Options
Shortchanging Our Students
· Monday, February 22, 2010
Even in the depths of the Great Depression, with the economy bottomed out, Americans showed they could still think big. In just over a year, construction crews built a landmark that still stands proud, one recognized worldwide as a symbol of our country: the Empire State Building.
I recently visited the building to speak to an enthusiastic group of King's College students about the need to return to the principles of our Founding Fathers. Unfortunately, as a new study shows, many students simply aren't learning what makes America unique. In fact, what they are learning all too often helps divide rather than unite Americans.
This study, titled "The Shaping of the American Mind," is the latest in an annual series from the Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI.org), where I'm proud to serve as a trustee.
There's no mystery as to why today's college seniors lack basic knowledge of American history and institutions. Previous ISI reports revealed that schools of higher learning aren't teaching these principles. At some elite universities the seniors know less than the freshmen. The reports also show that Americans agree colleges should teach students about our shared history and civic principles.
But does knowing the fundamental principles of "the American experiment" influence the beliefs of our citizens? That's what this year's report aimed to find out. ISI researchers directed 33 questions to a representative sample of roughly 2,500 Americans. Many questions were taken from U.S. naturalization exams and high-school achievement tests. The report reached some important conclusions.
For example, even though colleges aren't teaching civic knowledge, it can be learned elsewhere: through religious institutions, patriotic organizations and books such as "We Still Hold These Truths," by Matthew Spalding of The Heritage Foundation.
And that leads to the report's second finding. Civic knowledge, however learned, has a broader and more diverse influence on Americans' thinking than college does.
To cite one example, the report found that having more civic knowledge makes a person "more likely to agree that prosperity depends on entrepreneurs and free markets; but less likely to agree that the free market brings about full employment." In other words, civic knowledge seems to make one more pragmatic but not more dogmatic. Those are traits Americans will need if we're to pass along a better world to coming generations.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the report concluded that additional civic knowledge increases a person's belief in American ideals and institutions.
The ISI survey showed that, overall, "Sixty-three percent of Americans disagree that America corrupts otherwise good people, 61 percent of Americans disagree that America's Founding documents are obsolete and 56 percent of Americans agree that prosperity depends upon entrepreneurs and free markets."
It further found that people with greater civic knowledge are less likely to believe that America corrupts otherwise good people, less likely to believe that the Founding documents are irrelevant, and more likely to believe that the free enterprise system works.
As our economy works to recover from another meltdown, we need to keep thinking big. We need to help more Americans learn the basic principles of civil society. The way forward is in understanding our great shared history.
When the Empire State Building opened, former New York Gov. Al Smith said it was "built by the brains, the brawn, the ingenuity and the muscle of mankind." The same applies to the United States. Let's make sure we pass the very concept of American greatness down to the next generation.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Syndicated Radio Host Dr. Laura Schlessinger: "The Patriot is the most informative and witty publication on the Internet. I read every issue!" It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Arnold Ahlert: CPAC Braces for Union & Occupier Chaos
- Michael Reagan: A Little More Heat
- George Will: GOP's Murky Rhetoric on National Defense
- Larry Elder: Aren't Republicans Supposed to Be Colorblind?
- Thomas Sowell: The Anti-Romney Vote
- Ann Coulter: Plutocrat Dems Attack Romney as 'Richie Rich'
- Burt Prelutsky: Was Idi Amin Smarter Than Martha Stewart?
- L. Brent Bozell: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: The Delousing of a Movement
- Jonah Goldberg: Liberals are the True Aggressors in Culture Wars
- Cal Thomas: Fudging the Numbers
- Michael Barone: GOP Must Convince Young People It's the Party of Options
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!























Ruth Ann Wilson
When LOCAL School Boards are answerable, once again, to the LOCAL constituents that elected them to office, we will start to see a "turn around". REPEAL 1965 Federal Revenue Sharing - It is the "noose around the neck of LOCAL School Boards".
We must return to LOCAL funding of schools, and everyone must realize, "If we don't have it, we don't spend it."
I have long advocated that the Public Universities "go out of business". Our Founders never intended for taxpayers to fund - "Higher Education" - "if you go to college, you go on your own nickel." Private Colleges, YES, Public Funded Universities, NO. It is not the business of State or Federal government in this Country to be in the "School Business", it is a "LOCAL" issue - 9th Amendment, Constitution of the United States. We're in a "mess" because FEDERAL & STATE governments got into an area that is "none of their business according to the Constitution". "Office of the President" - Dept. of Education was the "tool used."
1963 Supreme Court Ruling at the request of the atheist O'Hare - taking prayer and Bible reading out of the Public Schools. All LOCAL people agree, this ruling was "the beginning of the end" of the school system as the Founders' envisioned. PUBLIC SCHOOLS are a LOCAL decision.
COUNTY SOVEREIGNTY must be returned to we, the people.
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted February 22, 2010 at 9:36:00 AM
TJS
Government schools have priced themselves well above the market, just like other unions did to airlines, autos, and steel. We must demand vouchers - call them scholarships - for all students and parents, so they can exercise their own good judgement. It's time for the market to go to work and destroy government schools.
Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:42:08 PM
Marcus
Ruth Ann,
Public universties are valuable for society if properly executed. We don't need publicly funded liberal arts colleges I agree. I don't see what purpose they serve except to extend childhood. Teacher and technical colleges on the other hand are valuable. I don't think they need to be four years though. I think that high schools could be restructured to accomodate teaching a technical career paths so that the basics could be learned in high school and the kids could finish up at college.
liberal arts and pure science colleges should be private and four years long and funded by the folks that use the students or by the parents for liberal arts.
Government employees should not have a retirement plan except their own 401K, just like us saps out here in industry and agriculture and service. that would save a LOT of taxpayer money.
Oh, and civics courses should be required every year in school starting in the 4th grade.
Posted February 22, 2010 at 12:46:09 PM
Ruth Ann Wilson
I'll stand by my original post.
NO PUBLIC EDUCATION of higher learning. The taxpayers only participate at the LOCAL level in Public Education.
If you go to "COLLEGE", it is a private school and the student pays for it.
It is not the responsibility at the "college" level for taxpayers to subsidize the education.
We have always had "colleges" in this Country, but never Publicly subsidized.
For God & Country
Ruth Ann Wilson
Posted February 22, 2010 at 2:34:55 PM