Harry Reid Apologizes to Blacks for ... What?

· Thursday, January 14, 2010

Tough week. As for Simon Cowell's impending departure from "American Idol," NBC/Jay Leno's failure at 10 p.m. and Democratic Sen. Harry Reid's "Negro dialect" comment, which incited more angst?

According to a new book about the '08 presidential campaign, Reid, the Senate majority leader, said that then-Sen. Barack Obama appealed to voters as a "light-skinned" black man with "no Negro dialect" -- that is, "unless he wanted to have one." Egad!

Faster than you could say "Tawana Brawley," "civil rights leader" Al Sharpton popped up on Fox News Channel to pronounce himself "offended" but willing to accept Reid's apology. The host exercised commendable restraint in not bringing up the time Sharpton, the moral arbiter of all things offensive to blacks, called a black former mayor of New York a n----- whore. But let us stay focused.

Don't tase me, bro! said Reid. He quickly apologized. No "my remarks were taken out of context" or "what I meant was" or charges of "tabloid journalism." He just apologized -- to President Obama, to members of the Congressional Black Caucus -- to everyone, it seems, except the light-skinned Tiger Woods, who is apparently taking no one's calls. Luckily, Reid found Obama in a more magnanimous mood than the President was when -- during the Great Harvard Professor Racial Profiling Case -- he accused the Cambridge police of acting "stupidly." Timing (and party affiliation) is everything.

Reid went to school on the way former Senate Republican leader Trent Lott handled his "racially insensitive" remarks. Lott, on the 100th birthday of Sen. Strom Thurmond in 2002, praised the elderly former segregationist and said America would have been a better country had Thurmond won the presidency in 1948. Republican racism yet again unmasked!

Critics rejected the explanation that Lott was simply trying to flatter an old man. Even Republicans, squirming like global warming alarmists trying to explain away record cold temps, dumped him. Lott's remarks symbolized nothing short of a Klan revival meeting. Lott apologized, apologized and apologized. He even did a perp walk on Black Entertainment Television, where the host asked the chastened Lott, "Will you take a closer look at the people you align yourself with?" Lott practically agreed to raise his hand before using the restroom. Goodbye leadership position.

To avoid the same fate, Reid followed the path of former Air Force Academy football coach Fisher DeBerry: Apologize -- early and often -- and let others decide what, exactly, you are apologizing for. After a lopsided loss during the 2005 season, DeBerry said, "(Our opponent) had a lot more Afro-American players than we did, and they ran a lot faster than we did." Unleash the hounds!

DeBerry's athletic director criticized him for making a "seriously, seriously inappropriate comment. ... This was not Fisher DeBerry, not the man I've known for 25 years." Why, the Air Force "has a zero-tolerance policy for any racial or ethnic discrimination or discrimination of any kind." Oh, sure, a black Air Force player said, "We, as a team, didn't think he meant anything by it. ... I personally wasn't offended." And a white teammate said, "There are 250 guys on the team, and there is not one player that was offended." But still ...

DeBerry held a news conference. "I realize the things I said might have been hurtful to many people," he said, "and I want everyone to understand that I never intended to offend anyone." So far, so good. "I have made a mistake, and I ask for everyone's forgiveness," he continued.

OK. But what exactly, asked the reporters, was he apologizing for? Is it wrong to say blacks run fast? "I don't think there is anything wrong with that," DeBerry replied. Oops. "We have some Caucasian players that run very, very well, also." Uh-oh. Sensing danger, the athletic director stepped in. "What we're talking about is speed," offered the AD. "There's speed that cuts across black, white, gray, blue, whatever." Huh? "It was just an inappropriate comment, and you all know it was an inappropriate comment." Racial insensitivity, understand, is like what a Supreme Court justice once said about smut. You know it when you see it.

"Light-skinned"? Didn't black director Spike Lee do a film, "School Daze," about how light-skinned fraternity students considered themselves more appealing than their dark-skinned counterparts?

"Negro"? The term is on this year's census. What about the United Negro College Fund?

"No Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one"? Last January, National Public Radio interviewed black Obama supporter and linguistics professor John McWhorter. He said: "(Obama) is a very bidialectal person. ... He can talk in a way where you would not know that he was black over the phone. ... But then, especially when he talks to a black audience, he can sound quite a bit like (Martin Luther King colleague) Rev. Lowry sounded at the inauguration."

Now, if Sen. Reid wishes to apologize for something real -- such as the budget-breaking abomination of ObamaCare or his shady self-enriching Nevada real estate deals -- I'll take the call.

COPYRIGHT 2010 LAURENCE A. ELDER
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

JeanMal

Great article! I love your analysis. HOWEVER, here is the problem - I have read a lot about this issue but I have found no one courageous enough to point out that even Obama's top black appointees are mostly if not all light-skinned people. From the White House to his cabinet, from the EPA to NASA, all the black appoints seem light-skinned. Could this be the reason Obama quickly forgave Reid??? This problem is much deeper in the black community than most whites think.

I hope one reporter/analyst picks up on this.

Posted January 14, 2010 at 12:15:12 AM


MelP

We must change our paradigm that race does not represent diversity. It is just a difference and not important. Things that are not important to us are not protected. Our skills, traits, talents and abilities are demonstrated and recognized by all and given importance. In a given situation, a mechanic can be more important that a physician, etc. It will not be an easy task, yet the seed can take root and grow. Just maybe we can stop fighting about who is right or wrong or who is more important and leave history alone or quit trying to write or rewrite history. Whatever is the truth is the truth and other than keeping the fight alive or gain an advantage, why do we waste so much time!

I believe that the true diversity of America is its vast array of skills, traits, talents and abilities. That is my definition of diversity. I believe the differences in religions, sexes, races; nationalities, politics, etc. are just that "differences". We need to praise everyone's differences, not inflate our own as being more important or due more recognition than others. We need to stop battling between or over our differences and why how they evolved, and; concentrate on "Unity". United we can do and accomplish anything we as a nation accept as a common goal for ourselves and our country, so long as we have a commonness of purpose, a common language; and, "Unity".

Stop the fighting! It is not accomplishing anything, other than some personal agendas to continue the recognition or importance game! If you think about it, the media or certain individuals make money keeping the fight alive!

Posted February 15, 2010 at 2:31:38 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund