Options
Quantcast Government Jobs Expanding - On Your Dime
· Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Americans often wonder where all our tax money goes.
Well, a good chunk finances a steadily-growing government workforce. State and local governments spent $1.1 trillion on employee wages and benefits in 2008. That's half of what those governments spent overall.
And while the private sector job market remains bleak, there are more civil service jobs than ever. The federal Labor Department projects wage and salary employment in state and local government will increase 8 percent by 2018. That's a comforting thought for anyone who has to spend time in line at the DMV. Wish we could be as confident about the prospects for creating new corporate and manufacturing jobs to help pay for these new hires.
It's not simply the number of new jobs that costs taxpayers. It's that these government jobs pay more than ever. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that state and local government workers earn almost $40 per hour in wages, salaries and benefits. That's more than 25 percent higher than the combined compensation of the average private sector job ($27 per hour).
Public-sector employees have more paid leave and receive more than twice the health insurance benefits of private-sector employees. And government employees are famously more secure.
While the overall job market has been churning in recent years, destroying more jobs than it created, public-sector workers seldom are cut for any reason. Meanwhile, the number of government employees who voluntarily resign is one-third the rate of the private sector. "That suggests that state and local pay is higher than needed to attract qualified workers," notes Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute.
None of this seemed like much of a concern during good economic times. The growing economy of the mid-2000s generally brought higher tax revenues, providing more money for states and localities.
The recession ended that. Most states have seen tax revenues decline. Since states are required to maintain balanced budgets (a discipline the federal government routinely ignores), they've been struggling to make ends meet. A good chunk of last year's federal stimulus spending went to states to keep civil servants on the payroll.
But as Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels warned in The Wall Street Journal last September, "state governments will soon have to choose between a major downsizing or consigning themselves to permanent decline."
There's a bigger problem. Lord Keynes famously said that, "In the long run, we're all dead." But before they die, millions of retired state and local bureaucrats will drain trillions of dollars from taxpayers.
A report by Robert Novy-Marx and Joshua Rauh found that government pension funds are unfunded by some $3.2 trillion. That's an extra $27,000 that each American household will need to pony up in the decades ahead.
The price tag is so large because more than 80 percent of government workers are still eligible for old fashioned defined-benefit retirement programs. State and local governments are making massive spending promises, and taxpayers will have to pick up the tab. By contrast, such pension funds are only available to 20 percent of private-sector workers.
Civil service workers are also a throwback because they're heavily unionized. Last year some 7.9 million public-sector employees were in a union, while only 7.4 million private-sector workers were. More than a third of government workers pay union dues, while just 7 percent of the rest of the workforce is unionized.
Dan Henninger of The Wall Street Journal writes that the unionization of government workers dates to a 1962 executive order issued by President Kennedy. As a cost-saving measure, President Obama could lift that order, since government employees would still enjoy the protection of civil service laws and greater job security than most private-sector workers.
It's time governments took control of their payrolls. After all, we'll all be paying for these decisions for decades to come.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Acton Institute Senior Fellow, Marvin Olasky: "Liberals say and do so many nutty things. The Patriot puts them all in a nutshell--easy to crack and fun to read." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Peggy Noonan: Mitt Romney's Moment
- Argus Hamilton: From The Comedy Store
- Burt Prelutsky: Time to Start Playing Offense
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!























Ruth Ann Wilson
When the Senate Finance Committee, who I understand "writes the check" to fund the "Office of the President", decides to ONLY pay the Presidents' salary and his Cabinet and we are divested of the Bureaucratic ABC Agencies that "eat out our substance daily", O, what a day.
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted February 2, 2010 at 9:11:00 AM
MichaelSSEC
Government at all levels has acted as though it's perfectly normal to spend FAR more than we take in. Sure, a government can do that for a very short time -- i.e. during some sort of emergency, like a war or a large-scale natural disaster. But fiscal sanity must be restored quickly. That's not been happening.
Instead, state and federal governments (and increasingly municipalities) have been behaving as though they can spend radical amounts of money in good times & bad, without any consequence whatsoever, until the end of time. That's a gutless fantasy.
How about running your household that way. You know how much money you earn every month, but so what? Run out and buy a McMansion anyway, and so what if the mortgage is 32 times your income? Isn't it more important to have a comfortable home? While you're at it, you've always wanted that Cadillac SUV. Who cares if you couldn't even afford the insurance on that thing? It's more important to have a safe, reliable and socially impressive vehicle for your family, right? And be sure to buy a 52" wide screen TV, a home entertainment system, all new furniture, the latest video game systems, crackberries for your whole family, and new kitchen appliances. All on your credit cards. And when the bills come due, just open up a new charge card. Use the new card to make the payments on the old ones. You can pull that scam for years before anybody catches on.
That's how Barney Frank sees government. He knows it's not his money, so why should he care how it's spent -- as long as blowing wads of cash all over town gets him re-elected. Obama, Pelosi, Reid and all the rest of the Liberals are the same way. There's just one small problem with that philosophy: it's YOUR money. Your kids' future. Your country's prosperity. Your freedom. That's all.
It's time to demand fiscal sanity out of these crooks. Time to face reality and admit that we can't just print money. We can spend only as much as we take in, not another penny more. And the secret to a prosperous country is for government to take in only as much as we absolutely need to spend. So enough of these phony "jobs created or saved" programs, free cell phones for the poor, radical programs to combat phony global warming, and expensive favors for well-connected unions. We have a word for all that crap: CORRUPTION.
Posted February 2, 2010 at 2:33:04 PM