Barack 'All of the Above' Obama

· Friday, February 24, 2012

President Obama fought back against rising oil and retail gas prices in a speech in Florida on Thursday. But it was a curious speech. He started out by mocking Republicans, stating that GOP candidates are licking their chops as gasoline prices rocket up. He said, "They are already dusting off their three-point plans for $2 gas. I'll save you the suspense: Step one is drill, step two is drill, and step three is keep drilling."

Very clever. It's kind of what Newt Gingrich said in this week's Arizona debate.

But here's the curious part. Obama said, "If we're going to take control of our energy future, if we're going to avoid these gas-price spikes down the line, then we need a sustained all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy -- oil, gas, wind, solar, nuclear, biofuels and more."

That's a Republican policy. All of the above. George W. Bush used to say it. John McCain ran on it in 2008. And you hear Republicans talk in similar terms all the time. "All of the above."

Obama next took credit for record oil and gas production. He took a bow for more rigs and the approval of pipelines (including from Canada!). He then argued that his administration has opened millions of acres for oil and gas exploration.

Well, I don't know about the pipeline part. He sure hasn't opened Keystone XL. And most people in the oil business say the administration has been slow-walking offshore permits, restricting access on federal lands, and excluding Alaska and the Arctic. They also note the general nuisance of the EPA, including its recent attack on hydraulic fracking.

But people in the business will tell you that production is high, and that things began turning around years before the administration took office. Of course, the great energy revolution has come with all the new shale fields in the Dakotas, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas and elsewhere, which has led to a gusher of new oil and natural gas.

The fact that Obama sounds like a Republican doesn't mean that he's opened the barn door to all manner of new leases and permits. But the reality is that his administration has loosened things up a bit. Whether drill, drill, drill would produce $2 gasoline is an interesting debate. But surely the U.S. is on the road to energy independence if the government is more hands-off.

The fact remains, however, that right now there's rising public angst over higher gasoline prices. That could become an economic problem, but it's more rapidly becoming a political problem for the White House.

A lot of consumers and motorists are trying to figure out why all this new energy production hasn't stopped prices from rising. The best answer I can come up with is Iran. As the Iranians rattle their sabers over the Strait of Hormuz, oil traders are taking long positions in the market. According to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, traders with net-long positions of oil contracts worth $100,000 have increased from 181,000 in early October to 281,000 lately. (Hat tip to economist Conrad DeQuadros).

During this period, oil prices have jumped about $35, or 37 percent. Today the WTI contract for light sweet crude closed above $108. And it's worth noting that non-oil commodity indexes during this period have increased by less than 2 percent. That means the oil spike is a supply shock, not economic-demand driven. And since mid-December, AAA retail gas prices have increased about 11 percent from $3.22 to $3.60.

Undoubtedly, gasoline prices are following oil prices higher. And the oil-price jump is a function of trader worries that Iran might choke off the Hormuz Strait, leading to a substantial, if temporary, oil-supply shortage.

Obama cites the Iranian situation in his speech, and he's got an important point. We can debate the merits of Obama's Iranian policy. But the reality is that energy prices are rising on speculative trading demands over a potential worst-case scenario.

If that worst case scenario doesn't come to pass, energy prices could well retreat. In any case, even the oil and gas spike thus far is not likely to have a significant economic impact. All that oil and gas shale production from private, not federal, lands is a big reason why. The new natural-gas supplies have caused the price of natural gas to fall substantially. That means much lower home-heating bills for consumers. And the relatively mild winter so far is another factor contributing to lower utility bills.

The moral of this story is that America should continue to drill, drill, drill, and put up the Keystone XL pipeline, and work with Canada to build an energy-independent North America. But as long as the Iranian threat is unsolved, the future risk of higher energy prices is going to be a fact of life.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.


Comments

BNgranny

So, Mr. Kudlow, I have a question that I haven't heard anyone ask: What happens to the cost and availability of products using petroleum as an ingredient? Too many to list but include plastic everything (bags, dishes, pipes, etc.) and polyester (clothing)to name a few.

We already know that skyrocketing fuel costs add to the cost of food and other commodities that must be shipped but what about the petroleum products? Or are they already manufactured out of this country so no one is concerned about that effect on our manufacturing and jobs?

Just asking.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 10:58:29 AM


Pamela Heckel

Remember Stephen Chu's wish for $8/gallon gas? Actions by Iran would not affect the price in the US if US companies were given drilling permits.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 11:12:16 AM


Sherry

I still don't get how you wrote all of that and came up with a conclusion, "as long as the Iranian threat..." PUleese. There is no threat on earth greater than the threat of big GOV, FED, WTI control of our economy through unwarranted military action. Stop cheering for government intervention in other people's countries. If America would simply offer Iran an equitable business arrangement for their oil, Iran would be happy to take our money for their oil. Since the GOV, FED and WTI prefer stealing their oil using American military might, they are less willing to "trade" with us. Free market economics operates in a free market. Not a militarily enforced market set to assure that the rich get richer and the poor are used for cannon fodder.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 2:47:44 PM


Richard Ryan

I am not sure where Mr.Kudlow gets his figures. He says that production is up, but I read elsewhere that off-shore drilling and production is down 40 percent as well as is drilling and production on federal lands. For Obama to say that drilling is up under his administration is so false that I cannot even find words to describe it. Obama has to be the most two-faced individual I have ever seen, and that is saying something since I am nearly 79 years old and have seen a lot of liars in my time.

Richard Ryan

Lamar,Missouri - Birthplace of Harry S Truman

Posted February 24, 2012 at 5:16:51 PM


Capt. Call

America should seek energy independence. We should be able to laugh off any threats by Persians, Arabs, and any other group! How well I remember the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973! It has been 39 years, and exactly what has our Government done about the problem? Nothing! Both parties are to blame for this. Iran's Islamists hate us, and have vowed to destroy us. We do not need to be in partnership with the Devil!

'Obama said, "If we're going to take control of our energy future, if we're going to avoid these gas-price spikes down the line, then we need a sustained all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy -- oil, gas, wind, solar, nuclear, biofuels and more."' Obama is an idiot of the highest rank. He desires none of these things! He only spouts republican ideas as a means of lying to the people to distract them from his abysmal record, and to get votes.

Posted February 24, 2012 at 8:16:04 PM


mac

@Sherry-

When did we ever go to any country and get their oil through 'military might'? What are you talking about?

That sounds like a talking point from the Huffington Post.

It is indeed both parties fault - Bush had both houses and failed to streamline domestic oil production. Obama just lies about his true agenda and the morons somehow can't connect the dots that his vermin are in charge of the EPA and other production stone walls.

If Bush acted then we would be energy independant right now and paying $1.50 a gallon.

Posted February 25, 2012 at 9:48:37 PM


Post a Comment

Please keep comments civil and brief. Obscene, profane, abusive and off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

(required, displayed)
(required, not displayed)
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Connect with The Patriot Post






Our Mission

To Support and Defend -- Read The Patriot Post -- It's Right. It's Free. -- www.patriotpost.us

"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher


The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!

Support The 2012 Patriot Fund