HBO's Palin Pollution

· Friday, February 24, 2012

Sarah Palin's top aides held a conference call to denounce the forthcoming HBO movie "Game Change," which like any ultraliberal media production, knocks Palin as a mentally imbalanced moron. Reporters are already underlining the Palin aides haven't seen the movie.

But isn't that the point? As Pat Buchanan once said about another subject, "Does one need to lift the manhole cover to know what's below?" Did the Clinton team wait to see the movie before begging ABC to kill "Path to 9/11"? Did the Kennedy team wait to see the miniseries "The Kennedys" before getting it demoted to the Reelz channel? The Palin folks can be pretty certain -- especially since the trailer itself announces it's a hit job.

Just see the rave review of Baltimore TV critic David Zurawik, who has seen this transparent propaganda, and the game is over.

"In a rational world, this film will help guarantee that Sarah Palin will never be elected to any major office again," he asserts triumphantly. Zurawik lines up just a few snippets of the Palin-bashing he relished.

1. McCain strategist (and Palin-bashing media darling) Steve Schmidt (played by Woody Harrelson) offers this analysis of the McCain-Palin ticket: "This wasn't a campaign. It was a bad reality show."

2. More than one adviser raises the possibility of Palin being mentally ill. And some of the actions and words attributed to her in the film lend credence to that smear. Zurawik adds, "I can't wait to hear the self-serving howls on Fox News when they see how Roger Ailes' million-dollar analyst mistake is depicted in the film."

3. Standing onstage on election night when it's all over, McCain says privately to Palin: "You are one of the leaders of the party now. Don't let yourself get co-opted by Limbaugh and the other extremists. They'll destroy the party if you let them."

4. Zurawik loved "how deftly the film uses documentary evidence to show Palin's incredible ignorance of foreign and even national affairs. Yes, the Katie Couric and Charlie Gibson interviews are front and center -- and amplified. And Palin looks even more uninformed, dazed, confused and silly because the filmmakers share the point of view of senior McCain advisers, such as Schmidt, who literally moan in agony as Palin infamously starts talking about the geography of Alaska and Russia."

The filmmakers use real footage of Couric and then cut in Julianne Moore's fake Palin. Other reviews note that Steve Schmidt's actual Palin-trashing, "Game Change" book-promoting interview on "60 Minutes" is the exclamation point at the end of the film. HBO is merging their leftist "docudrama" with real liberal-bias "news" clips to leave one unmissable point: Never vote for Sarah Palin. Ever. For anything.

The last HBO docudrama from this team of director Jay Roach and screenwriter Danny Strong was "Recount," which made heroes out of Al Gore's aides and lawyers in 2000 as they tried to change the Florida election results. One reviewer summed it up as "a screechy example of liberal Hollywood condescension," and "the film's flair for exaggeration is as flabbergasting as it is embarrassing."

It should be safe to assume that HBO launched this hatchet job into production with the notion that Palin was going to run for president. (She's still hinting that she'd love to be picked if the GOP has a brokered convention.) This whole enterprise reeks like a super PAC ad, complete with a pile of Obama-supporting actors and an Obama-bundler as executive producer--Tom Hanks.

The film is called "Game Change," after the book with the same title. But in the actual book, when does Sarah Palin really appear? In Chapter 20, titled "Sarahcuda," on page 353. When the book came out in early 2010, the hottest backstage tidbits were about Obama. Harry Reid praised Barack Obama's political appeal as a "light-skinned" black man with "no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one." Ted Kennedy was furious at Bill Clinton after Clinton sneered that Obama was so inexperienced that "a few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee." But HBO had no interest in hiring actors to smear Obama or Reid or Clinton. How about the relationship of John and Elizabeth Edwards, which is clearly ripe for cinematic exploration/exploitation? HBO ignored how Edwards staffers told the authors that Mrs. Edwards made them feel like "battered spouses." In brief, the authors wrote: "What the world saw in Elizabeth: a valiant, determined, heroic everywoman. What the Edwards insiders saw: an abusive, intrusive, paranoid, condescending crazy woman."

But HBO wants to paint the Democrats as the valiant heroes and paint the Republicans as the paranoid crazy women. Nobody needs to wait until March to wonder whether HBO is ridiculous when it puts out a statement calling this movie "a balanced portrayal of the McCain/Palin campaign."

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

Craig

I have a question. Why are liberals and the media so consumed with trying to make Sarah Palin look like a mentally retarded moron? Are they that scared of her?

If memory serves, several months ago Palin emails were released and it was determined that she did nothing wrong and that she was a good public servant who did her job to the best of her ability. If I remember correctly, the news media couldn't find anything to incriminate her with and decided to give up on the smear Palin nonsense.

So why again? What has Palin done to deserve this? If she is that much of a threat, then why not say so. Seems to me like the Liberals are truly scared that Palin could cause them to lose control and power and thats not what they want.

This is nothing but a baseless attack on someone who has really nothing wrong.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 9:01:47 AM


Pamela Heckel

She a capable woman and a Republican. They do the same thing to capable Blacks who are Republicans. It's Junior High School all over again.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 10:28:40 AM


BNgranny

Where are the feminists? Shouldn't they be the ones defending this strong, capable woman? No. Palin doesn't deserve their support because she's not a liberal Dem.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 11:36:31 AM


Sleepy Gonzales

Brent, you give a good reason why I wouldn't pay a nickel to add HBO to my list of home TV cable channels, and if they offered it for free, why I would program my TV to bypass it.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 12:15:37 PM


J.E. KIRTLEY

SIMPLE - If the left did not see her political abilities as a threat they would not be spending these large amounts of money in an attempt to damage her.

KIRT

Posted February 24, 2012 at 2:07:05 PM


Sherry

Why do "conservatives" follow the lead of "liberals" and talk about what the people pulling the media messaging strings dictate?

Posted February 24, 2012 at 2:19:41 PM


LCDR USN Ret

At some point, those of us who are sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution, need to do something about the "domestic" enemies.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 2:54:29 PM


Hugh McKeon

This is easy to avoid; simply don't subscribe to HBO. Or un-subscribe.

The added bonus is the avoidance of Bill Maher.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 3:39:54 PM


Jim in WNC

Let me start by saying I'm not a big Palin fan. However, the media became completely unhinged over her. I finally figured out why. She was a threat to the girly-men in the establishment media--and at a very primal level. You know, such paragons of manly virtue like Anderson Cooper, Chris Matthews, and Brian Williams. She hunts, fishes, skins game, shoots rifles, drives snow mobiles, etc. Those are the kinds of things that terrify the leftist talking heads. In other words, her Alaskan outdoor lifestyle was in stark contrast to their pasty, effeminate, cocktail party lives. They know she has more testosterone than they do and it simply scares the panties off of them.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 4:49:41 PM


J Henry Jr.

I'm no big Sarah fan, but sometimes PDS is fun to watch. Most of what they say is obviously made up and honest people with any brains know that. You don't get to become governor of Alaska by being a right wing extremist moron and people understand that.

I found it interesting that when TLC did the Sarah Palin's Alaska show, they didn't trash her in any readily noticeable way. In fact, when Kate Gosselin and her Plus 8 went on the show, Kate looked exactly like the whiny primadonna princess that she is and Sarah looked great.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 5:39:45 PM


David

If you are a liberal the greatest threat to America is not terrisom, the ecomny, debt, China,Russia,Iran,North Korea,it's Sarah Pailan and the tea party. If they are elected woman will die, children will starve, seniors will be pushed off cliffs in their wheelchairs, blacks will hang from trees, the inviroment will be ruined and the econmy will be destroyed because they are not for the little guy. All they care about is tax cuts for the rich.

Posted February 25, 2012 at 7:45:11 AM


JJStryder

I don't subscribe to any of the movie channels. Haven't for years. Why? The content. Hollywood product is generally substandard. For every "Kings Speech" there are literally thousands of "Hangovers". Hollywood directs its movies to children. And so a Sarah Palin cartoon is par for the course. I don't spend my hard earned money on inferior products.

Tom Hanks is mixed blessing. Good actor. Loved "Band of Brothers" and "Pacific". But politically he is a stupid liberal.

Posted February 25, 2012 at 8:58:36 AM


Lee Metford

If you really want to put an end to this nonsense, opt out. Suck it up and cut the cable completely. Don't forget to let the cable company know why.

Posted February 25, 2012 at 12:06:26 PM


Terry Webb

Continuing to bash Sarah Palin is akin to shoving a liberal finger into the freedom dyke. The pressure will eventually pour through and swamp the lies, obfuscations, corruption, and sleaziness of the left.

Posted February 25, 2012 at 9:35:26 PM


DavidMac

The leftists use basic political strategy when they bash Palin. The playbook for leftists politics includes making someone or some group "The Enemy". Obama has chosen to make Republicans in the House "The Enemy". The media has selected Palin.

This strategerie isn't new. George Orwell understood that leftist politics cannot stand alone based on its accomplishments (because there are none). In "1984", Orwell wrote about the "2 minute Hate" where the TV viewers screamed about Emmanuel Goldstein, a supposed revolutionary responsible for every disaster.

The American leftists/Marxists/utopians (call them what you will) demand a scapegoat and Sarah Palin fits the bill (at least, in their warped point of view). Obama's disastrous foreign and domestic policies are muted by the outraged screams of HATE against Sarah (Goldstein) Palin.

Posted February 26, 2012 at 9:54:31 AM


Ken

The radical left and media elites have no substitve material to support their agenda and philosophy. History, facts, rational thought, morality, judeo-Christian values, common sense, transparancy and logic all undermine the liberal agenda.

All they have are sensory "feelings", primal appetites, bombast and illusion. Their values and agenda can not stand on merit or their record. Therefore, the left's bets and usually only "defense" is to distort or censor inconvenient or contrary facts and opposing views, and to attack and destroy any critic, opponent or "traitor". That is why they give no quarter and name-calling, blackballing and ambush are their weapons of choice.

Bipartisan negotiation with radical leftists is a futile and losing proposition almost 100% of the time.

Posted February 27, 2012 at 1:55:23 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund