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg called Obama's words a "clarion defense of the freedom of religion" -- and also claimed that he had recently run into a filthy jihadist who actually supported the Quran-burning!
Keith Olbermann read the poem "First they came ..." on air in defense of the Quran-burners, nearly bringing himself to tears at his own profundity.
No wait, my mistake. This is what liberals said about the ground zero mosque only five minutes ago when they were posing as First Amendment absolutists. Suddenly, they've developed amnesia when it comes to the free-speech right to burn a Quran.
Weirdly, conservatives who opposed building the mosque at ground zero are also against the Quran burning. (Except in my case. It turns out I'm for it, but mostly because burning Qurans will contribute to global warming.)
Liberals couldn't care less about the First Amendment. To the contrary, censoring speech and religion is the left's specialty! (Any religion other than Islam.)
They promote speech codes, hate crimes, free speech zones (known as "America" off college campuses), and go around the country yanking every reference to God from the public square via endless lawsuits by the ACLU.
Whenever you see a liberal choking up over our precious constitutional rights, you can be sure we're talking about the rights of Muslims at ground zero, "God Hates Fags" funeral protesters, strippers, The New York Times publishing classified documents, pornographers, child molesters, murderers, traitors, saboteurs, terrorists, flag-burners (but not Quran-burners!) or women living on National Endowment of the Arts grants by stuffing yams into their orifices on stage.
Speaking of lying dwarfs, last week on "The Daily Show" Bloomberg claimed he was having a hamburger with his "girlfriend" when a man came up to him and said of the ground zero mosque: "I just got back from two tours fighting overseas for America. This is what we were all fighting for. You go and keep at it."
We're fighting for the right of Muslims to build mosques at ground zero? I thought we were trying to keep Muslims AWAY from our skyscrapers. (What an embarrassing misunderstanding.) PLEASE PULL THE TROOPS OUT IMMEDIATELY.
But back to the main issue: Was Bloomberg having a $150 Burger Double Truffle at DB Bistro Moderne or a more sensible $30 burger at the 21 Club when he bumped into his imaginary veteran? With the pint-sized mayor shrieking at the sight of a saltshaker, I assume he wasn't having a Hardee's No. 4 Combo Meal.
Adding an element of realism to his little vignette, Bloomberg said: "I got a hamburger and a pickle and a potato chip or something."
A potato chip? Translation: "I don't know what I was eating, because I'm making this whole story up -- I wouldn't be caught dead eating 'a potato chip' or any other picaresque garnish favored by the peasants." At least Bloomberg didn't claim the man who walked up to him took credit for setting the Times Square bomb because he was a tea partier upset about ObamaCare -- as Sherlock Bloomberg had so presciently speculated at the time.
Gen. Petraeus objected to the Quran-burning protest on the grounds that it could be used by radical jihadists to recruit Muslims to attack Americans.
This is what liberals say whenever we do anything displeasing to the enemy -- invade Iraq, hold captured terrorists in Guantanamo, interrogate captured jihadists or publish Muhammad cartoons. Is there a website somewhere listing everything that encourages terrorist recruiting?
If the general's main objective is to hamper jihadist recruiting, may I respectfully suggest unconditional surrender? Because on his theory, you know what would really kill the terrorists' recruiting ability? If we adopted Sharia law!
But wait -- weren't we assured by Fire Island's head of national security, Andrew Sullivan, that if America elected a "brown-skinned man whose father was an African, who grew up in Indonesia and Hawaii, who attended a majority-Muslim school as a boy," the terrorists would look like a bunch of lunkheads and be unable to recruit?
It didn't work out that way. There have been more terrorist attacks on U.S. soil by these allegedly calmed Muslims in Obama's first 18 months in office than in the six years under Bush after he invaded Iraq.
Also, as I recall, there was no Guantanamo, no Afghanistan war and no Iraq war on Sept. 10, 2001. And yet, somehow, Osama bin Ladin had no trouble recruiting back then. Can we retire the "it will help them recruit" argument yet?
The reason not to burn Qurans is that it's unkind -- not to jihadists, but to Muslims who mean us no harm. The same goes for building a mosque at ground zero -- in both cases, it's not a question of anyone's "rights," it's just a nasty thing to do.
COPYRIGHT 2010 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Heritage Foundation President Dr. Edwin Feulner, Jr.: "The best Websites wield remarkable influence in the marketplace of ideas. The Patriot Post is a 'must read' for informed conservatives." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Arnold Ahlert: CPAC Braces for Union & Occupier Chaos
- Michael Reagan: A Little More Heat
- George Will: GOP's Murky Rhetoric on National Defense
- Larry Elder: Aren't Republicans Supposed to Be Colorblind?
- Thomas Sowell: The Anti-Romney Vote
- Ann Coulter: Plutocrat Dems Attack Romney as 'Richie Rich'
- Burt Prelutsky: Was Idi Amin Smarter Than Martha Stewart?
- L. Brent Bozell: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: The Delousing of a Movement
- Jonah Goldberg: Liberals are the True Aggressors in Culture Wars
- Cal Thomas: Fudging the Numbers
- Michael Barone: GOP Must Convince Young People It's the Party of Options
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!






















MichaelSSEC
Exceptionally well said, Ms. Coulter. Love how the Left always runs screaming to the First Amendment whenever they want to protect something grotesque, but when a thing offends their delicate little girly sensibilities, suddenly free speech is a highly regulated, subjective and overrated thing.
I don't think the pastor ought to be roasting marshmallows over a stack of Korans either, but as long as the Left considers burning an American flag a lovely expression of free speech, I'll just have to contain my disdain for the pastor's chosen expression. How do you spell "Liberal"? H-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 1:38:54 AM
Jodi
Amen, amen, and AMEN. "News" isn't "made" when people are interested in working together and doing things that will calm the storm rather than add to it. Thus, the news gobbles up Cordoba House and Qu'ran burning... giving the foolish and the disturbed more credibility than they should ever have and a platform from which to speak that they should definitely be denied. One tiny church in FL does something truly moronic and the entire nation knows about it. Sad.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 8:20:36 AM
Wally
The imam of NY is about to make public his funding sources for the 9/11 Cordoba monument, or so he says. Given that we tax-payers were forced by the State department to pay for his trip abroad to promote it, what do you bet our own government is footing a large portion of the bill to construct it? And just how much of bloomberg's and obamanation's resources have already been squandered in defense of this insult to those who lost their lives on 9/11/2001?
Posted September 9, 2010 at 9:16:33 AM
Frank
We recognize that not all muslims are radicals. And that not all of them want to turn every nation – including the USA - into a paradise like Afghanistan.
But we are having a difficult time hearing that message when mullah omar says: “The victory our Islamic nation over the invading infidels is now imminent and the driving force behind this is the belief in the help of Allah and unity among ourselves. In the time to come, we will try to establish an Islamic, independent, perfect, and strong system.”
Yeah. Just like the one that stood on 9/10/2001.
Notice he said “Islamic nation”, not Afghanistan. And notice he said through unity, there and no doubt world-wide. And his “independent, perfect, and strong system” sounds exactly like a progressives’ world-view of a Utopian political tyranny, not a religion.
So, if most muslims choose not to practice what their religious leaders preach, just like the obamanation really doesn’t act out what Rev. Wright taught him, that’s exactly the kind of religious freedom we all can live with.
The alternative is obvious.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 9:34:32 AM
Hard Thought
Not all Muslims are terrorists.
But all terrorists since the Second World War, with the exception of Timothy McVeigh are Muslims.
Both the burning of the Koran and the Cordoba mission are allowed by the Constitution. Both are deplorable.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 9:59:02 AM
Nicole
"Weirdly, conservatives who opposed building the mosque at ground zero are also against the Quran burning"
I'm so tired of people speaking in absolutes on both sides of the fence. I was just over at Sarah Palins Facebook page where her supporters are discussing whether or not they are for or against the Quran burning. It's very obvious that many of them are for it and many of them are against. Many of these people are against the mosque and FOR burning the Quran.
This goes the same for liberals. To act like all liberals agree is just as ridiculous. Some liberals who support the mosque are against burning the Quran. However, I've read them saying the same things conservatives have been saying about the mosque "it's their right to do it, but we'd prefer if they don't". That's a far cry from revoking people's freedom of speech rights.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 11:55:12 AM
GM Roper
Ms. Coulter, though we view many things through different lenses, this post is spot on! An example of the left's intransigence and hypocrisy can be found at Dissonance
Posted September 9, 2010 at 12:09:06 PM
Johny
A well thought out diatribe. I enjoy readijng Coulters incisive artcles. Pity the left wing inteligentia of Ottawa Kanada would not let her speak. We need more Ann Coulters. Rage on, continue to tell it like it is
Posted September 9, 2010 at 12:16:23 PM
ME
Do you realize that ANYONE who has ever eaten pork in any form is considered an infidel and can be murdered without fault under Sharia law?
Posted September 9, 2010 at 12:45:56 PM
ME again
The way to stop the mosque is to defile the soil now with pigs, pig excrement and pig blood. For some reason, the blood and ashes of pig-eating patriots who were incinerated on 9/11 makes the site attractive, but living pigs are a defilement. Go figure.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 12:50:35 PM
Onesimos
If they wrapped the Qurans in American flags before burning, would that make it acceptable to our "superiors" on the left?
I personally think, if you are going to burn something, you should cook something on the fire.
Bacon is pretty tasty.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 12:55:53 PM
Todd
Thanks a lot ME, now I'm hungry and want a BLT for lunch!
Posted September 9, 2010 at 1:03:32 PM
bobg
In as much as sharia law is totally in conflict to the constitution, Anyone who gets citizenship by swearing to uphold the constitution to get citizenship, and then expresses a desire to impose it on us , should be immediately deported or sent to guantanimo.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 1:04:06 PM
WLB
I suspect Ms. Coulter has remarked on this before, but it bears repeating: isn't it remarkable that so many members of the religion of peace typically react to any perceived slight by threatening to kill or maim not just the person committing the slight, but other innocent people they associate with him/her?
Posted September 9, 2010 at 1:12:51 PM
MAB
The reason not to burn Qurans is that it's unkind -- not to jihadists, but to Muslims who mean us no harm. The same goes for building a mosque at ground zero -- in both cases, it's not a question of anyone's "rights," it's just a nasty thing to do.
exactly right! someone needs to explain to this "pastor" that to be a Christian means to be Christ like. and this is NOT what Jesus would do.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 1:29:45 PM
Heidi
Ann Coulter hits the nail precisely on the head...Again!
Posted September 9, 2010 at 1:56:08 PM
Mary Alexander
I'd like to inquire of the Florida pastor the biblical basis for his threat to burn the Quaran. Because his calling is to proclaim the good news of the gospel that "God so loved the world. . .", how is his planned book-burning in accord with his ministry?
Posted September 9, 2010 at 2:16:20 PM
Arnold
Mary - while I can't speak at all for the pastor, maybe his inclination has something to do with the book being previously called by some "the Satanic Verses".
Posted September 9, 2010 at 2:21:15 PM
Mark
Very well said, Anne! I, however support the burning of the Quran, even as the people of Ephesus burned their magic books when they accepted the Gospel.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 2:29:33 PM
Marc
burning koran: stupid, mindless act
koran: stupid, mindless book
both protected by the First Amendment
intelligent, well-presented comments by Ms. Coulter
Posted September 9, 2010 at 3:09:06 PM
Mimi
My biggest objection -- nastiness not withstanding -- to this misbegotten Koran burning event is, that if we accept and condone it rather than condemn it loudly, when the Muslims gather together a collection of Judeo-Christian Bibles to burn, we will have no recourse without sounding like a bunch of simple-minded hypocrites. What's sauce for the goose and all that, don't you know. This is surely not what Jesus would have done.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 3:55:03 PM
Fred
Mimi - when Jesus comes back and Judgment Day arrives, he's going to burn a whole lot more than a bunch of books.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 4:02:25 PM
karl anglin
Never believe anything in politics
until it has been officially denied.
------Otto von Bismark (1815-1898)
Posted September 9, 2010 at 6:22:04 PM
Ol'Joe
Ann's intelligent article, as usual, is dead on. As to the issue of the burning of the Qurans, it would have been insignificant if not for the hyper-stupidity of the MSM. If terrorists should kill any American because of it, they will have much more blood on their hands than minister Jones.
Posted September 9, 2010 at 10:20:42 PM
Jim Rodgers
Since you'll need to purchase the satanic verses in order to burn them, seems like a waste of hard earned money. On the other hand, with all the adherents to the religion of peace threatening violence should this occur, I've decided it may not be such a bad idea.
Bullies. Hate 'em. Its always the same. Do something offensive to the cowardly jihadists and they want to kill, burn, and destroy. Then the courageous lefties decide that we need to bravely appease the idiots.
Gonna be a cold winter. How many of those stinking books in a cord?
Posted September 9, 2010 at 11:52:03 PM
tomovich
Great column Ann, one of your better ones. Well said. Hopefully PC-ism may decline a tad after November. Then again maybe not...............
Posted September 10, 2010 at 1:09:40 PM
Howard Last
One thing not mentioned was the supposed flushing of the Quran down a toilet in Guantanamo several years ago. The toilet was obviously not a low flow type that meets EPA requirements. How come we haven't had the enviro nuts going crazy over this? Maybe we should flush the liberals instead.
Posted September 10, 2010 at 2:11:28 PM
Howard Last
How come Meca and Medina are not glowing in the dark. Does anyone remember when we made two Jap (I am not PC) cities glow in the dark. It ended the war. And the Japs believed the emperor was a god just like the Muslims believe about the child molester.
Posted September 10, 2010 at 2:18:20 PM
Howard Last
How come Meca and Medina are not glowing in the dark. Does anyone remember when we made two Jap (I am not PC) cities glow in the dark. It ended the war. And the Japs believed the emperor was a god just like the Muslims believe about the child molester.
Posted September 10, 2010 at 2:52:41 PM
BofromTexas
Excuse me folks. Seems a bit hypocritical for any U.S. citizen to object to the burning of Korans when our 1st Amendment protects that very act. Are you a Constitutionalist....or a Democrat? Think about it if you can get a few IQ points working together on the issue. You should conclude, "It is protected speech, as is burning the U.S. flag, draft cards, Holy Bible, etc." The alleged fact that some Muslims will get upset is irrelevant, and your individual speech-repressive thought process is extremely dangerous to our collective right of individual free speech. You may be charitable and kind and considerate, but that does not alter my right of free speech. Do I think burning Korans is constructive? That, too, is irrelevant. Do I think it is neighborly? Irrelevant. Do I think it will cause harm to our soldiers abroad? Not really, they have good weapons and night sights, and also irrelevant. Do you quaking so-called conservatives get the picture? If not, go re-register as a Democrat. By the way, there is no difference under the law between burning a Koran and writing a government-critical guest editorial for the local newspaper. Think about it. Real hard if you have to.
Posted September 10, 2010 at 8:04:43 PM
Bruce R Pierce
Thank You Bo, I had a GREAT Laugh. Being Retired from the ARMY i was thinking along the same lines. I'm in Combat my life is already in danger, but the other side needs to remember, Combat is the ultimate "two-way" rifle range and my Country supplies me with the BEST weapons and training in the WORLD. Every Infantryman knows the revised last sentence to "Yea though I walk through the Vally of Death I will fear NO evil for....."
Posted September 10, 2010 at 8:31:03 PM
Stoney
Ann, you are amazingly gifted as a writer and thinker (nice combination) and you are beautiful. Marry me!
Posted September 13, 2010 at 1:13:28 AM
Carol
I enjoy your columns. However, I do not believe that there are any Muslims who "mean us no harm." It is what scares me the most. I'm not promoting hatred or harm or harassment of them...just awareness and caution. Muslims practice taqiyya. (See Koran 9:29) They are required by their religion to present a friendly face to their enemies, but to keep hatred in their hearts for them. 1,000 mosques? That equals to 1,000 Trojan horses.
Posted September 14, 2010 at 2:54:05 PM
BT
To Mr Bloomburg - from my Jewish granny in New York;
Mistah Mayuh Bloomboig-
Are you meshugenah? T'ink abouddit boychik - this imam is best friends wid de guys who do mohel impressions on people...only they staht at youah neck! Oy. Youah Mama must be ashamed...
Honest quote.
Posted October 6, 2010 at 3:12:15 PM