Options
Boxer, Fiorina and the Endless Recovery
· Sunday, September 5, 2010
At the end of Obamaland's Recovery Summer, Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer is betting that Californians want the federal government to keep growing.
GOP challenger Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett-Packard CEO, is betting that Californians want more private-sector jobs, not more government jobs. At Wednesday night's televised debate at Saint Mary's College in Moraga, Boxer -- anti-Wall Street -- faced off against Fiorina -- anti-Washington.
Boxer hit Fiorina because she laid off 30,000 workers and outsourced jobs. And, after being fired, Fiorina received a $21 million severance package. Fiorina pointed to California's unemployment rate -- which exceeds 12 percent -- to suggest that the Democrats know how to spend money, but not how to create private-sector jobs.
The most interesting question in the debate came from Tom Watson, a former HP employee, who reminded Fiorina that she once famously said, "There is no job that is America's God-given right anymore."
My guess is that Team Boxer was dancing at this turn of events.
Watson then asked, "Do you still feel that way? What are your plans to create jobs in California?"
Fiorina's answer may not be what Watson wanted to hear, and it certainly wasn't what your average happy-talk politician might say, but it is what voters need to hear.
"This is the 21st century," Fiorina responded. "Any job can go anywhere. And what worries me deeply is the jobs we lose now may not come back. And so we have to fight for every job. The truth is that California has a higher-than-average unemployment rate because we are destroying jobs and others are fighting harder for our jobs."
Earlier, Fiorina had stated that she had to make "the agonizing choice to lose some jobs to save more. And what enrages people in California as they see people making those tough choices absolutely every day and stores shuttering is federal government employees growing at 14.5 percent" over two years.
For her part, Boxer argued, "If ever we needed a United States senator from California to fight for American jobs, it's now." Then she hit Fiorina for not supporting Democratic spending proposals.
This is the world Boxer has created for herself. Last year, the federal deficit reached $1.4 trillion. Next year, expect more of the same. The Democrats want to claim the mantle of fiscal responsibility, but they want to keep spending.
So they've developed this myth that if they support extending the Bush tax cuts for all but the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans -- those who earn more than $250,000 -- they are being fiscally responsible. It's true that proposal is supposed to reduce the federal deficit by $700 billion over a decade. But note that practically no one advocates ending the rest of the Bush tax cuts, which by that logic would be the height of fiscal responsibility.
Then Team Boxer sits back as like-minded opinion leaders excoriate Fiorina for advocating "tax cuts" for the rich, mindless of the sagacity of not raising taxes on the rich during a recession.
In the last week, Boxer has referred Fiorina to a report by economists Alan Blinder and Mark Zandi -- a one-time economic adviser to GOP Sen. John McCain, Boxer likes to point out -- who found that Washington stimulus spending under Presidents Bush and Obama may have saved 8.5 million jobs.
Taking Boxer's advice to heed Zandi, I decided to look up his position on the Bush tax cuts. Last week, he told CBS News, "I think if the tax cuts expire for everybody, then we'll be back in recession, no doubt. It would be a huge policy mistake."
As Fiorina noted Wednesday night, "We can grow our economy again, but it means we have to fight for private-sector jobs. And, frankly, I don't think there are enough people in Washington who even understand why private-sector jobs are created."
Perhaps the problem is that inside the Beltway, the right to spend other people's money appears God-given.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
American Spectator Editor in Chief R. Emmett Tyrrell: "The Patriot is an indispensable resource for sound conservative opinion." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























B. B.
Well said. I am reminded of that infamous question each American needs to ask themselves: "When was the last time a poor man signed your paycheck?" And another: "Have you ever had a demoncrat promise to give you money they haven't stolen from someone else first?" You get what you vote for. Only in the case of a demoncrat victory, it won't last long enough to matter.
Posted September 5, 2010 at 9:45:30 AM
JJStryder
So what economic realities exist to cause companies such as HP to make the decision to move to overseas labor $ despite transportation cost increases? Maybe stupid irresponsible government regulations, minimum wage expectations, unions, taxes and the alphabet soup of overlapping government agencies and their corresponding oversight meddling hassles. Many brought to us by Boxer and her like minded buffoons. Come on California! Fiorina isn't perfect but Boxer is an arrogant, condescending,big government,elite environmentalist wacko who needs to go and we need to help her to the door.
Posted September 5, 2010 at 6:52:52 PM
BT
Barbara Boxer has shown she could give a tinker's damn about the state of CA and the citizens thereof. Her support of a plethora of policies that handicap California's economy is manifest. She, almost single-handedly, helped the Sierra Club and their minions burn down the state twice in the last six years. Her response was to blame blame blame everyone else for her foolishness. The State of California is in the mess it is - and I live here only until I can get the hell out - is due to the Barbara Boxers/Jerry Browns/Ron Dellams and, sad to say, Arnolds that have held sway here for far too long.
If Boxer came anywhere near me I would likely take a swing at her.
Posted September 6, 2010 at 12:14:13 PM
EV
BT,
A better choice of words for your "likely" is "have been tempted"
Throughout the discussions of the Boxer-Fiorina debate, I've seen few references to the fact that a CEO implements the directions given by the Board of Directors. Carly should be evaluated for her execution of those directions (which was excellent) not the choice of the corporate Board of Directors.
Posted September 7, 2010 at 7:52:02 AM