Options
The Real 'Iron Lady'
· Monday, January 30, 2012
Reading about Meryl Streep's preparation to act in "The Iron Lady" could lead one to believe that the real Margaret Thatcher was difficult to understand.
But if you go back to the dark days Britain faced in the late 1970s when she became prime minister, it's really not that hard.
To pay its bills, Britain had to borrow money from the International Monetary Fund. Protracted labor disputes led to long strikes and the "Winter of Discontent" in 1978.
That year, dead bodies went unburied. Uncollected trash piled up in the streets. More strikes loomed. It was no surprise when the Labor prime minister was ousted in a vote of no confidence and replaced by the Conservative Thatcher.
Like Ronald Reagan, though, Thatcher saw a nation in decline not as an inevitability to be managed, but as a problem to be solved. She believed the answer to Britain's problems was not more socialism -- which she didn't hesitate to lambast by name -- but free enterprise.
"I wanted to achieve my ambition of a capital-owning democracy," she said. "This is a state in which people own houses, shares and have a stake in society, and in which they have wealth to pass on to future generations."
Getting there required stubbornness on Lady Thatcher's part. Unlike previous governments, both Labor and Conservative, she didn't intend to just go along to get along. She believed government was doing too much. She launched a plan to get rid of what she called Britain's "nanny state."
That mainly meant breaking the power of trade unions and monopoly nationalized industries. Thatcher also intended to take control of the money supply, shrink the budget deficit, trim state spending, cut taxes and reduce government regulations. Quite an agenda.
But eventually, she prevailed. The government rode out a violent coal miners' strike in 1984. In the past, miners had brought down governments. Not Thatcher's. She refused to compromise and launched a new era in labor relations.
She had an understanding, rare among politicians, of where the money that funded "government spending" comes from -- not from some magic coffer, but from the pockets of hard-working citizens. Politicians, she reminded us all, must borrow or tax the money they use. (Or, all too often, misuse.)
Thatcher also saw eye to eye with Reagan on the common-sense doctrine of peace through strength, not accommodation and appeasement. "Wars are not caused by the build-up of weapons," she told the U.S. Congress. "They are caused when an aggressor believe he can achieve his objectives at an acceptable price."
In addition, she had a keen appreciation for America's unique role in the world. As she remarked in 2002, as she accepted the Clare Boothe Luce Award:
"It is always good to come to America. Whereas other countries remind you of problems, America teaches you possibilities.
"America today is the only global super-power. Like it or not -- and, on balance, I do like it -- that is a fact. Only America has the reach and means to deal with Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein or the other wicked psychopaths who will sooner or later step into their shoes. The rest of the world can and should do more. But so often wealthy countries with much to offer and more to lose just cheer -- or grumble -- on the side-lines.
"For those who love liberty, the fortunes of America are even more our preoccupation than in years gone by."
It was because she loved liberty, and worked tirelessly to defend it, that we at The Heritage Foundation are proud to have Lady Thatcher as our Patron, and to be the home of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom. We know the real "Iron Lady." And no Hollywood production can substitute for the genuine article.
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Syndicated Radio Host Michael Reagan: "The vision and legacy of the Reagan Revolution flourish on the pages of The Patriot Post." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Arnold Ahlert: Catholics vs. Obama
- Michael Reagan: White House Website Gone Wild
- Ken Blackwell: I'll Have Another
- Jeff Jacoby: The Peace Process Battered Israel's Reputation
- Victor Davis Hanson: The Bad/Good Idea of Removing Assad
- Michael Barone: Cocooned Liberals Are Unprepared for Political Debate
- R. Emmett Tyrrell: The Great Debate
- Cal Thomas: The Media's Religion Deficit
- Larry Elder: Why Jeremiah Wright Matters -- Still
- Ben Shapiro: First, They Came for Cory Booker
- Ann Coulter: Figures Don't Lie: Democrats Do
- Burt Prelutsky: A President Not Fit for Man or Beast
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























mmccrindle
The lefty loonies in Hollywood will give Streep an acadamy award for no other reason that she was able to portray Thatcher without a perpetual scowl.
Imagine how Streep must have wrestled with her liberal conscience in order just to accept the role of sich a conservative heroine, Oh! the angst!
Hollywood makes me ill.
Posted January 30, 2012 at 8:29:15 AM
veritaseequitas
"She had an understanding, rare among politicians, of where the money that funded "government spending" comes from -- not from some magic coffer, but from the pockets of hard-working citizens. Politicians, she reminded us all, must borrow or tax the money they use. (Or, all too often, misuse.)"
So true. It aggravates me beyond reason that so often "government spending" is attributed in a way that portrays the government as actually producing something that brings in revenue. It is the taxpayers that are supporting the government and all of their nonsensical spending. The voters need to come to grips with this fact. Maybe when they do, a stop will be put to this monumental foolishness and folly by not reelecting those who are perpetuating the problem.
Posted January 30, 2012 at 9:37:14 AM
PDK
I do not know Meryl Streeps perspective of Margret Thatcher but I have to assume being a Holywood insider Meryl probably leans left. Therefore she probably lessens or demeans the Prime Minister somewhat, somehow.
It was curious that two great personalities, from two different but great countries, such as Reagan and Tatcher would rise and come to power at about the same time. That these two great personalities would both be conservative, and would both be what the Dr. ordered as necessary to preservation of their own countrys cultural life.
Tatcher should go down in history as one of GBs two great leaders of the 20th century. The other of course being Churchill, pretty good company.
I do not watch many movies, I will not be watching this one, but I sincerly hope that Streep and Holywood did not besmirch Thatcher, she, for her effort and achievements deserves better than that.
Nobama 2012, vote republican. Thank you.
Posted January 30, 2012 at 11:18:39 AM
Oldy
Applaud, Applaud, Applaud! Thanks, Now that being said let's see in detail just how we can mimic her policy making and apply as much as we can to our Government. I think though we have just a few more problems than She had. She had a medical system that was taking care of people we do not have yet. Wait a minute, could that be what Obama was trying to do? I wonder?
Posted January 30, 2012 at 2:44:18 PM
mmccrindle
@ Oldy -
Yes, that would be the failed health care system of England.
Just as all the other countries that have socialized medicine, wonderful things like 85 plus days to see a specialist (not too many cancer survivers to speak of), death panels that pick what treatments your eligible for - you know, little things like that.
By the way, it's good to see a useless idiot get in lockstep so quickly after your god Obama's SOTU address.
Posted January 30, 2012 at 3:36:02 PM