Options
GOP Must Convince Young People It's the Party of Options
· Thursday, February 9, 2012
The Republican presidential candidates, except for Ron Paul, haven't been paying much attention to young voters in the primaries and caucuses so far. But any Republican nominee -- which is to say probably Mitt Romney, or maybe Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum -- had better be paying attention to them in the summer and fall.
The reason three of the four Republicans haven't paid much attention to young voters is that the under-30 folks have been turning out in the Republican contests in miniscule numbers.
According to entrance and exit polls, voters under 30 accounted for 15 percent of participants in Iowa, 12 percent in New Hampshire, 9 percent in South Carolina, 6 percent in Florida and 8 percent in Nevada.
By way of comparison, voters that age were 18 percent of the electorate in November 2008.
And, in that election, they voted 66 percent to 32 percent for Barack Obama over John McCain. Voters above that age favored Obama by only 50 percent to 49 percent. McCain would have won if the voting age were 35.
In this year's Republican contests, the big winner among young voters has been Ron Paul. His libertarian message -- on monetary policy, marijuana policy and foreign policy -- has brought out the under-30 voters, though many and perhaps most don't identify themselves as Republicans at all.
Paul got nearly half the young votes in Iowa and New Hampshire and carried the young voters -- and little else -- in Nevada. He narrowly edged Gingrich among young voters in South Carolina and finished second among them in Florida.
Young voters were not buying Mitt Romney's act in the first three contests. Only 13 percent of them voted for him in Iowa, 26 percent in New Hampshire and 16 percent -- the lowest among the Republicans -- in South Carolina.
He did do better later, carrying the 18-29 group with 41 percent in Florida, and he only ran 41 to 36 percent behind Paul in Nevada.
Nevertheless, it's fair to say that the candidate who seems overwhelmingly likely to be the Republican nominee hasn't shown much appeal to young voters.
That's problematic for the general election because, while young Americans have clearly soured somewhat on Barack Obama -- the change they hoped for, whatever it was, hasn't arrived -- they are still the most Democratic-inclined age group by a considerable margin.
A poll conducted for Generation Opportunity, a conservative group, reports that 43 percent of young voters are not satisfied with their current level of employment and 77 percent have delayed or expect to delay a major life change -- like buying a home, paying off student loans, moving or getting married.
It also found that majorities believe that the economy grows best when people can create jobs without government interference and that companies would hire more if business profits taxes were reduced.
A Pew Research poll of this Millennial Generation conducted last fall found that Obama's job approval was only 49 percent -- 17 percent below his 2008 support. Only 39 percent of white Millennials approved his performance.
I have long thought that there was a tension between Millennials' former enthusiasm for Obama and the thrust of the Obama Democrats' policies.
This is an iPod/Facebook 21st century generation. Young Americans want to customize their own world. They want to shape their own destinies, not be part of a herd that is shepherded from one pasture to another. They like the advice of Obama appointee Anne-Marie Slaughter: Design your own profession.
The Obama policies are redolent of mid-20th century welfare-state planning. From Obamacare's unaccountable boards determining the care patients get to his affection for high-speed rail that will forever run on the same tracks, choice is limited or eliminated. Central planners determine your future.
It's as if every iPod had an identical play list and every Facebook page were the same.
Romney and the other Republicans can claim that their policies, by providing choices and opening markets to spur innovation that no central authority can plan, will enable young people to choose their futures.
Obama likes to emphasize the Obamacare provision that lets "children" up to age 26 stay on their parents' health insurance. Apparently that polls well with Millennials.
Republicans should counter that they want young people to choose their own health plan, from firms competing for their business. An economy liberated from Obama's taxes and regulations can provide more choices and opportunities.
Romney and the others haven't been speaking to young voters directly yet. They need to get started.
COPYRIGHT 2012 THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
Third-party content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Patriot Post.
Options
Subscribe
Author Dr. Bill Bennett: "The Patriot is leading the charge in the battle to restore America's values -- a vital ally on the front...." It's Right. It's Free. Subscribe now!
The Right Opinion
- Rich Galen: Obama & Romney Tout Good News
- Edwin J. Feulner: 'Law of the Sea' Treaty: Sink It
- Arnold Ahlert: With Democrats, You're Either All In - or All Out
- Oliver North: Memorial Day 2012
- Ken Blackwell: Remarks on Religious Liberty
- L. Brent Bozell: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
- Michelle Malkin: Obama's Land of the LOST
- Rebecca Hagelin: The 'Gay Marriage' Spin
- David Limbaugh: Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone
- Linda Chavez: Overreach by Unions in Wisconsin
- Mona Charen: Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again
- Jonah Goldberg: Big Business Gets the Hollywood Treatment
Grassroots Commentary
Policy and Analysis
- Heritage Foundation Insider
- Heritage Foundation Research
- American Enterprise Institute
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- The Cato Institute
- Hoover Institution
- National Rifle Association
- Ludwig von Mises Institute
- Citizens Against Government Waste
- National Center for Policy Analysis
- The Heartland Institute
Our Mission
"The Patriot's mission is to advocate for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and to promote free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. Our objective is to provide Patriots across our nation with a touchstone of First Principles through brief, informative and entertaining analyses of relevant news, policy and opinion from reputable research, advocacy and media organizations, so they may better support and defend those Principles, and enlist others to join our ranks." —Mark Alexander, Publisher
The Patriot Post is not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we accept no advertising. Our mission and operations are funded entirely by the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you!
























mmccrindle
Michael, what do you expect?
The Dept. of Education, which should be dissolved, has been indoctinating these 'kids' from kindergarten.
Democrats have seen how well it's worked in every communist country and have done an admirable job of duplicating them.
The smart ones come from families who haven't bought into the "It takes a Village" BS.
Posted February 9, 2012 at 9:04:58 AM
wjmccrindle
At my Colorado precinct caucus meeting Tuesday evening, I would wager the median age at near 50. There were only one young lady who had just graduated college, her mother, and the remainder of folks were well past middle age. The youth has been indoctrinated, and must be made aware that one doesn't go back in to swim after a shark has torn off your arm. I think they are starting to wake to this, heck, I pray they do by November.
Posted February 9, 2012 at 11:29:29 AM
Steve
The establishment GOP has no interest in shrinking government any more than the Democrats; they merely differ in priorities for MORE spending.
THUS, it will be difficult for any contender, with GOP establishment backing, to adopt part of Ron Paul's platform to end the FAILED war on drugs, to adopt non-interventionist foreign policy, to reduce SPENDING in real terms, not just budget fudging, to reduce taxes, to obey the Constitution and restore the Rule of Law, to adopt monetary policy that ends the bankster robbery by inflation.
I'm over 50 and favor Ron Paul... so I'm not the demographic Barone sees overlooked. I'm afraid McCrindle is right, the youth vote will be MIA for the most part, unless someone really energizes them (as Paul has). The youth now see Obama as a liar and failure (except for the REALLY stupid ones), and if Ron Paul is not the nominee, they just won't vote. Instead, they'll go on Facebook and whine and moan.
Not just the youth vote, but America as a whole is conditioned NOT to vote because they get only choiceless elections. Vote for Liar 1 or Liar 2. Crook 1 or Crook 2. Saddam Hussein or Saddam Hussein. If the GOP puts up Romney/Newt/Santorum, they run the risk of another Dole/McCain result.
And in the end, spending and taxing and wars won't change much either way.
I'll vote for any turnip or vegetable over Obama---but not expecting any real change---only to get some turnover in the compost pile. As I tell most young voters I encounter, "Even if you don't care for the candidates, hold your nose and vote against the Incumbent. Keep the ticks and parasites from digging in too deep."
Posted February 9, 2012 at 4:09:57 PM