Options
Komen Caves: An Object Lesson for All of Us
· Monday, February 6, 2012
Komen for the Cure's stunning reversal to fund Planned Parenthood after all, has an important lesson for us all.
No doubt you've been watching the unfolding drama of the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation's decision to de-fund Planned Parenthood -- and then its stunning reversal.
What you saw last week was a concerted, intentional effort by an ideological minority -- the radical pro-abortion forces -- not just to make their case in public, but to destroy the opposition. Using incendiary language, accusing Komen of endangering the lives of women, they made no pretense to pursue civil discourse.
And it's a tragedy that Komen for the Cure caved. Because all of the all of the rational arguments were on their side.
First of all, Planned Parenthood does not perform mammograms, its doctors simply provide breast cancer referrals. No wonder Komen for the Cure figured its money could be better spent on organizations that provide direct treatment.
And of course there's the uncomfortable link between breast cancer and abortion. A 2009 study by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center showed "a statistically significant 40% increased risk [of breast cancer] for women who have abortions."
Second, Komen's stated policy was not to contribute to organizations under investigation. Well, Planned Parenthood is under Congressional investigation for potentially misusing federal funds -- funds that by law may not be used for abortions. In 2010, the organization received fully 46 percent of its funding -- 487 million dollars -- from government grants.
Yet according to Planned Parenthood's latest annual report, the organization and its many affiliates performed more than 329,000 abortions in 2010 -- or a full 91 percent of services rendered to pregnant women.
It sure sounds to me that they're flaunting the law.
Finally, this never was about the money. Komen's grant was a drop in Planned Parenthood's bucket. As Tim Stanley of the UK Telegraph pointed out, Komen for the Cure's annual grant made up a mere .058 percent of Planned Parenthood's budget!
So what is this all about? Look friends, Komen is the kind of respectable and mainstream partner that Planned Parenthood desperately needs to continue its charade that it is all about "women's health." And it and its friends will bully and shout down anybody who dares to disagree with them.
What happened to Komen is a perfect example of the despotism of the modern left. Disagree with them, they vilify you and seek to intimidate you into silence. Tragically, Komen caved.
As I've been saying on BreakPoint for the last three or four months, we must break the spiral of silence. That's why it is so important to speak out, even now. Let Komen know that you appreciated what they did to de-fund Planned Parenthood -- come to BreakPoint.org and we'll link you to their website -- and that you are horrified that they didn't have the courage to stick to their convictions.
Here is the lesson for us in all of this: We must have the courage of our convictions. Remember, courage is the first of the cardinal virtues, the virtue on which all others depend. We must never cave when it comes to defending the Truth, no matter what comes our way.
Just remember, we have no choice but to stand for what is true and just and to oppose evil no matter what the cost.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Acton Institute Senior Fellow, Marvin Olasky: "Liberals say and do so many nutty things. The Patriot puts them all in a nutshell--easy to crack and fun to read." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























p3orion
Chuck, Chuck, Chuck...
Great column, but you diminish your own intellectual credibility by saying an organization is "flaunting the law" when you obviously mean the opposite: "FLOUTing the law."
I'm not normally one to nit-pick on grammar and such, but come on, now!
Posted February 6, 2012 at 4:10:14 PM
thomas
Komen does NOT fight cancer. All it does is raise money, take a whopping 87% cut for itself, and pass what little is left on to others. It's more a right wing money fraud that has been ripping off donors across the political spectrum for a decade.
Posted February 6, 2012 at 5:10:47 PM
mmccrindle
It's a shame that many will now stop giving to Koman.
But that will happen.
Posted February 6, 2012 at 6:38:36 PM
Jeremy
So, mmccrindle, why is it a shame? I would never have given a dime to Komen if I'd known that they contributed to PP. Who'd have thought? Anyways, I'm glad that I now know.
Posted February 6, 2012 at 8:57:07 PM
Capt_Call
Sorry, p3orion, Chuck's use of flaunt is correct. Look it up at Dictionary.com:
"The use of flaunt to mean “to ignore or treat with disdain” ( He flaunts community standards with his behavior ) is strongly objected to by many usage guides, which insist that only flout can properly express this meaning. From its earliest appearance in English in the 16th century, flaunt has had the meanings “to display oneself conspicuously, defiantly, or boldly” in public and “to parade or display ostentatiously.” These senses approach those of flout, which dates from about the same period: “to treat with disdain, scorn, or contempt; scoff at; mock.” A sentence like Once secure in his new social position, he was able to flaunt his lower-class origins can thus be ambiguous in current English."
Posted February 7, 2012 at 1:46:25 AM
mmccrindle
Jeremy-
Komen was doing good things.
But you're right. I won't give them another dime either.
Kind of ironic what being 'PC' brings.
Then again wasn't the Catholic church trying to be PC (and falling for the left's socialist BS)?
Posted February 7, 2012 at 8:40:13 AM
veritaseequitas
I am glad that someone is bringing up the studies linking abortion to breast cancer. It makes no sense at all that a non-profit that was created to help fight breast cancer and thus promote life would provide funds to an organization that promotes death by abortion and in the process contributes to the incidence of breast cancer. I have never contributed to the SGK fund for that very reason.
As a taxpayer, I am appalled that some of my taxes go to funding Planned Parenthood at all..for any services. I do not believe it is the American taxpayers obligation to provide these services to women. We have taxpayer funded Medicaid to help the poor obtain health care through legitimate channels. Why do we then have to contribute more money to an abortion mill in the name of helping women? Absurd, ridiculous and false.
Posted February 7, 2012 at 8:44:09 AM
Dr. Phil
Actually medical studies have shown there is no link between abortion and breast cancer If you go to the American Cancer Society website (http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/MoreInformation/is-abortion-linked-to-breast-cancer) and the National Cancer Institute website, which is part of the National Institute of Health, (http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage)for a summary and references. You can make the argument against abortion on philosophical grounds but not on scientific grounds.
Posted February 8, 2012 at 12:38:47 AM
JJStryder
329,000 aborted lives.
Posted February 8, 2012 at 10:24:16 AM
JJStryder
In one year!
Posted February 8, 2012 at 10:25:49 AM