Self-Esteem, Self-Destruction

· Thursday, March 4, 2010

WASHINGTON -- Memo to that Massachusetts school where children in physical education classes jump rope without using ropes: Get some ropes. And you -- you are about 85 percent of all parents -- who are constantly telling your children how intelligent they are: Do your children a favor and pipe down.

These are nuggets from "NurtureShock: New Thinking About Children" by Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman. It is another book to torment modern parents who are determined to bring to bear on their offspring the accumulated science of child-rearing. Modern parents want to nurture so skillfully that Mother Nature will gasp in admiration at the marvels their parenting produces from the soft clay of children.

Those Massachusetts children are jumping rope without ropes because of a self-esteem obsession. The assumption is that thinking highly of oneself is a prerequisite for high achievement. That is why some children's soccer teams stopped counting goals (think of the damaged psyches of children who rarely scored) and shower trophies on everyone. No child at that Massachusetts school suffers damaged self-esteem by tripping on the jump rope.

But the theory that praise, self-esteem and accomplishment increase in tandem is false. Children incessantly praised for their intelligence (often by parents who are really praising themselves) often underrate the importance of effort. Children who open their lunchboxes and find mothers' handwritten notes telling them how amazingly bright they are tend to falter when they encounter academic difficulties. Also, Bronson and Merryman say that overpraised children are prone to cheating because they have not developed strategies for coping with failure.

"We put our children in high-pressure environments," Bronson and Merryman write, "seeking out the best schools we can find, then we use the constant praise to soften the intensity of those environments." But children excessively praised for their intelligence become risk averse in order to preserve their reputations. Instead, Bronson and Merryman say, praise effort ("I like how you keep trying"): It is a variable children can control.

They often cannot control cars. In 1999, a Johns Hopkins University study found that some school districts that abolished driver's education courses experienced a 27 percent decrease in auto accidents among 16- and 17-year-olds. Odd.

Not really. Bronson and Merryman say driver's ed teaches the rules of the road and mechanics of driving, but teenagers are in fatal crashes at twice the rate of other drivers because of poor decisions, not poor skills. The wiring in the frontal lobe of the teenage brain is not fully formed. Driver's ed courses make getting a license easy, thereby increasing the supply of young drivers who actually have holes in their heads.

Their unfinished heads should spend more time on pillows. Only 5 percent of high school seniors get eight hours of sleep a night. Children get a hour less than they did 30 years ago, which subtracts IQ points and adds body weight.

Until age 21, the circuitry of a child's brain is being completed. Bronson and Merryman report research on grade schoolers showing that "the performance gap caused by an hour's difference in sleep was bigger than the gap between a normal fourth-grader and a normal sixth-grader." In high school there is a steep decline in sleep hours, and a striking correlation of sleep and grades.

Tired children have trouble retaining learning "because neurons lose their plasticity, becoming incapable of forming the new synaptic connections necessary to encode a memory. ... The more you learned during the day, the more you need to sleep that night."

The school day starts too early because that is convenient for parents and teachers. Awakened at dawn, teenage brains are still releasing melatonin, which makes them sleepy. This is one reason why young adults are responsible for half the 100,000 annual "fall asleep" automobile crashes. When Edina, Minn., changed its high school start from 7:25 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., math/verbal SAT scores rose substantially.

Furthermore, sleep loss increases the hormone that stimulates hunger and decreases the one that suppresses appetite. Hence the correlation between less sleep and more obesity.

Bronson and Merryman slay a slew of myths. But perhaps the soundest advice for parents is: Lighten up. People have been raising children for approximately as long as there have been people. Only recently -- about five minutes ago, relative to the long-running human comedy -- have parents been driving themselves to distraction by taking too seriously the idea that "as the twig is bent the tree's inclined." Twigs are not limitlessly bendable; trees will be what they will be.

(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

TJS

Great column. We need some particulars on:

1. "a striking correlation of sleep and grades" - wow. Where can we find that study?

2. The correlation between sleep and obesity. What is the correlation, where is the study?

George Will writes the best research-backed columns in the business.

Posted March 4, 2010 at 10:44:55 AM


MichaelSSEC

The sleep-neural development correlation has been around a long time. At least a decade. The sleep-obesity thing is new to me, but it doesn't seem far-fetched.

The whole self-esteem as a goal unto itself has been a fraud since it became a fad with pop psychologists over 30 years ago. The trouble is, heaping kids with praise that's not earned just gives them a false sense of entitlement. They feel "special" and successful all right, until faced with an actual challenge -- at which point they generally crumple like empty soda cans.

Contrariwise, giving children praise when they've earned it through actual accomplishments and achievements results in genuine self-esteem backed by the strength of experience. They've overcome obstacles and setbacks along the way, so when they meet a new challenge they're better equipped to handle it because their self-esteem isn't empty and hollow. It's well supported by proven resilience, discipline, overcoming adversity, pride in achievements and other character-building traits.

One might say that self-esteem is like a muscle. Flatter it with empty praise and unearned trophies and it remains a weak, flaccid, undeveloped organ that will fail the first time it meets an unaccustomed challenge. But give it real exercise and goals to meet, and it grows stronger until once-difficult goals seem routine and it takes greater obstacles to challenge it. Test it with something new and it's much better able to rise to the occasion. Amazing how any parent could miss that self-evident fact of life.

Posted March 4, 2010 at 2:01:34 PM


Brian

Mr. Will, what can I say, but, "Well, duh!" No one's assesment of your self-esteem is as important as your own, and children will still know deep down whether or not they truly deserve praise. Earning an "Atta boy" is far more rewarding than being given one just for showing up. When everbody makes the team simply by showing up for tryouts, there is no incentive to work harder, therefore, no growth.

Posted March 7, 2010 at 11:10:33 PM


Bill Scott

Great column. Just last year a suburb of Cleveland decided to do away with a boy's baseball league "ALLSTAR" team because so few would be selected and so many would seffer "self esteem". One comment by a resident in that suburb seemed like a "no brainer". The comment was that he had gone through the same school system and got average grades, was never selected for the National Honor Society but really never felt any lack of self esteem as a result. What's the difference in recognition for academics or athletics? Are the athletes better equipped for not being recognized for achievement?

Posted March 13, 2010 at 2:16:42 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund